Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
94 posts held, back to 28 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.3%
- avg views ÷ 1,504,684 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 155,000
- 94 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.12%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 94
- of 94 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈36,600
- Videos
- ≈19,300
- Links
- ≈63,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 7m 27s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 75 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 32 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 1.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 37.3% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 76.6% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 155,000 views — 10.3% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 173,400).
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
163,481 reactions across 94 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163,481 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 43
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 23
- of 94 we hold a reading for · 24%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @advocatprava7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 94 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 September 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
30 Sept 2026, 19:00 UTC≈78,800 views164 reactionsread 30 September 2026 ❗️❗️❗️ ПЕРЕЙШЛА ЗА ФІШИНГОВИМ ПОСИЛАННЯМ – БАНК ГРОШІ НЕ ПОВЕРНЕ
Судова практика ⚖️
💁🏻♂️ Коли шахраї списують гроші з картки, перша логічна думка – операцію здійснював не я, отже банк має все повернути. І загалом закон дійсно захищає клієнта від несанкціонованих платежів. Але є важливе «але»: якщо особа сама передала шахраям інформацію, яка дала можливість отримати доступ до рахунку, розподіл відповідальності може …
❤83👍23🖕19🤨17💩8🤣4🔥3👎2
30 Sept 2026, 18:46 UTC≈91,200 views1,646 reactionsread 30 September 2026 Photo
‼️С 1 октября студентов могут отчислить из вуза, если они не сдадут курс "Основы национального сопротивления", - Судово-юридична газета
Речь идёт о студентах, получающих профессиональное предвузовское и высшее образование по дневной или дуальной форме обучения.
Отказ от изучения дисциплины или неуспешная сдача могут стать основанием для отчисления.
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
💊934🖕339🤬116👍99😁48❤39💩38🤯11
30 Sept 2026, 18:24 UTC≈103,000 views851 reactionsread 30 September 2026 Photo
‼️Завтра, 1 жовтня, з 08.00-11.00 та 16.00-21.00 будуть застосовані графіки погодинних відключень для всіх категорій споживачів обсягом 0.5 черги, — Укренерго
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
🤬564😢135💊42🖕29❤27🤣17👎12❤🔥9
30 Sept 2026, 18:07 UTC≈117,000 views1,577 reactions4 Starsread 30 September 2026 ❗️❗️❗️КИШИНЕВ В УКРИТТЯ
Реактивний «шахед» летить у напрямку столиці Молдови і незабаром буде над Кишиневом, — монітори
Сьогодні вночі вже один шахед вдарив по Молдові
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
🤣866😡418🙏78😭61🗿39🙊29❤27😁24
30 Sept 2026, 17:36 UTC≈124,000 views1,415 reactionsread 30 September 2026 Photo
‼️Обстрелов будет ещё больше: РФ накопила значительные запасы дронов и ракет для осенне-зимней кампании, - CBS News
Основными целями зимой, как ожидается, станут электроэнергетическая и отопительная инфраструктура, а реактивные БпЛА и ракеты также могут применять по предприятиям и складам.
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
🤬1,040😭146🙏92❤36💊36👎19😁17🔥10
30 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈121,000 views2,102 reactionsread 30 September 2026 Poll
Ви підтримуєте штрафи за спілкування російською мовою дітями на перервах?
- Так14%
- Ні87%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🖕1,260👎314💊310💯80🤣39😁33🤯26🤬22
30 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈120,000 views2,559 reactionsread 30 September 2026 ‼Це точно євроінтеграція?
Депутати, прикриваючись євроінтеграцією, намагаються дозволити навчання угорською мовою, одночасно запровадивши штрафи за використання російської навіть дітьми на перервах.
Який народ представляють ці депутати?
💩1,650🤬497💊211😁51🤣48💯38👎23🖕16
30 Sept 2026, 17:10 UTC≈133,000 views1,666 reactionsread 30 September 2026 ❗❗❗ГОТУЄМОСЬ
Негайно робіть запаси води та заряджайте гаджети: русня готується вибити енергетику у найближчі дні, вночі можливий дуже масований удар, — монітори
📍Ворог готує до застосування крилаті ракети морського базування "Калібр".
📍Також отримано попередження на балістичний удар по Києву.
📍Русня схоже під кожен регіон для знищення енергетики підготувала окремий засіб ураження.
📍Тривога у Києві може буде до завт…
🤬1,100🙏239😭118❤79🖕43🥱35🤣24😡18
30 Sept 2026, 16:38 UTC≈132,000 views1,832 reactionsread 30 September 2026 Photo
‼️Більше половини українських F-16 наразі не можуть виконувати бойові завдання через затримки з технічним обслуговуванням у Бельгії, — WSJ
Через дефіцит запчастин і необхідність частішого ремонту після інтенсивної експлуатації винищувачів значна частина літаків залишається на землі.
За нинішніх темпів обслуговування та ремонту Україна ризикує до кінця року втратити й решту справних F-16, зазначає видання.
ПОДПИСАТ…
😢838🤬596🤣239💩67😁21👏17👍14🤪12
30 Sept 2026, 15:54 UTC≈138,000 views891 reactionsread 30 September 2026 Photo
‼️Графіки повернулись
Для Києва ввели графіки відключень
Ми не сумували, але вони повернулись
Хоча зараз екстрені відключення і графіки не діють...
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
🙏350😭233🤬120😡59💩39❤38😁23⚡12
30 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC≈153,000 views2,439 reactions1 Starread 30 September 2026 Video
❗️❗️❗️ПЗДЦ ПОЧИНАЄТЬСЯ
Щонайменше 30% жителів Києва без світла — в столиці зараз зупинилося метро та електротранспорт. Назріває черговий транспортний колапс.
ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ
🤬1,690🤯263🙏189😢128❤54😁38🤷♂27👍17
30 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈150,000 views1,840 reactionsread 30 September 2026 ❗️❗️❗️БУДЕ БЛЕКАУТ ПОВНИЙ
рф планує атакувати важливі високовольтні лінії електропередач: росіяни вперше застосували на реактивному БПЛА особливий боєзаряд КРСН, який створений для знищення високовольтних опор та залізних мостових конструкцій. Це — погані новини, — радник Зеленського Сергій «Флеш».
❗️Екстрені відключення світла введено у Києві, — ДТЕК.
Не користуйтеся ліфтами — світло може зникнути у будь-який мом…
🤬1,360💩202😭88❤60😡35🔥24👏20😢19
Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @advocatprava7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@advocatprava7 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 29 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 30 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
30 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTCAnonymous Poll20,700 voters approx. Ви підтримуєте штрафи за спілкування російською мовою дітями на перервах?
- Так14%
- Ні87%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адвокат Права” (@advocatprava7), 1,504,684 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/advocatprava7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.