Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Работа в недвижимости | Тамара Высоцкая

Channel

Работа в недвижимости | Тамара Высоцкая

@agentosy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,382subscribers

+139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001366583191
TypeChannel
Username@agentosy
Created24 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/agentosy

Topic

Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,23411,38511,309.56 August 2026 — 11,243 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,243 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,244 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,240 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,234 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,239 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,235 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,237 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,240 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,245 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,252 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,311 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,328 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,327 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,321 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,312 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,311 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,310 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,311 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,309 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,308 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,307 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,312 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,313 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,318 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,323 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,338 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,343 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,350 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,360 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,365 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,363 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,348 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,347 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,350 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,349 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,346 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,343 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,344 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,347 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,344 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,340 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,333 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,328 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,324 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,353 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,355 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,353 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,350 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,344 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,358 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,361 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,379 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,385 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,383 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,382 subscribers11,3826 August 20266 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 92 days, net +139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,211–11,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 15:3711,382-1
5 Nov 2026, 11:4911,383-2
4 Nov 2026, 14:4711,385+6
3 Nov 2026, 16:0511,379+18
2 Nov 2026, 16:4411,361+3
1 Nov 2026, 18:5611,358+14
31 Oct 2026, 17:2511,344-6
30 Oct 2026, 14:2911,350-3
29 Oct 2026, 17:2711,353-2
28 Oct 2026, 16:5011,355+2
27 Oct 2026, 14:1911,353+29
23 Oct 2026, 20:5511,324-4
22 Oct 2026, 22:3011,328-5
21 Oct 2026, 18:0011,333-7
20 Oct 2026, 16:5411,340-4
19 Oct 2026, 15:5611,344-3
18 Oct 2026, 12:3111,347+3
17 Oct 2026, 12:1911,344+1
16 Oct 2026, 15:5011,343-3
14 Oct 2026, 16:0511,346first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.4%
avg views ÷ 11,382 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,330
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held61 (22 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total146,660
Reactions total2,703
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 07:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,780 reactions across 61 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,780100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,780 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.28%
2 of 61 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,700
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,820
over 59 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzqucg38z227 July 202631 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,050 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/13nIEYhm-RM https://vkvideo.ru/video-228735830_456240070

👍21

3 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈12,800 views126 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Где растяпа и тетеря, там не прибыль, а потеря. В связи с последними событиями в сфере Девелопмента, связанными с неисполнением обязательств перед дольщиками, задержкой строительства, и как следствие, удлинением срока выдачи ключей, участились запросы в нашу Компанию с просьбой о помощи, как-то повлиять на застройщиков. Честно, я не понимаю, каким способом и образом мы должны повлиять на застройщиков? Выдачей креди…

👍126

2 Nov 2026, 15:43 UTC≈12,700 views116 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Пробка на въезд в ЖК. Проблема в неправильной организации въезда и выезда с парковки. По правилам сначала выпускают выезжающих с парковки, и потом только впускают въезжающих, если не организовали две полосы движения, и есть одна дорога. Разборки между выезжающими и въезжающими я наблюдаю всякий раз, когда прохожу мимо. Гул клаксонов, крики водителей и жителей жк, пробки на въезд и выезд, и ситуация никак не меняется…

👍116

1 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC≈14,800 views174 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

КЛИЕНТУ НЕ НУЖЕН МИЛЛИОНЕР НАПРОКАТ Агентов недвижимости годами учат продавать себя на первой встрече. Улыбайся, выгляди успешным, демонстрируй уверенность. А вы не задумывались клиенты на самом деле хотят покупать эту картинку? Я специально сделала четыре анонимных опроса в наших Telegram-каналах, чтобы определить, что и кого в действительности хочет видеть потребитель. В каждом участвовали от 1 558 до 2 010 челов…

👍174

28 Oct 2026, 17:23 UTC≈2,590 views100 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Suno написала песню на мои стихи!

👍100

28 Oct 2026, 17:23 UTC≈2,680 views105 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍105

28 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈2,820 views35 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

https://youtu.be/iq9Zr8NYxUQ https://vkvideo.ru/video-228735830_456240059

👍35

26 Oct 2026, 18:29 UTC≈15,800 views385 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

А что я говорила? Несколько лет назад один из известных блогеров на рынке коммерческой недвижимости сначала пришел сам ко мне, а потом прислал свою супругу на консультацию. Задача стояла инвестировать средства в недвижимость. Они оба задали мне один вопрос - что покупать заграницей и где покупать? Они продавали элитную квартиру в Москве и хотели купить недвижимость в ОАЭ, Турции и в Тайланде. Выбирали между этими …

👍385

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @agentosy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@agentosy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тольятти | Интересное | Новости
@tolyatti_life · 22,792
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Работа в недвижимости | Тамара Высоцкая” (@agentosy), 11,382 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agentosy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.