Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Продюсерские вибрации || Зубова Анжелика

Channel

Продюсерские вибрации || Зубова Анжелика

@ada_legna

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

139subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002144068688
TypeChannel
Username@ada_legna
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ada_legna

Growth

13914114010 August 2026 — 139 subscribers10 August 2026 — 139 subscribers18 August 2026 — 141 subscribers25 August 2026 — 140 subscribers1 September 2026 — 139 subscribers10 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 139–141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 16:54139-1
25 Aug 2026, 13:12140-1
18 Aug 2026, 09:43141+2
10 Aug 2026, 16:27139no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:46139first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤝833.3%
💯625.0%
❤‍🔥312.5%
🤩312.5%
🔥28.33%
😁28.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯1

Signed Анжелика Зубова

9 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC96 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed Анжелика Зубова

9 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC95 viewsread 10 August 2026

Это были орания в лесу, все мои конкурсы людям вроде зашли, горжусь собой⬇️

Signed Анжелика Зубова

9 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Провела эфир. Щас поеду в лес орать. Впервые пишу это не в рамках шутки)))

🔥1

Signed Анжелика Зубова

9 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC39 viewsread 10 August 2026

Не пишите, что это простая идея, не разочаровывайте меня.

Signed Анжелика Зубова

9 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Мне пришла гениальная идея: надо найти организатора для тренингов, оплата — процент с набора группы. Я гений. Обращайтесь, если актуально.

😁1

Signed Анжелика Зубова

8 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

У меня ребёнок научился ездить на велосипеде. Это было большое и трудное дело. Вспомнила, когда я училась кататься на велике, мне казалось, что это норма и никто этому не учится, сразу надо сесть и поехать. У меня сильно не получалось, так что я считала это огромным своим недостатком, которого надо стыдиться. Первый мой выезд на большом велосипеде (не на моём) закончился падением с мостика в ручей, при этом я больш

❤‍🔥3🤩2

Signed Анжелика Зубова

8 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

На самом деле, большая часть работы организатора чего бы то ни было, это оперативно отвечать на сообщения и вечность ждать, когда ответят другие.

💯2

Signed Анжелика Зубова

7 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Про Декстера было, кстати.

Signed Анжелика Зубова

7 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC40 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Какая лучше?

  1. 1️⃣0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Анжелика Зубова

7 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC38 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что думаете?

Signed Анжелика Зубова

7 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC39 viewsread 10 August 2026

Мне нравится, что gpt сам решил, что мои стихи в стимпанк стиле.

Signed Анжелика Зубова

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ada_legna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTCAnonymous Poll2 voters

Какая лучше?

  1. 1️⃣0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продюсерские вибрации || Зубова Анжелика” (@ada_legna), 139 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ada_legna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.