✅ That's all for today! 📌 Practice SSC & RRB full-length mocks for free on the Academis Test Series Portal: https://testseries.academisonline.com/ 🟩 For premium Study Materials, please visit: https://pages.razorpay.com/stores/academispdf 🔔 New English PYQ quiz every day at 6:00 PM. Stay tuned!

Channel
Academis SSC PYQ Polls
@academissc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,081subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002133529638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @academissc |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/academissc |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:57 | 8,081 | -18 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:56 | 8,099 | +6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 8,093 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 8,100 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:29 | 8,099 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:31 | 8,091 | -6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:44 | 8,097 | -15 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 00:42 | 8,112 | +45 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 8,067 | -27 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 05:02 | 8,094 | -6 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 8,100 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 8,102 | -8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 8,110 | +2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:42 | 8,108 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:35 | 8,110 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 8,112 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 8,121 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 8,112 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 8,117 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 8,124 | first reading |
Engagement
181 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.96%
- avg views ÷ 8,081 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 77.5
- 160 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.086%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 160
- of 181 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 160 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 181 (23 June 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 12,406 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 00:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 39
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 119
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 181 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 181 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 160 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Select the option that expresses the given sentence in indirect speech. He said, "I spoke with my parents yesterday." (SSC CHSL 2025)
- He said that he spoke with his parents the previous day.22%
- He said that he should have speak with his parents the previous day.0%
- He said that he had spoken with his parents the previous day.78%
- He said that he would speak with his parents the day before.0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech. She said, "I was very tired yesterday." (SSC CGL 2025)
- She said she had been very tired the day before.79%
- She said she was very tired yesterday.14%
- She said she had been very tired yesterday.7%
- She said she is very tired the day before.0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
[A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech.] “Though the facts were evident, the jury chose to ignore them,” he observed. (SSC Selection Post 2025)
- He observed the facts had been evident, but jury ignored them.7%
- He observed that though the facts had been evident, the jury had chosen to ignore them.79%
- He observed though facts were evident, jury ignored it.0%
- He observed that even though facts were evident, jury ignored them.14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech. She said, “If only I hadn’t trusted him!” (SSC CPO 2025)
- She had regret that she had trusted him.36%
- She said that she wished she hadn’t trusted him.29%
- She said if only she hadn’t trusted him.36%
- She wished she didn’t trust him.0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Choose the correct indirect narration of the following statement from the given alternatives: Snigdha said, "What a beautiful day today is!" (SSC CHSL 2025)
- Snigdha exclaimed that that day has been a very beautiful day.31%
- Snigdha exclaimed that that day a very beautiful day was.8%
- Snigdha exclaimed that day was a very beautiful day.23%
- Snigdha exclaimed that that day was a very beautiful day.38%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech. He said, “You must work hard.” (SSC CGL 2025)
- He said that I must have worked hard.25%
- He said that I had to work hard.17%
- He said that you must work hard.33%
- He said that I have to work hard.25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in indirect speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding direct speech: The officer asserted that the operation could not have succeeded without local support. (SSC Selection Post 2025)
- "The operation could not have succeeded without local support," asserted the officer.46%
- "The operation succeeded without local support," said the officer.15%
- "Local support must have failed the operation," claimed the officer.15%
- "Without support, the operation will not succeed," said the officer.23%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Choose the correct indirect speech of the sentence: He said, “Whoever did this must be held accountable.” (SSC CPO 2025)
- He said that whoever did it must be held to account.20%
- He said that the one who did this must be accounted.7%
- He said that whoever had done that must be held accountable.53%
- He said that whoever did this must have held accountable.20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Choose the correct indirect narration of the following statement from the given alternatives: The mother said to the child, "Don’t touch the hot iron." (SSC CHSL 2025)
- The mother warned the child not to touch the hot iron.63%
- The mother told the child not to touched the hot iron.25%
- The mother warned the child not to be touching the hot iron.6%
- The mother requested the child never to touching the hot iron.6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in indirect speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding direct speech. The diplomat said that only after the ceasefire would negotiations begin. (SSC CGL 2025)
- “Negotiations begin only after the ceasefire,” said the diplomat.18%
- “Only after the ceasefire, negotiations would begin,” said the diplomat.29%
- “Only after the ceasefire will negotiations begin,” said the diplomat.47%
- “Negotiations would begin once the ceasefire is announced,” said the diplomat.6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📝 SSC English PYQ Daily 📝 🗣️ Today's topic: Direct & Indirect Speech 🧠 10 previous year questions (CGL, CHSL, CPO, Selection Post) 📌 SSC & RRB Full-Length Mocks - Now practice for free - Check Academis Test Series Portal: https://testseries.academisonline.com/
Showing the 12 most recent of 181 posts we hold for @academissc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 145 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Select the option that expresses the given sentence in indirect speech. He said, "I spoke with my parents yesterday." (SSC CHSL 2025)
- He said that he spoke with his parents the previous day.22%
- He said that he should have speak with his parents the previous day.0%
- He said that he had spoken with his parents the previous day.78%
- He said that he would speak with his parents the day before.0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech. She said, "I was very tired yesterday." (SSC CGL 2025)
- She said she had been very tired the day before.79%
- She said she was very tired yesterday.14%
- She said she had been very tired yesterday.7%
- She said she is very tired the day before.0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
[A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech.] “Though the facts were evident, the jury chose to ignore them,” he observed. (SSC Selection Post 2025)
- He observed the facts had been evident, but jury ignored them.7%
- He observed that though the facts had been evident, the jury had chosen to ignore them.79%
- He observed though facts were evident, jury ignored it.0%
- He observed that even though facts were evident, jury ignored them.14%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech. She said, “If only I hadn’t trusted him!” (SSC CPO 2025)
- She had regret that she had trusted him.36%
- She said that she wished she hadn’t trusted him.29%
- She said if only she hadn’t trusted him.36%
- She wished she didn’t trust him.0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Choose the correct indirect narration of the following statement from the given alternatives: Snigdha said, "What a beautiful day today is!" (SSC CHSL 2025)
- Snigdha exclaimed that that day has been a very beautiful day.31%
- Snigdha exclaimed that that day a very beautiful day was.8%
- Snigdha exclaimed that day was a very beautiful day.23%
- Snigdha exclaimed that that day was a very beautiful day.38%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A sentence is provided in direct speech. From the four given options, choose the one that most accurately conveys the sentence in its corresponding indirect speech. He said, “You must work hard.” (SSC CGL 2025)
- He said that I must have worked hard.25%
- He said that I had to work hard.17%
- He said that you must work hard.33%
- He said that I have to work hard.25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 181 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@academiseduzoneexams · 22,979
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 18 September 2026
@academis · 39,256
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026
@PSC_NEWSPAPER_CURRENT_AFFAIRS · 25,457
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
@PSC_PDF_BANK · 116,647
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@Prayaanam_innalakalilude · 78,249
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@iasgurukulofficial · 123,941
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Academis SSC PYQ Polls” (@academissc), 8,081 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academissc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.