Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Адептэ УЛЯ БЛЯТЬ!!!

Channel

Адептэ УЛЯ БЛЯТЬ!!!

@adepteulya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

172subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692386827
TypeChannel
Username@adepteulya
Created11 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/adepteulya

Growth

1721801767 August 2026 — 180 subscribers7 August 2026 — 180 subscribers7 August 2026 — 179 subscribers29 August 2026 — 174 subscribers6 September 2026 — 172 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 171–181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 06:17172-2
29 Aug 2026, 05:34174-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:58179-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:17180no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:00180first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53233721753678987171955.9%
custom 51929495534850697221029.4%
custom 5213367570312214099514.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @adepteulya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ирония: еще до выхода клипа я почему-то вспомнила про серебряный бомбер... Феликс в клипе, это твои вайбы?

7 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC14 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52133675703122140992

6 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @somaekcdtPhoto

Кстати, подписывайтесь на наш тикиток Различные смешнявочки будут там)

custom 53233721753678987171

6 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Не позовут - сама поставлю...как обычно хах

custom 52133675703122140993

6 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC38 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А чисто в теории, если я решусь таки ставить герлсет...кто пойдёт?

custom 53233721753678987173

6 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Больше нет вопросов Тот самый красно-рыжий...проходили

custom 53233721753678987174

6 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC40 viewsread 7 August 2026

Я ДОЖДАЛАСЬ!!! МИНХООООООООО ТЫ Ж БУСИНА МОЯ НЕЖНАЯ ААААААААААААААА

4 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC49 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Когда Нейт поставит Вонхо...?

custom 51929495534850697222

4 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ileemhVideo

🐺: спрашивать, как дела, кажется немного... деликатным, честно говоря (Минхо болел :( ) 🐰: не поймите неправильно, я не в плохом настроении.. 🐿️: он сегодня в отличном настроении 🤓☝️

custom 51929495534850697223

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @adepteulya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Адептэ УЛЯ БЛЯТЬ!!!” (@adepteulya), 172 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/adepteulya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.