Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 36 days, net +779. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,942–15,955 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 05:15
15,838
+251
8 Sept 2026, 08:38
15,587
+4
5 Sept 2026, 04:01
15,583
+183
3 Sept 2026, 09:32
15,400
+4
2 Sept 2026, 06:34
15,396
-3
31 Aug 2026, 02:12
15,399
+5
30 Aug 2026, 04:37
15,394
+1
29 Aug 2026, 01:56
15,393
+3
28 Aug 2026, 01:57
15,390
-15
27 Aug 2026, 00:17
15,405
+8
26 Aug 2026, 00:24
15,397
+6
24 Aug 2026, 22:03
15,391
+30
23 Aug 2026, 07:54
15,361
+114
21 Aug 2026, 20:36
15,247
+30
20 Aug 2026, 17:13
15,217
-38
19 Aug 2026, 16:46
15,255
+9
18 Aug 2026, 17:08
15,246
+6
17 Aug 2026, 17:48
15,240
+3
16 Aug 2026, 15:56
15,237
+16
14 Aug 2026, 22:03
15,221
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.3%
avg views ÷ 15,838 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,900
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
50 (21 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
141,640
Reactions total
5,010
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 50s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,630 reactions across 50 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,590
43.2%
🔥
3,233
30.4%
🤬
1,681
15.8%
🤣
978
9.20%
👎
148
1.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,630 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❗️😊 Агитбот 2.0 — встречайте глобальное обновление: поиск сразу по всем разделам и ответы разговорного ИИ
Мы постоянно получаем предложения о том, чтобы Агитбот мог отвечать сам на любой вопрос. Вы просили — мы сделали! Рассказываем о принципиально новом функционале:
— Раньше в Агитботе приходилось искать материал отдельно по 4 разным разделам: по мифам, терминам, цитатам классиков марксизма и фрагментам левого Ют…
🖊 Искусственный интеллект и война
Прогресс в автоматизации, который даёт человечеству искусственный интеллект, находит своё отражение не только в производственных цепочках. Как и любые инновации, капиталисты первым делом активно применяют его в военном деле.
❗️ Не так давно Пентагон заключил масштабные соглашения с ведущими разработчиками искусственного интеллекта в США о внедрении их технологий в закрытые и засекр…
Рыба — на экспорт, сахар — детям
Абсолютно закономерное для капиталистической системы признание прозвучало на Восточном экономическом форуме (ВЭФ). Академик РАН и президент Союза педиатров России Лейла Намазова-Баранова заявила, что российские дети страдают от хронической нехватки белка, в первую очередь — рыбного.
Оказывается, массовая тяга школьников к сладкому — это не просто «вредная привычка» или результат агр…
«Главное отличие — это необходимость работать, а не болтать». Представитель АМБ о разрозненности левых, Агитботе и том, почему кружки себя изжили
«Диалектик» поговорил с представителем АМБ — одного из заметных коллективов в русскоязычном марксистском пространстве. АМБ известна прежде всего своими практическими инструментами: Агитботом и картой литературных кружков. В условиях, когда левые группы часто дублируют друг…
📝 Пакт Молотова-Риббентропа: мировое значение и последствия
⚫️ Как западные империалисты поощряли нацистский милитаризм в Европе?
⚫️Как СССР последовательно противостоял немецкой экспансии?
⚫️Почему мы должны не стыдиться пакта Молотова-Риббентропа, а гордиться им?
✊ Читайте ответы на эти вопросы в нашей статье
🖊 Как бы работали пожарные при анархо-капитализме на примере Марка Лициния Красса
Марк Лициний Красс — важный человек в истории Древнего Рима. Он жил в первом веке до нашей эры, делил власть с Юлием Цезарем вплоть до своей смерти и был богатейшим гражданином умирающей республики.
⚫️ Как же он нажил своё состояние?
Красс родился в знатной и богатой семье. Своё восхождение он начал с поддержки первого диктатора Рим…
🖊 Экспансия торгового капитала
Либеральная сказка о том, что каждый предприимчивый индивид способен легко открыть кофейню и ворваться в бизнес-элиту на правах нового «атланта» подошел к концу. В условиях монополизации свободный рынок остается только в учебнике экономики, в то время как реальная практика диктуется правом сильного.
Наблюдаемая сегодня динамика на рынке готового кофе и общественного питания в России …
Левое информационное поле облетела новость о самороспуске организации «Союз маоистов Урала». Согласно опубликованному протоколу, 21 августа в Челябинске оставшиеся участники единогласно проголосовали за полное прекращение политической деятельности, сославшись на фактический распад структуры, невозможность вести работу и личное желание активистов отойти от дел.
Одноименный Telegram-канал, которым последние полгода и …
🖊 Илон Маск заработал за год в 2,5 миллиона раз больше, чем среднестатистический сотрудник Tesla.
Он получил от Tesla впечатляющую выплату в 158 млрд долларов за 2025 год при средней зарплате в компании в 60 тысяч долларов. Совокупное состояние самого богатого человека на планете превышает триллион долларов — это два годовых бюджета Российской Федерации или чуть больше трети ВВП нашей страны. Для наглядности: на май…
В канале «Русской общины Петрограда» (филиал небезызвестной консервативно-националистической организации) вовсю крутится реклама Московского технологического института. Казалось бы, где «традиционные ценности», а где дистанционное обучение в частном вузе за 7500 рублей в месяц? Но на деле здесь всё логично.
Нам продают не квалификацию, а максимально необременительный путь к заветной «корочке» государственного образц…
📝 Мировой миграционный кризис: истоки и выгодоприобретатели
⚫️Какие причины миграции?
⚫️Кто зарабатывает на ней?
✊ Читайте ответы на эти и другие вопросы в нашем материале
«Нет забастовок законных, есть успешные»
Как отстаивать свои права, если право на забастовку фактически парализовано? Почему борьбы «за копейку» недостаточно? Что мешает российскому рабочему осознать свою коллективную силу? Есть ли реальный толк от левых организаций и депутатов в трудовых конфликтах? Сколько тысяч людей уже состоят в реальных профсоюзах?
На эти и другие вопросы отвечает Сергей Храмов — основатель п…
👍122🔥42👎5
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @agitbrigade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@agitbrigade edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сохранение диктатуры капитала (при моей жизни система не изменится)29%
Узнать результаты8%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Думай сам/Думай сейчас. @dumai_sam_i_sei4as · 29,461 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Простые числа @primenumbers2021 · 68,540 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
АГИТПРОП @Agitblog · 109,392 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
Профсоюз работников IT @ruitunion · 35,796 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АМБ” (@agitbrigade), 15,838 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agitbrigade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.