Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Actuarium

Channel

Actuarium

@actuarium

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,622subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001388062170
TypeChannel
Username@actuarium
Created19 April 2019measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/actuarium

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,6226,7086,6657 August 2026 — 6,708 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,708 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,696 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,694 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,691 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,682 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,678 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,672 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,669 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,659 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,653 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,638 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,636 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,622 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,609–6,721 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:196,622-14
13 Sept 2026, 07:016,636-2
9 Sept 2026, 06:166,638-15
4 Sept 2026, 06:416,653-6
1 Sept 2026, 01:346,659-10
28 Aug 2026, 15:126,669-3
25 Aug 2026, 22:576,672-6
22 Aug 2026, 19:446,678-4
19 Aug 2026, 04:476,682-9
15 Aug 2026, 19:376,691-3
12 Aug 2026, 14:546,694-2
10 Aug 2026, 01:016,696-12
7 Aug 2026, 02:156,708no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:086,708first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 19 April 2019the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,669 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,15843.4%
82931.1%
😡33512.6%
🤣1274.76%
🙏1134.23%
😁662.47%
😢361.35%
👎50.187%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,669 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2019 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,990 views62 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/vlM9bfxDock

🙏33👍209

15 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,750 views106 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ok, dann habe ich das Video für euch schon fertig gedreht. Weil ihr es seid. 😄

😁40🤣2719👍11🙏9

15 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,770 views102 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Nach wenigen Minuten sehen wir schon, dass alle drei Themen gefragt sind und offenbar keines uninteressant ist ... nagut, dann verarbeiten wir alles drei in einem Video heute.

👍63🤣1910🙏7😁3

15 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC≈1,800 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Worüber wollen wir heute ein Video drehen? Ihr entscheidet.

  1. Warum ist Hormus so extrem wichtig für Trump?28%
  2. Strategische Ölreserven der USA34%
  3. Wer hält länger durch, Iran oder USA?63%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍311

31 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC≈4,130 views64 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/-dwDJAB4gLY

36👍27😁1

18 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC≈5,780 views87 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWNObdYWHU8

52👍29🙏4🤣2

19 Jun 2026, 15:55 UTC≈6,780 views84 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/FN9VoFwrFL0

👍79😢41

5 Jun 2026, 13:53 UTC≈7,550 views131 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Video fertig: https://youtu.be/oAR7M3SZ-c4

🤣57👍5511😁7😡1

5 Jun 2026, 13:52 UTC≈5,370 views74 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ok, dann machen wir es.

👍57🤣125

5 Jun 2026, 13:50 UTC≈5,470 views146 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Es gab lange keine Videos mehr. Wollen wir heute die UN-Niederlage Deutschlands besprechen? Das Thema motiviert :D

👍127😁134👎2

17 May 2026, 11:11 UTC≈7,360 views105 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://youtu.be/gHMSB0WSF6k

👍57😡425👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @actuarium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTCAnonymous Poll468 voters

Worüber wollen wir heute ein Video drehen? Ihr entscheidet.

  1. Warum ist Hormus so extrem wichtig für Trump?28%
  2. Strategische Ölreserven der USA34%
  3. Wer hält länger durch, Iran oder USA?63%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2019 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

achse:ostwest
@achseostwest · 26,444
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Actuarium” (@actuarium), 6,622 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/actuarium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.