Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6447779555
👍5

Channel
@afeiSSS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17,013subscribers
+1,247 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002119275188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @afeiSSS @bfh666 |
| Description | 定制/招商/建议/反馈☞ @afeivip 本频道直运营tg代理,其他为广告与频道运营项目无关。内置节点高速代理MTProto/socks5直连telegram 阿飞频道 @afeisss 交流群 @afeiqun *本频道资源仅在电报流通,禁止搬运至国内网络,侵权自负责任。 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/afeiSSS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:48 | 17,013 | +15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 16,998 | +26 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 16,972 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:03 | 16,965 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 16,951 | +30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 16,921 | +35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 16,886 | +11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 16,875 | +20 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 16,855 | +30 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:59 | 16,825 | +23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 16,802 | +16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 16,786 | +17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 16,769 | +45 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 16,724 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 16,708 | +18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 16,690 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 16,682 | +26 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 16,656 | +22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 16,634 | +41 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 16,593 | first reading |
85 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 85 (18 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 148,532 |
| Reactions total | 1,780 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,135 reactions across 80 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,216 | 70.7% | |
| ❤ | 575 | 18.3% | |
| 😭 | 49 | 1.56% | |
| 🥰 | 33 | 1.05% | |
| 😁 | 32 | 1.02% | |
| 😱 | 32 | 1.02% | |
| 🤔 | 32 | 1.02% | |
| 🫡 | 30 | 0.957% | |
| 🎉 | 25 | 0.797% | |
| 🤓 | 25 | 0.797% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 0.606% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 0.542% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 0.478% | |
| 😡 | 9 | 0.287% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 0.191% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 0.191% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.159% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.128% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.096% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.064% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,135 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @afeiSSS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6447779555
👍5
以上都可以弄赞助商 就是别人没加入你频道 又使用你的代理的话 置顶会显示赞助商你的频道
👍3
私人独享大带宽代理定制 美国LAX Lite-5000Mb-1000G 20元/月 其他定制请联系 @qevvvvv
👍3
私人独享大带宽代理定制 香港BGP-250Mb-不限制 60元/月 其他定制请联系 @qevvvvv
👍5
🌟 阿飞频道 @afeisss 长期提供免费服务 更新时间:2026.09.01 优化服务器 更换稳定代理路线 🔑线路概览: 点击蓝色字体跳使用教程 切记关闭内置代理 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 😀 德国路线① | 😀 美国路线② ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 分享给其他用户使用,速度增加100% ❤️大家多多转发!你们转发就是我更新的动力 #免费代理 #免费节点 #内置代理 每日评论“代理”可获取服务使用时长 ⬇️ 下方表情回应·增加权重
👍53❤8
🌟 阿飞频道 @afeisss 长期提供免费服务 更新时间:2026.08.31 优化服务器 更换稳定代理路线 🔑线路概览: 点击蓝色字体跳使用教程 切记关闭内置代理 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 😀 香港路线① | 😀 香港路线② ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 分享给其他用户使用,速度增加100% ❤️大家多多转发!你们转发就是我更新的动力 #免费代理 #免费节点 #内置代理 每日评论“代理”可获取服务使用时长 ⬇️ 下方表情回应·增加权重
👍75❤10
🌟 阿飞频道 @afeisss 长期提供免费服务 更新时间:2026.08.29 优化服务器 更换稳定代理路线 🔑线路概览: 点击蓝色字体跳使用教程 切记关闭内置代理 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 😀 德国路线① | 🚀 香港机场② ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 分享给其他用户使用,速度增加100% ❤️大家多多转发!你们转发就是我更新的动力 #免费代理 #免费节点 #内置代理 每日评论“代理”可获取服务使用时长 ⬇️ 下方表情回应·增加权重
👍68❤9🥱2
🌟 阿飞频道 @afeisss 长期提供免费服务 更新时间:2026.08.27 本次更新已完成线路优化调整 🔑线路概览: 点击蓝色字体跳使用教程 切记关闭其他VPN ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 😀①德国路线 | 🚀②香港机场 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 分享给其他用户使用,速度增加100% ❤️大家多多转发!你们转发就是我更新的动力 #免费代理 #免费节点 #内置代理 每日评论“代理”可获取服务使用时长 ⬇️ 下方表情回应·增加权重
❤39👍17😁2
这几天买台新的的服务器,兄弟们耐心等待一下
👍40❤3
⭐️ 恭喜您获得红包资格 ⭐️ 💸已发放 ¥81,652 🔺今日剩余 168 份 ⚙️最新领取 用户***杰 领取188.66 RMB🪙 用户***婷 领取58.80 RMB🪙 用户***豪 领取666.66 RMB🪙 ⏰红包30分钟后失效💤
👍9
🌐飞机用户都在玩的真人德州牌桌 金盛德州🟧真人对战🟧Telegram直达 无需下载,打开即可快速参与。 ✅ 支持 U 充 U 取 ✅ 严查代打与伙牌 ✅ 真人玩家在线博弈 ✅ 牌局稳定,操作便捷 ✅ 随机洗牌,公平竞技 不是运气的独角戏, 而是判断、策略与心理的正面交锋。 懂牌的人,都懂得什么时候出手。 🏆祝老板们一路长虹
👍14❤10
https://t.me/VexoraGF 进群等待最新通知
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @afeiSSS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@afeiSSS edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
更新什么
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 103,238 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@afeiSSS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“阿飞 Telegram 免费高速代理 @afeisss” (@afeiSSS), 17,013 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afeiSSS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.