Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Скелети Шевчика і Ко

Channel

Скелети Шевчика і Ко

@actual_energodar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,651subscribers

+380 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708840880
TypeChannel
Username@actual_energodar
Created27 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/actual_energodar

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,27124,65124,4617 August 2026 — 24,271 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,271 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,283 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,303 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,298 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,330 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,363 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,383 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,437 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,436 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,434 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,425 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,411 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,414 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,404 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,389 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,388 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,397 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,408 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,434 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,444 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,441 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,450 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,454 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,451 subscribers6 September 2026 — 24,487 subscribers9 September 2026 — 24,502 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,533 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,592 subscribers15 September 2026 — 24,622 subscribers17 September 2026 — 24,651 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net +380. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,214–24,708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:2124,651+29
15 Sept 2026, 11:3824,622+30
13 Sept 2026, 19:5724,592+59
12 Sept 2026, 00:5824,533+31
9 Sept 2026, 14:5624,502+15
6 Sept 2026, 09:5624,487+36
3 Sept 2026, 22:3724,451-3
2 Sept 2026, 13:1324,454+4
1 Sept 2026, 12:4624,450+9
31 Aug 2026, 12:0824,441-3
30 Aug 2026, 12:1324,444+10
29 Aug 2026, 08:3524,434+26
28 Aug 2026, 06:3824,408+11
27 Aug 2026, 04:1724,397+9
26 Aug 2026, 05:2724,388-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:2424,389-15
24 Aug 2026, 01:2824,404-10
20 Aug 2026, 19:5324,414+3
19 Aug 2026, 20:1424,411-14
18 Aug 2026, 18:0424,425first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.1%
avg views ÷ 24,651 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,600
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held34 (1 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total69,610
Reactions total1,485
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 22s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,513 reactions across 34 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,96623.1%
💯1,71020.1%
🔥7709.04%
🤮6427.54%
💩4154.87%
😢4094.80%
💔4024.72%
❤‍🔥3173.72%
👍3053.58%
🙏2603.05%
🤣2302.70%
🫡1982.33%
👀1872.20%
😡1852.17%
👏800.94%
✍780.916%
😁690.811%
😭450.529%
😈420.493%
🥱370.435%
20 further kinds1661.95%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,513 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 34 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @actual_energodar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈4,110 views66 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А пам'ятаєте у нас на каналі були такі публікації: https://t.me/actual_energodar/1407 https://t.me/actual_energodar/4458 Якщо люди не брешуть (а ці люди нам ще ніколи не брехали), то по вказаній недолюдині скоро будуть дуже цікаві новини 👀👀👀 Слідкуємо...

👍39👀18🌚8🥱1

2 Sept 2026, 05:08 UTC≈10,100 views142 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

После вчерашней публикации энергодарские крысы обиделись, что они не первые слились, и решили переплюнуть даже каменских крыс 😂😂😂 Для поднятия ценности крысы слили не только адреса "участков", но и разработанные тупорылыми орками методы "конспирации" 😂😂😂 "Резервные помещения" 😂 Одноклеточные, вы сгорите в труху в любых помещениях!!! 🔥 хоть в основных, хоть в резервных 😄 Теперь ждём, чем ответят на такой ход камен…

👍86❤23🔥22🤮8🗿2🥱1

1 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC≈13,100 views130 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Смешно также то, что на оккупированной Запорожской АЭС "голосование" на "выборах" руснявые ебанаты начали уже СЕГОДНЯ 😂😂😂 Всю срань, приехавшую на ЗАЭС с болотных атомных станций, уже сегодня как стадо сгоняли на четвёртый этаж для "голосования"... ебанаты 🤦‍♂️ Да и правильно, чего ждать 😄 вдруг не все из них доживут до "официального дня выборов" 😱 а цифры то уже нарисованы 😄

👍43😁41🤣30❤8🤮4🥱4

1 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC≈11,500 views175 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

И снова, как только приближается ебанариум под названием "выборы на ТОТ", активизируются крысы, которые сливом информации хотят выторговать себе хотя бы жизнь... Нам "любезно предоставили" (в обмен на обещание вычеркнуть всего лишь один дом предателя из списка целей) полный список "избирательных комиссий" на побережье. по ВСЕМ!!! комиссиям... Не только с адресами самих "участков", но и с фамилиями и подписями глав …

🔥113❤22👏17😈10🤮8🥱3💯1😡1

30 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈14,200 views585 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Енергодарці 💪💪💪

❤453👍41🔥32💩25🤮19🙏8🤣6⚡1

29 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈16,600 views387 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Пам'ятаємо кожного та кожну... 🫡🇺🇦🫡🇺🇦🫡🇺🇦

❤189😢72🙏40🫡31🤮20💩19💔16

25 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈27,300 views299 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А пидоры руснявые продолжают заниматься хуйнёй и террором... в этот раз в отношении жителя Благовещенки... Просто ебучее руснявое гестапо...

💔135😡71💯43😢17👏11🤣6❤5🔥4

25 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC≈24,600 views214 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Еще один недалёкий ублюдок!🤷🏻‍♂️ Таран Сергей Петрович, 07.09.1963 года высера, 7990556389, https://vk.com/id746483201, https://ok.ru/profile/592925394613, https://web.facebook.com/rokcokrok. Это мерзкое ебало в начале 2000-х работало в «Исполнительном комитете Водянской сельськой раде» (если знаете больше, то напишите в комментариях), живет в Даре. Даже писать не надо, как оно любит пидороSSию, которая забрала все…

🤮113💯58❤21💩21🥱1

24 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈19,000 views503 reactions10 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🫡🇺🇦🫡🇺🇦🫡🇺🇦

❤‍🔥278❤107🫡41💩31🤮29👍9🙏4🤣3

23 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈21,500 views547 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

❤403💩40❤‍🔥26🤮25🫡22👍13🙏9🥴3

22 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈23,100 views143 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

На обсуждение! Савченко Юрий Алексеевич, 22.03.1952, https://web.facebook.com/savchenko.poet. Дедушка Юра, интеллигент, образованный, был преподавателем в авторской песне в ЦДЮТ. Тут вот какая проблема, пел песни для Украины и про Украину. А тут за дедов понесло. Да ещё и с флагом красуется.🤔 А теперь вопрос, дед пока не был замечен в рьяной поддержке пидоров, но в свою очередь вышел к деткам, которым вливают люб…

🤮85💩29❤24🤔3🥱1😁1

22 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈19,300 views177 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Очередное ебучее кино от орков... Каждый раз всё более душераздирающие заголовки... А толку ноль... Как ебашили орков в округе, так и ебашат... Готовы поспорить, что в ближайшее время орки заебашат ещё кучку "атомщиков", так как дела в Энергодаре и вокруг у них не очень, а говорить о чём то надо... Поэтому всем колобкам-"атомщикам" желаем хорошего настроения при перемещениях по промзоне... Оркам нужен шум вокру…

💯122👀17❤15👍7🤮6😁5🥱4🌚1

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @actual_energodar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@actual_energodar edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ЭНЕРГОДАР СЕГОДНЯ
@energodartime · 26,752
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Непосредственно Gachi 🇺🇦
@gachi_defence · 27,536
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
🚨ЗАГРОЗА: Нікополь/Марганець
@warningNK · 30,433
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
ХМ 🇺🇦 Марганець
@huevuy_mn · 29,450
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Скелети Шевчика і Ко” (@actual_energodar), 24,651 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actual_energodar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.