Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Агент свободы | тайный юрист

Channel

Агент свободы | тайный юрист

@agent_svobodi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

34,661subscribers

-294 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001309125565
TypeChannel
Username@agent_svobodi
DescriptionКанал об избавлении от кредитов, ипотеки, долгов, судов, налогов, штрафов, ЖКХ, ГИБДД Сотрудничество @AleksGan_pro менеджеры @newonce Подручный Юрист | Нейросеть http://t.me/agent_urist_bot?start=3
Created23 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 October 2026
Measurements held46
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/agent_svobodi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

34,66135,01934,8406 August 2026 — 34,955 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,973 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,989 subscribers9 August 2026 — 35,004 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,992 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,988 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,967 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,970 subscribers15 August 2026 — 35,001 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,018 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,004 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,017 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,008 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,011 subscribers22 August 2026 — 35,019 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,007 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,005 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,002 subscribers27 August 2026 — 34,998 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,000 subscribers29 August 2026 — 34,997 subscribers30 August 2026 — 34,984 subscribers31 August 2026 — 34,974 subscribers1 September 2026 — 34,937 subscribers2 September 2026 — 34,923 subscribers4 September 2026 — 34,948 subscribers6 September 2026 — 34,944 subscribers10 September 2026 — 34,920 subscribers13 September 2026 — 34,891 subscribers15 September 2026 — 34,873 subscribers17 September 2026 — 34,863 subscribers19 September 2026 — 34,855 subscribers26 September 2026 — 34,803 subscribers4 October 2026 — 34,808 subscribers9 October 2026 — 34,786 subscribers13 October 2026 — 34,747 subscribers14 October 2026 — 34,734 subscribers16 October 2026 — 34,722 subscribers17 October 2026 — 34,712 subscribers18 October 2026 — 34,703 subscribers19 October 2026 — 34,693 subscribers20 October 2026 — 34,706 subscribers22 October 2026 — 34,692 subscribers23 October 2026 — 34,666 subscribers24 October 2026 — 34,671 subscribers25 October 2026 — 34,661 subscribers6 August 202625 October 2026
46 measurements spanning 80 days, net -294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,607–35,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 46
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Oct 2026, 04:4834,661-10
24 Oct 2026, 02:2034,671+5
23 Oct 2026, 03:0634,666-26
22 Oct 2026, 05:5534,692-14
20 Oct 2026, 19:5534,706+13
19 Oct 2026, 17:4834,693-10
18 Oct 2026, 14:2134,703-9
17 Oct 2026, 16:5634,712-10
16 Oct 2026, 17:1634,722-12
14 Oct 2026, 19:0034,734-13
13 Oct 2026, 09:5634,747-39
9 Oct 2026, 03:4034,786-22
4 Oct 2026, 17:2034,808+5
26 Sept 2026, 20:0134,803-52
19 Sept 2026, 16:4234,855-8
17 Sept 2026, 08:0134,863-10
15 Sept 2026, 11:0034,873-18
13 Sept 2026, 22:2034,891-29
10 Sept 2026, 02:3934,920-24
6 Sept 2026, 18:5834,944first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 34,661 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,490
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.989%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held39 (18 June 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total27,900
Reactions total276
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,020
Videos
≈819
Links
≈3,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 04s
Average length
1m 49s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,378 reactions across 38 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍43531.6%
😁27319.8%
🔥20715.0%
👎20014.5%
💯16211.8%
🤝1017.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,378 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,430 views25 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

#Наши_победы народные победы ⚖️ СОБРАНИЯ НЕ БЫЛО, А ПРОТОКОЛ ЕСТЬ! ВЕРХОВНЫЙ СУД ПОСТАВИЛ УК НА МЕСТО Представьте ситуацию. Собственники дома решили сменить управляющую компанию. Всё по закону, провели собрание, проголосовали. Но старая УК уходить не захотела. И тут случилось настоящее коммунальное «чудо»! 🤡 Вдруг появились ДВА новых протокола собраний, согласно которым жильцы якобы передумали и снова выбрали преж…

👍12🤝7🔥6

21 Oct 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,580 views12 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Poll

🏢 Вы все уже знаете да, что делать, если управляющая компания предъявила протокол собрания, которого жильцы не проводили?

