Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 86 days, net +1,115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,513–9,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 05:58
7,935
-84
30 Oct 2026, 15:46
8,019
-149
27 Oct 2026, 16:59
8,168
-133
24 Oct 2026, 07:59
8,301
-83
21 Oct 2026, 09:15
8,384
-192
18 Oct 2026, 02:19
8,576
-292
14 Oct 2026, 21:16
8,868
+32
11 Oct 2026, 07:59
8,836
+141
5 Oct 2026, 08:20
8,695
+208
26 Sept 2026, 18:57
8,487
+285
17 Sept 2026, 20:40
8,202
+143
13 Sept 2026, 20:57
8,059
+145
10 Sept 2026, 09:00
7,914
+136
4 Sept 2026, 23:40
7,778
+127
1 Sept 2026, 14:05
7,651
+21
30 Aug 2026, 00:15
7,630
+105
26 Aug 2026, 17:36
7,525
+99
23 Aug 2026, 20:36
7,426
+141
20 Aug 2026, 14:36
7,285
+128
17 Aug 2026, 22:23
7,157
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.4%
avg views ÷ 7,935 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,920
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held
35 (17 June 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total
39,160
Reactions total
833
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
24
Videos
1
Links
33
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,571 reactions across 35 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
530
33.7%
🔥
252
16.0%
👍
240
15.3%
😭
234
14.9%
👎
172
10.9%
😁
76
4.84%
👏
24
1.53%
🥰
21
1.34%
🤯
15
0.955%
🤔
7
0.446%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 35 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @accarvpn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Интересно такое?
Делаем свой лаунчер для телевизоров на Android.
Что в нём:
- уже установлены Happ и INCY
- подстраивается под ваш телевизор
- без рекламы на главном экране
- быстрая установка
Мнения и предложения пишите сюда: @AccarLive
Выпускать в общий доступ?
🔥 — да
👎 — нет
🔤 Хэллоуин в Accar VPN: −20% на любой тариф
Промокод: ACCAR-20
Действует до 01.11 включительно
Месяц — 191 ₽ вместо 239 ₽
Год — 1 592 ₽ вместо 1 990 ₽
Введите код при оплате → @accarvpsbot
👻 4 дня бесплатно — начните прямо сейчас: @accarvpsbot
Вы были с нами, пока Accar VPN был бесплатным. Спасибо.
Теперь у нас новые серверы:
👱♀️ стабильно в мобильной сети у всех операторов
😓 безлимитный трафик
😴 одна подписка на все ваши устройства
😃 тарифы от 99 ₽
Попробовать бесплатно → @accarvpsbot
💔 Важное объявление. Закрытие Accar VPN
Друзья, мне очень тяжело писать этот пост, но, к сожалению, пришло время попрощаться.
После долгих раздумий я принял непростое решение — проект Accar VPN прекращает свою работу.
За всё время существования проекта я вложил в него огромное количество времени, сил и денег. У меня было много планов и идей, я действительно хотел развивать сервис, делать его лучше, стабильнее и досту…
📄Вышло обновление PaperFlux 0.4.35
🚀 Нашли и исправили причину обрывов Mail.ru и падения скорости. Исправление проверили, общие серверы уже обновлены.
➡️ Скачать новый клиент
Просим всех обновиться и проверить подключение. Если проблема осталась — напишите в комментариях и приложите журнал событий.
⚠️ Не подключается PaperFlux через Mail.ru?
Удалось восстановить подключение после создания нового документа Mail.ru. Если старый профиль перестал работать, попробуйте:
Создать новый пустой документ Mail.ru.
Включить доступ по ссылке с правом редактирования.
Через @AccarFlux_bot создать новый профиль с новой ссылкой и импортировать его в приложение.
Попробуйте и напишите в комментариях, заработало ли у вас.
P.S: НЕ…
📄PaperFlux 0.4.34 — обновление
Исправили проблемы подключения к Mail.ru Документам и доработали восстановление соединения после обрывов.
Просим всех установить новый клиент и проверить подключение:
➡️Скачать APK для Android
Устанавливайте поверх текущей версии — удалять приложение не нужно, профили и настройки сохранятся.
Что с Яндексом?
Подключение через Яндекс Документы пока недоступно, выдача новых конфигураций пр…
🔧 Обновление PaperFlux
Исправили зависание подключения Mail.ru. Добавили понятные причины ошибок в журнал. Исправления Яндекса также включены.
📲 Просим всех установить новый клиент и проверить подключение:
Скачать PaperFlux 0.4.27
Устанавливайте поверх текущей версии, без удаления приложения и профилей.
Проверьте Mail.ru и Яндекс: подключается ли с первой попытки, работает ли переподключение и какая скорость.
Напиш…
🚀 Запускаем AccarFlux
Релиз сильно задержался — дольше, чем я планировал. За это время в проект вложено много сил: разработка, настройка серверов, тестирование и исправления.
Спасибо, что дождались. Очень надеюсь, что вам зайдёт 🖤
Что это и как начать
AccarFlux — отдельный проект для подключения через документы Mail.ru и Яндекса.
Доступны два варианта:
• Общий сервер — без покупки собственного VPS.
• Личный VPS — под…
👀 Soon…
Мы тестируем новую технологию подключения. Идея не новая, но в таком формате для Accar VPN это будет отдельный проект.
Если тесты подтвердят стабильность — появится ещё один способ подключения, который можно будет считать альтернативой qWDTT.
Пока без подробностей, но работа уже идёт 🛡
🪙Поддержать проект |🛜MTProto
🔗VK TURN(БС) | 👤AccarVpn(БС) | 🎮 Дешевый донат | 🤖 Бесплатный ИИ
🛠 Обновление серверов @AccarTunnelBot
Последнюю неделю мы работали над инфраструктурой @AccarTunnelBot и добавили важное улучшение — распределение подключений между несколькими серверами.
⚙Теперь система может бесшовно подключать дополнительные VPS и распределять между ними нагрузку. При подключении пользователь автоматически попадает на один из серверов, а дальше остаётся закреплён за ним для стабильной работы.
📎Г…
❤34👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @accarvpn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Готовы попробовать платный Accar VPN с 4 днями бесплатно?
Возможно, начну с теста17%
Да, если качество устроит14%
Нужен только бесплатный49%
Уже пользуюсь другим21%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@accarvpn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@accarassistant named in 2 posts, 20 August 2026 – 29 August 2026 · confirmed gone 31 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Accar VPN – Новости” (@accarvpn), 7,935 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/accarvpn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.