Channel
@agencevalentin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001883003550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agencevalentin |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agencevalentin |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 24 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 05:09 | 22 | +3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 13:23 | 19 | no change |
| 9 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 19 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 18 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (6 October 2026 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 108 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 13:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Lu cette semaine chez une coach amoureuse russe très suivie. Ce qu'elle dit aux femmes sur les hommes comme vous. Un homme fort n'a pas besoin d'une femme qui marche sur la pointe des pieds. Une femme qui tourne autour de lui en se demandant sans cesse : « Comment ne pas le perdre ? » Au contraire : quand vous commencez à contrôler un homme, à le serrer, à le priver de liberté, la relation devient pour lui comme d…
« J'ai épousé un ado. » Je ne crois pas que le problème soit le jeu vidéo. Une Russe de 32 ans écrit cette semaine à un canal de psychologie masculine. Son mari joue tous les soirs, jusqu'à minuit. Pour le reste, dit-elle, c'est un bon mari : il travaille, aide à la maison, n'oublie aucune date. Ce qui la blesse est ailleurs. « Pourquoi l'idée d'aller au cinéma, de marcher, de partir le week-end vient-elle presque …
Une lectrice écrit à un canal russe de psychologie masculine. À lire avant de rencontrer ses amis. « J'ai honte de mon mari devant mes amis. » J'ai 35 ans, nous sommes ensemble depuis six ans, mariés depuis trois. Parfois, j'ai honte de mon mari. Pas de son physique ni de son travail : de sa façon d'être avec mes amis. Ils travaillent dans les médias, la publicité, l'architecture. Oleg vend du matériel de chantier…
Et vous, vous êtes déjà allé en Russie ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
« Materialists », vu par un vrai entremetteur. Dans le film de Celine Song, sorti en 2025, Dakota Johnson joue Lucy, entremetteuse à New York. Trois choses y sont justes. Les clients arrivent avec des listes chiffrées : âge, taille, revenu. Lucy les traite comme un calcul, et le film en fait sa limite. Une agence répond de chaque présentation. Une cliente de Lucy est agressée par l'homme qu'elle lui a présenté, e…
La Tatare est musulmane. Et elle choisit son mari. Les Tatars sont le deuxième peuple de Russie. Près de 5 millions de personnes au recensement de 2021. Autour de Kazan, mais aussi dans toutes les grandes villes. Musulmans depuis le Xe siècle. Laïcisés par soixante-dix ans d'Union soviétique. Aujourd'hui, la grande majorité des Tatares ne porte pas le foulard. Le mariage religieux s'ajoute à l'état civil, sans en …
Un premier appel vidéo se perd rarement sur le physique. Il se perd sur trois choses : ne poser aucune question, complimenter toujours le même trait, parler d’elle à la troisième personne. Avant chaque mise en contact, je prépare mes clients à ce premier échange. → www.valentin.love
🔥1
Lu cette semaine sur un canal russe de psychologie de l'amour. Parfois, on part alors qu'on aime encore. Pas parce que les sentiments ont disparu. Mais parce qu'on s'est senti inutile trop longtemps. Qu'on a expliqué trop de fois qu'on avait mal. Qu'on a trop souvent attendu une attention qui aurait dû être réciproque. Et un jour, on comprend : l'amour est là, mais on n'a plus la force de se battre pour la relation…
Elle n'écoute pas ce que vous dites. Elle regarde ce que vous faites. Cette semaine, une coach russe connue consacrait un direct à une seule question : comment distinguer le vrai intérêt d'un homme du beau discours. Beaucoup d'hommes pensent séduire par leurs messages. Les femmes russes que je rencontre retiennent autre chose. Vous étiez à l'heure à la visio. Vous vous souvenez de ce qu'elle vous a raconté la dern…
Un seul test démasque un faux profil. Proposez un appel vidéo en direct. Une femme réellement intéressée accepte. Si la caméra « ne marche pas » semaine après semaine, vous n'échangez pas avec la personne des photos. Les autres signaux : des photos trop parfaites ; un « je t'aime » au bout de deux semaines ; et surtout une demande d'argent. Visa, billet d'avion, urgence médicale : la raison ne change rien. À l'ag…
Une lectrice russe écrit à un canal de psychologie masculine. Sa question vaut pour beaucoup de couples. « Mon mari a une meilleure amie. Et ce n'est pas moi. » J'ai 33 ans, nous sommes mariés depuis quatre ans. Il y a six mois, une nouvelle collègue est arrivée à son travail. Ils ont commencé à déjeuner ensemble, à s'écrire, à s'envoyer des mèmes. Je lui ai demandé franchement s'il y avait quelque chose entre eux…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @agencevalentin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Et vous, vous êtes déjà allé en Russie ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2026 to 13 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Agence Valentin 💘” (@agencevalentin), 24 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agencevalentin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.