  1. Только обращаться в суд и признавать протокол недействительным42%
  2. Требовать проверки в жилищной инспекции, которая вправе сама выявлять признаки ничтожности57%
  3. Смириться, ведь подписанный протокол имеет законную силу1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁8👍3🔥1

16 Oct 2026, 12:35 UTC≈3,690 views84 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Госдума разрешила банкам передавать тайну и персональные данные клиентов сторонним ИТ-компаниям. Подрядчики обязаны размещать системы в РФ, защищать данные и проходить аудит ФСБ/ФСТЭК. За утечки несут ответственность банк и подрядчик. Передача данных иностранным банкам — только после согласования.

👎75😁9

15 Oct 2026, 09:42 UTC≈3,240 views34 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Video

ТВОЁ ТЕЛО — ЭТО ПОСЛЕДНЯЯ КРЕПОСТЬ, КОТОРУЮ ОНИ ХОТЯТ ЗАХВАТИТЬ 🛡 Вы уже знаете, что банковская система — это глобальный мыльный пузырь. Вы понимаете, как работают юридические ловушки. Но задумывались ли вы, что Big Pharma — это такая же афера, как и кредитная кабала? 🗝️ Вас приучили, что после 40 лет «болеть — это нормально», а таблетки — это пожизненный налог на существование. Хватит платить дань системе! Меня …

🔥16👍8💯5🤝2😁2👎1

9 Oct 2026, 12:07 UTC≈6,120 views70 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

⚡️ ДОЛГИ ПО ЖКХ СРОКОМ ГОДНОСТИ ВЕЧНОСТЬ? ВЕРХОВНЫЙ СУД НЕ СОГЛАСИЛСЯ! У фондов капремонта была удобная привычка — годами таскать старые долги из одной квитанции в другую. Купил квартиру? Получи «подарок» от прежнего собственника! Но Верховный суд РФ поддержал решение, которым фонд обязали убрать из платёжек задолженность за пределами трёхлетнего срока исковой давности. ⚖️ Что произошло? Фонд капремонта выставлял…

👍61💯5😁3👎1

7 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC≈3,700 views30 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Photo

⚖️ Ваша честь, нейросеть уже всё написала «Гражданин», пока вы собираете справки и переживаете за исход дела, судебная система готовится обзавестись помощником, который не просит отпуск и печатает быстрее секретаря. По данным «Коммерсанта», концепция внедрения ИИ в судопроизводство предусматривает, что к 2030 году более 95% российских судей будут пользоваться ИИ-сервисами. А доля проектов процессуальных документов,…

👍22💯3😁3👎2

6 Oct 2026, 06:48 UTC≈3,270 views10 reactionsread 25 October 2026
Poll

🤖 А вы в курсе, какую роль готовят искусственному интеллекту в российских судах к 2030 году?

  1. Самостоятельно выносить решения по простым делам.52%
  2. Помогать судье готовить проекты документов с обязательной проверкой результата.37%
  3. Только записывать заседания — подготовку документов ему не доверят.11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👎5😁5

30 Sept 2026, 10:08 UTC≈4,870 views11 reactionsread 25 October 2026

Не догонять суд, а создавать адвокатский ИИ-контур https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/ne-dogonyat-sud-a-sozdavat-advokatskiy-ii-kontur/ Зачем адвокатуре собственная стратегия разработки и внедрения искусственного интеллекта Благодарствуем что вы с нами. Листайте закреп, там удобная навигация,и ещё есть чат-бот консультант «Подручный Юрист | Нейросеть»

🤝8👎3

24 Sept 2026, 14:00 UTC≈6,440 views35 reactionsread 25 October 2026

⚡️При банкротстве россиян начали проверять их расходы на такси, рестораны, гаджеты и поездки. Банки все чаще изучают личные траты должников, чтобы доказать их платежеспособность. Так, в Петербурге суд запросил у сервисов данные о заказах еды, каршеринге и путешествиях банкрота и его супруги. Кредиторы отслеживают даже соцсети: в одном из дел суду предоставили фото техники Apple, дорогих поездок и брекетов должницы. …

😁31🤝4

23 Sept 2026, 06:12 UTC≈5,810 views13 reactionsread 25 October 2026

ВС пояснил нюансы оспаривания кредитного договора, заключенного под влиянием телефонных мошенников https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/vs-poyasnil-nyuansy-osparivaniya-kreditnogo-dogovora-zaklyuchennogo-pod-vliyaniem-telefonnykh-moshennikov/ 25 августа Верховный Суд вынес Определение по делу № 18-КГ26-59-К4, в котором разъяснено, что суд должен принимать во внимание при рассмотрении дел об оспаривании заключения догово…

