Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Академия Инициаций Сокор Татьяны

Channel

Академия Инициаций Сокор Татьяны

@academysokor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,057subscribers

-100 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001161005893
TypeChannel
Username@academysokor
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/academysokor

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,04410,15710,100.57 August 2026 — 10,157 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,151 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,141 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,122 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,120 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,109 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,106 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,103 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,099 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,091 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,090 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,087 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,080 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,075 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,071 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,068 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,063 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,052 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,047 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,044 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,051 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,049 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,051 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,057 subscribers10,0577 August 202618 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 42 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,027–10,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:1710,057+6
15 Sept 2026, 19:4110,051+2
14 Sept 2026, 03:2010,049-2
12 Sept 2026, 09:1910,051+7
7 Sept 2026, 01:1710,044-3
4 Sept 2026, 12:3910,047-5
2 Sept 2026, 01:1510,052-11
30 Aug 2026, 19:5510,063-5
29 Aug 2026, 20:1310,068-3
28 Aug 2026, 17:4510,071-4
27 Aug 2026, 18:4510,075-5
25 Aug 2026, 16:2210,080-7
24 Aug 2026, 12:4810,087-3
21 Aug 2026, 06:5210,090-1
20 Aug 2026, 08:5810,091-8
19 Aug 2026, 06:3410,099-4
18 Aug 2026, 07:5610,103-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:3810,106-3
15 Aug 2026, 20:2310,109-4
14 Aug 2026, 09:5510,113first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.26%
avg views ÷ 10,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
529
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 91 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held91 (2 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total4,229
Reactions total331
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29m 36s
Average length
2m 07s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,545 reactions across 83 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
99939.3%
🔥64925.5%
❤‍🔥26410.4%
😁2479.71%
👍883.46%
🙏562.20%
💯471.85%
401.57%
👏351.38%
🥰321.26%
😢291.14%
🎉281.10%
🤩130.511%
👌90.354%
🤗40.157%
🤯20.079%
💋10.039%
😎10.039%
😘10.039%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,545 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 91 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @academysokor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 91 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC320 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

Свести на «нет» желание отношений ..

13👍3👌1

28 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC320 viewsread 29 August 2026

Тань, а куда посмотреть если вот уже третий мужчина и он не готов к серьезным отношениям? Все трое были раненые в прошлых отношениях. Мне в свою рененность смотреть? Быть пластырем или лечить мужчин я точно не готова

28 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC457 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

И не умeрeть от страха

11👌2🙏2

28 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC453 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Таня, вопрос не по теме бестыжей... Столкнулась сейчас с ситуацией. Подхожу вплотную к выполнению точки Б. Есть возможность закрыть все цели разом. Но если смотреть вперёд, у меня после выполнения этих целей "мертвое поле" - тишина... Цели из категории С тоже есть. Можно было бы ими подпитываться. Но я будто бы не верю в реальность их реализации, они сейчас для меня пипец какие масштабные, это даже не цели ещё а мечт

🙏4

27 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC539 views141 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Я даже мужчину выбирала, чтоб было с кем дурачиться Иначе какой смысл в этих отношениях, если с ним надо быть вечно взрослой ))

🔥77❤‍🔥29😁22🤩8👍3💯2

27 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC574 views44 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Почему вокруг меня так много инфантильных мужчин? Нахер мне эти Иванушки -Дурачки? Сколько можно все на себе ? 🙂🙂🙂🙂 Вся правда про то, откуда они берутся и что сделать, чтобы они изчезли из вашего поля зрения ))

27🔥11👍3🙏3

25 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC791 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Как я потеряла клитор в метро.. заголовок года😅😅 Так вот у нас на Бесстыжей началась тренировка по тени «Дурочка»делюсь историей участницы с ее согласия))

😁26🔥149🙏4😘1

25 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC775 views56 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Моя дурочка с переулочка😂 Как я потеряла клитор в метро Записала с экрана этот кусочек своего интервью, надо отметить, там в видео части нет -камера залагала, мне девочка его заказала из Германии в Лондон (она там живёт), он полгода у неё лежал, потом её подруга привезла в Москву с пересадками, и я его за 10мин.проебала в метро от кольцевой Таганской до Динамо, я до сих пор ржу, что этот клитор путешествовал больш

😁31🔥10❤‍🔥8👍41😎1🙏1

23 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC927 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Voice message

Оказывается можно

41❤‍🔥10

23 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC889 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Спасибо, Татьяна, за то, что так щедро делитесь и опытом, и практиками, и личным примером🌺Интересную мысль подсветили. Как раз совсем недавно пришла к тому, что вполне вероятно, что так как мечталось уже может и не случится. И с этим ок. Нарисовала другое развитие событий. А вот в строну выдержать, чтл может исполнится лучше, чем хотелось, даже в голову не приходило посмотреть 🤔 Забавно, что это то возможно и сложенн

2

23 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC871 views76 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Вы мне писали, загрузи сюда, так как нк все видят ютуб Заливаю )) про подготовку свадьбы мечты, и практику которая мне всегда помогает реализовывать желания Это кстати, мой дебют именно с точки зрения влога, обычно я просто пишу вам эфиры на ютуб и практики .. а сейчас я хочу записывать через свою жизнь - какой то опыт или практику или фишку, которая мне сильно помогла продвинуться к жизни своей мечты 💭 разберем

45🔥15❤‍🔥9🙏4🎉3

21 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC889 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Кто у нас планирует отношения 😉 уверена, как и в Грузии было, внимание мужчин будет ой как много

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @academysokor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@academysokor edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTCAnonymous Poll79 voters

Какая тема вас вчера зацепила больше всего ?

  1. Злость на отвергающего и не принимающего родителя и что ее нужно распаковать18%
  2. Что гнев надо проживать и присваивать, не прощать, оказывается16%
  3. Что в тени проститутки и экскортницы много женской ценности .. 😳24%
  4. Про дефицитарного нарцисса - увидеть, что у меня много его признаков16%
  5. Что в тени Ведьмы Сильной есть знания, не доступные многим и они ведут к умению получать, что хочеш11%
  6. Я просто узнала что у меня нарциссическая травма ..травма не ценности ..9%
  7. Свое что то что вам прям зашло5%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Жизнь и тело с Оксаной
@telo_psy · 22,276
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Академия Инициаций Сокор Татьяны” (@academysokor), 10,057 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academysokor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.