Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آقا ایمان

Channel

آقا ایمان

@aghaimanhadi

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,423subscribers

+3,006 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002406666653
TypeChannel
Username@aghaimanhadi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aghaimanhadi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

9,570 average views per post against 15,423 subscribers — an engagement rate of 62.0%. Across the 6,612 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.86% and 13.5%, with a median of 6.73%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured31 of 31 published in the window (0 exact, 31 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled296,600
Mature posts only79.6% over 18 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers15,423 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 6,612 channels · p10 1.18% · p25 2.86% · p50 6.73% · p75 13.5% · p90 22.5%
Position in cohort99.425th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.191% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 94.4% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,41715,42313,92020 August 2026 — 12,417 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,417 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,042 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,522 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,827 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,872 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,899 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,911 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,928 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,960 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,969 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,973 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,974 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,987 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,982 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,996 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,999 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,013 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,308 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,389 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,414 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,423 subscribers20 August 202619 September 2026
22 measurements spanning 30 days, net +3,006. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,966–15,874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:4115,423+9
16 Sept 2026, 20:4115,414+25
14 Sept 2026, 20:2115,389+81
13 Sept 2026, 08:1615,308+295
11 Sept 2026, 10:4015,013+14
8 Sept 2026, 15:4014,999+3
5 Sept 2026, 07:3714,996+14
3 Sept 2026, 08:3714,982-5
2 Sept 2026, 01:4714,987+13
1 Sept 2026, 01:2714,974+1
30 Aug 2026, 23:5514,973+4
30 Aug 2026, 01:1814,969+9
29 Aug 2026, 00:2414,960+32
27 Aug 2026, 22:0514,928+17
27 Aug 2026, 01:3714,911+12
26 Aug 2026, 04:1614,899+27
25 Aug 2026, 05:5514,872+45
24 Aug 2026, 09:0714,827+305
22 Aug 2026, 17:1514,522+480
21 Aug 2026, 08:5714,042first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.0%
avg views ÷ 15,423 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,570
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held62 (14 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total296,600
Reactions total33,027
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

64,678 reactions across 62 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50,79878.5%
🤣7,98912.4%
💔3,9036.03%
🍓4640.717%
😭3470.537%
🔥2920.451%
👍1830.283%
😍1710.264%
🥰790.122%
👀500.077%
💩440.068%
❤‍🔥370.057%
🤝240.037%
👏230.036%
🌚220.034%
👌210.032%
🐳200.031%
😐200.031%
🤡170.026%
👎160.025%
25 further kinds1580.244%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64,678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 62 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aghaimanhadi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 19:55 UTC≈5,120 views805 reactionsread 3 September 2026

دورتون بگردم چقدر دارین عشق میدین 🫠❤️

775🔥14🍓9🥰4😭2🌚1

2 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC≈5,210 views720 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

دایی منم به عشق شیرجه های خودت تابلو دارم 🥹

695🍓11🔥5👍4🌚3👀2

2 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC≈5,510 views643 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

منم مجسمه گرفتم گذاشتم کتابخونم🫠

625🔥9❤‍🔥5🎉2🌚1👀1

2 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC≈5,550 views668 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

دایی منم همینطوررر عشقیددد

644🔥15🍓7🌚1👀1

2 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC≈5,750 views675 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

منم به عشق شما گوزن دارم

655🍓13🔥41🌚1👀1

2 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC≈5,430 views637 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔥✌️

612🔥16🍓5❤‍🔥2🌚1👀1

2 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC≈5,440 views673 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

دایی ایمان منم یه بچه گوزن واقعی هستم فقط به عشق گوزن ها دایی ایمان عمو حامد عمو میلاد💙💫✨ مبینا ملقب به بچه گوزن 😂💫

649🔥13🍓7👀3🌚1

2 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC≈5,720 views712 reactionsread 3 September 2026

عاشقتونم که 🫠

697🍓8🔥3👀2🌚1💋1

2 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC≈5,800 views805 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

دایی این تابلو رو من به عشق شما سه نفر کشیدم ❤️🦌

777👌13🔥7👀3😁3🌚2

2 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC≈5,810 views838 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

دایی ولی هر بچه گوزنی بخاطر شما یکی از این گردنبندا داره🫎✨ قبول کن برا منم خوشگله 🎀😂 ایگنور نکن دیگه...تازه دیروز روز دخترم تبریک نگفتیا حواسمون هس😂🥹🎀🔪

800🤣22🍓10🔥4🌚1👀1

2 Sept 2026, 18:06 UTC≈6,260 views998 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

فقط به عشق خودتون🤙🏻🍻

964🔥13👏9💯6👌42

2 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC≈7,020 views1,139 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣1,12014🔥2🌚1👀1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @aghaimanhadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آقا ایمان” (@aghaimanhadi), 15,423 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aghaimanhadi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.