🔥10🤝2😁1

19 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC≈5,520 viewsread 25 October 2026

Пропал вклад на 14 млн рублей: банк не признал получение денег, но суд поддержал обманутого клиента | Юридическая консультация Геннадия Ефремова | Дзен https://dzen.ru/a/ap-faQQUCWUL3kwm

17 Sept 2026, 05:44 UTC≈5,100 views34 reactionsread 25 October 2026

⚖️ ИИ приходит в российское судопроизводство Верховный Суд РФ утвердил Концепцию внедрения технологий искусственного интеллекта в судопроизводство Российской Федерации. 📌 Приказ Верховного Суда РФ от 03.09.2026 № 59-П Главный принцип концепции — использование возможностей ИИ для повышения эффективности работы судов при сохранении ключевой роли судьи в принятии решений. Что планируется внедрить? 🔹 Интеллектуальна…

👎20🔥12😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @agent_svobodi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Oct 2026, 13:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz310 voters

🏢 Вы все уже знаете да, что делать, если управляющая компания предъявила протокол собрания, которого жильцы не проводили?

  1. Только обращаться в суд и признавать протокол недействительным42%
  2. Требовать проверки в жилищной инспекции, которая вправе сама выявлять признаки ничтожности57%
  3. Смириться, ведь подписанный протокол имеет законную силу1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Oct 2026, 06:48 UTCAnonymous Quiz344 voters

🤖 А вы в курсе, какую роль готовят искусственному интеллекту в российских судах к 2030 году?

