Channel
@acavest_mahan
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
348subscribers
+122 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001558595357 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @acavest_mahan |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/acavest_mahan |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 348 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 353 | +133 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 220 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 223 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 226 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 226 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
43 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 74.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 4.65% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.33% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مقاله «حساب مدیریت فعال» نوشته ویلیام شارپ، یک حقیقت ساده اما مهم را درباره سرمایهگذاری بیان میکند: اگر کل بازار را به دو گروه سرمایهگذاران فعال و غیرفعال تقسیم کنیم، بازده متوسط هر دو گروه پیش از کسر هزینهها باید برابر با بازده خود بازار باشد. دلیلش نه یک نظریه پیچیده مالی، بلکه حساب ساده است؛ مجموع داراییهای این دو گروه، همان کل بازار را تشکیل میدهد. نتیجه اصلی مقاله این است که عملکرد مدیر فعال باید با یک گزی…
👍3👎1
مقاله حساب مدیریت فعال نوشته ویلیام شارپ نوبلیست اقتصاد. ترجمه شده به فارسی. @Acavest_mahan
❤🔥1👍1
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLejNt_XdjBAHtPfxHrXekEEw5e9iYbDQD&si=zsXavxxwV-kbGsFY
❤🔥3
برای دوستانی که علاقه مند به سرمایه گذاری اصولی ، طبق علم روز مدیریت دارایی دنیا هستید پیشنهاد میکنم حتماً این ۸ قسمت ویدیو را ببینید. جمعاً زیر یک ساعت وقتتونو میگیره اما میتونه میلیارد ها سرمایه آینده و ساعت ها زمانی که ممکنه از دست بدیدو حفظ کنه.
🟢بورس در آستانه ۵.۹ میلیونی شدن
👍3
سلام دوستان روزتون بهخیر و سلامتی. امروز برای علاقه مندان به مطالعه یک مقاله ترجمه شده در زمینه مالی آپلود میکنم.
علت اصلی افت بازده فقط کارمزد نبود بلکه سرمایه گذاران معمولا سهامی را میفروختند که در اینده عملکرد بهتری از سهام تازه خریداری شده داشته . یعنی معاملات بیشتر نه تنها هزینه ایجاد کرده بلکه کیفیت تصمیم ها به اندازه ای نبود که این هزینرو جبران کنه. نویسندگان اعتماد به نفس بیش ازحد را یکی از توضیحات اصلی معامله گری افراطی میدانند. اعتماد به نفس بیش از حد منظورشون خودخواهی و.. نیست ها . یعنی این که به لحاظ ذهن…
❤🔥2👍1🤣1
این مقاله سال ۲۰۰۰ در Journal of Finance منتشر شده و بسیار معتبر هستش. پژوهشگران معاملات واقعی ۶۶٬۴۶۵ خانوار سرمایه گذار را از سال ۱۹۹۱ تا ۱۹۹۶ بررسی کردن و تمرکز مقاله روی خرید و فروش سهام عادی بوده نه قراداد های فیوچرز و معاملات اهرمی. ❕نتیجه پژوهش به صورت خلاصه 🔴بازده سالانه فعالترین سرمایهگذاران: ۱۱.۴ درصد 🟢بازده بازار در همان دوره: ۱۷.۹ درصد 🟡بازده متوسط کل سرمایه گذاران نمونه: ۱۶.۴ درصد
👍1
مقاله https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/odean/papers/returns/returns.html
پس لطفا گول تبلیغاتی که به شما میگن کدوم دارایی زودتر میره بالا چیو کجا بخرین و.. نخورید. هیچکس از آینده خبر نداره و عدم قطعیت های متفاوت و زیادی در کل این بازار وجود دارد.
👍2😱2❤🔥1
موفق ترین ها در سرمایه گذاری افرادی هستند که سفته بازی را کنار گذاشتن. این که من امروز یک دارایی ای پیدا کنم ، با توجه به فاکتور های مختلفی متوجه بشم این دارایی ، یک دارایی ارزشمند هستش. میشه یک بخش ماجرا خب حالا که من دارایی ارزشمندم رو پیدا کردم دو تا نگاه وجود داره. یک نگاه سرمایه شمارو در بلند مدت بسیار بیشتر میکنه . و یک نگاه طبق مطالعات در بلند مدت باعث عقب موندن شما از بازار میشه. هرچند در کوتاه مدت شاید ب…
👍4
این رویکرد و زاویه دید ، از من نیست. بلکه از بزرگان بازار مثل بوگل ، بافت ، لینچ ، فاما ، مالکیل ، گراهام و اشخاصی هستش که ما دانش فعلی سرمایه گذاری خودمونو مدیونشون هستیم. بزرگترین هج فاند های دنیا و اشخاصی که یک استیتمنت معتبر دارن که کاملا شفاف میتونیم بازدهیاشونو بررسی کنیم. تنها چاره ما آماده شدن قبل از بحران هستش. نمادی که توی آکاوست داریم کشتی نوح هستش. یعنی زمانی که توی بیابون کشتی میسازیم خیلیا متوجه نمی…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @acavest_mahan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکاوست | ماهان اسدی” (@acavest_mahan), 348 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/acavest_mahan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.