  1. Самостоятельно выносить решения по простым делам.52%
  2. Помогать судье готовить проекты документов с обязательной проверкой результата.37%
  3. Только записывать заседания — подготовку документов ему не доверят.11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 22 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Postnikov
@VPostn · 5,066
#1
Хранители и Вершители
@alphaingenium · 103,624
#2
Взломай реальность💎
@vzlomayrealnost · 6,341
#3
БАНКСТЕР-НЕТ
@banksternet · 3,756
#4
канал КРЕДИТАМ.НЕТ Максима Шилова
@kreditamnet · 3,219
#5
Приключения Правоведов
@firstchannelforyou · 20,444
#6
Юрист без опыта
@novice_lawyer · 15,309
#7
🪐Вселенная❤️
@DOB_PO · 856
#8
Правовед СПб
@PravovedSPb · 3,187
#9
Коваленко. НОВЫЙ МИРОВОЙ ПОРЯДОК- СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЕ
@n_w_order · 111,631
#10
Юрист. Финансы и право
@rightandlex · 10,206
#11
GigaZnat
@GigaZnat · 3,708
#12
ВОЛЯ - ВОЛЬНЫМ! ПОБЕДА - СИЛЬНЫМ! Марина Варшавская. РОССИЯ Канал: https://t.me/Varshava8888 Чат: https://t.me/+fX6Yz80-
@Varshava8888 · 3,976
#13
Советник. Адвокаты для жизни и бизнеса
@rokasovetnik · 7,910
#14
Владимир Туров | Бизнес и рост
@turov · 49,005
#15
nastya_schaste
@nastya_schaste · 5,927
#16
ЖКХ - хватит
@jkhstop · 4,461
#17
Муравьева | PRO право
@muraveva_infobiz · 2,153
#18
Правовая Школа
@VMomotova2022 · 1,185
#19
Дневник юриста
@dnevnikyurist · 13,513
#20
УЧРЕДИТЕЛИ Государства СССР!
@Rusvelikaja · 4,309
#21
Больше чем юрист Ксения Турусина
@YuristTurusina · 9,970
#22
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,729
#23
Юридическая консультация Геннадия Ефремова
@sovetiadvokata · 46,665
#24
Ваш Юрист
@yuristvlzh · 2,877
#25
ЧТО СКАЗАЛ СУД
@opros_lawyer · 13,238
#26
Юридические новости от PPT.RU
@ppt_ru · 7,220
#27
ХОРОШИЕ НОВОСТИ ДЛЯ ЛЮДЕЙ от Eternal essence и её Eternal values
@OPPTforrussian · 2,585
#28
Центр Прав Человека «1-й Советник» Сергей Васильевич Дубик
@person_sovetnik · 11,677
#29
Сириус 888
@SIRIUS_888 · 60,404
#30
Hyperborea
@hyperboreaX · 58,259
#31
Сопротивление
@afery_uk · 886 (as read 2 September 2026)
#32
Barrrs Group | Канал
@BarrrsGroup · 7,786
#33
Старая🗝️книга
@oldlibrary · 48,373
#34
𝐿𝐸𝑇𝑆_𝐵𝐸𝑇𝑇𝐸𝑅
@lets_better · 6,262 (as read 2 September 2026)
#35
Новости нашего времени
@Novosti_nashego_vremeni · 4,802
#36
АНТАРКТИЧЕСКАЯ ТВАРЬ
@tvartvar · 494
#37
Константин Александрович
@KonstantinAleksandrovich2 · 6,278
#38
ИММУННЫЙ ОТВЕТ
@imotvet · 60,543
#39
[Conspiranews]
@conspiranewschannel · 77,369
#40
~Magic$pirit~ ✨АлхимияОсознанности✨
@MagicSpiritlife · 2,124
#41
Ginie.Gi
@GinieGi · 4,678
#42
Профессиональный рост и развитие
@prosveshenie_pro · 6,749
#43
Tiana Rai
@TianasInsights · 19,641
#44
МКДЭКСПЕРТ - Комплексные решения в ЖКХ и недвижимости
@mkdexpert · 7,391
#45
КПО - Анна Руднева
@anna_kpo · 22,338
#46
Марина Масленникова
@mamaslennikova · 30,074
#47
Алан Мамиев "ЗОВ Предков"
@AlanMamiati · 62,407
#48
• Сила Воля Разум • 🌳
@zemlya_slavyan · 3,641
#49
Иван и Находящиеся В Живых
@ussrmyhause · 3,582
#50
Правосудия.НЕТ
@pravosudija · 6,917
#51
Научно-правовая библиотека
@NP_Biblioteka · 11,989
#52
🔥 О Многом ☀️
@mnogoinf · 2,129
#53
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА
@sudpraktik · 48,930
#54
Цельнозор. Zет - Voйне.
@Celno3or · 4,395
#55
֎SAVe️֍ АРХИВ
@savestudio · 7,105
#56
©™ Евгения Жаркова
@EvgeniaZharkovaLAW · 10,407
#57
ШМАТРИЦА
@real_matrix · 7,436
#58
De Barrrs | Блог
@DeBarrrs · 2,745
#59
Галина Царёва (официальный)
@Galina_Tsareva_official · 67,950
#60
Natashka_111
@Natashka_111 · 10,408
#61
ВСЕВЕДА X-file
@VseWedaX · 3,007
#62
За Славян 🇧🇾🇷🇺🇺🇦
@Za_Slavian · 19,902
#63
Стоппаника
@stoppanika1 · 6,368
#64
Кто в Теме 😂👍💪
@ktovteme1001 · 7,823
#65
Олег Трушкинг (Нараяна) |ВСЕМИРНАЯ СЕМЬЯ СВЯТЫХ #ВСС #WFS
@trushking_wfs · 582 (as read 2 September 2026)
#66
Юрьева Екатерина Проводник к финансам, осознанности, ЛЮБВИ
@yurevaekat · 154
#67
Потому что мы здесь живем
@AV77777AV · 13,882
#68
ИИ зеркало Бытия
@ai_zerkalo · 5,002
#69
Barrrs | Библиотека
@BarrrsLibrary · 3,413
#70
German Citizen
@GermanCitizen · 2,989
#71
Ты ж Юрист
@you_lawyers · 13,739
#72
Сон Разума
@error_288 · 37,761
#73
Максим Шевцов информационный проект #сетевая_партия. Добрая поддержка 2202 2053 4970 7429 "Сбер"
@set_partia · 11,044
#74
Живой Мужчина
@StarostenkoAlexey · 2,323
#75

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Приключения Правоведов
@firstchannelforyou · 20,444
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 September 2026
Юридическая консультация Геннадия Ефремова
@sovetiadvokata · 46,665
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Старая🗝️книга
@oldlibrary · 48,373
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
ДАЧНИК
@dachniikk · 30,959
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Агент свободы | тайный юрист” (@agent_svobodi), 34,661 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agent_svobodi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.