⚡️ Александра уже в эфире Подключайтесь 👉 https://agkedu.getcourse.ru/meeting_020926_2

Channel
Александра Горева-Куртышева
@agk_edu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,843subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001472068728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @agk_edu |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/agk_edu |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 17,843 | +11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 17,832 | +15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 17,817 | +18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 17,799 | -13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 17,812 | +17 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 17,795 | -14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 17,809 | -20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:08 | 17,829 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:52 | 17,853 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 17,875 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 17,881 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 17,890 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 17,907 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 17,913 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 17,923 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 17,917 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 17,916 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 17,915 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 17,924 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 17,921 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.29%
- avg views ÷ 17,843 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 230
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.49%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (21 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,531 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 51m 13s
- Average length
- 5m 41s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
690 reactions across 37 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 360 | 52.2% | |
| 🔥 | 180 | 26.1% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 9.71% | |
| 🤩 | 45 | 6.52% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 2.32% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 1.59% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.87% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 705 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 43 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @agk_edu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
❗️ В 18:00 МСК встречаемся на финальном эфире бизнес-лагеря 🔥 Сегодня обсудим, как эксперту монетизировать накопленный опыт без постоянного роста нагрузки и выгорания Встреча будет полезна всем — даже если вы не участвовали в бизнес-лагере или не успели выполнить задания. Будет что забрать в работу уже сегодня 😉 👉 ССЫЛКА НА ВХОД
Как вырасти в 2 раза, не проводя в 2 раза больше консультаций Покажу на реальном кейсе моей ученицы 😎 Марина Трущенкова — подростковый психолог, руководитель Центра психологической поддержки «Подросток» Когда Марина пришла в мою программу, у неё уже была очень сильная частная практика: больше 5000 консультаций, магистратура по психологии, кандидатская степень, многолетняя специализация на кризисных детско-родитель…
👏2❤1👍1
Как эксперту и предпринимателю достойно зарабатывать без выгорания Предлагаю быструю ревизию. Пройдитесь по пунктам и посчитайте, сколько раз ответ будет «я» ➖ Кто отвечает новым клиентам на первые вопросы, рассказывает про тарифы и помогает записаться? ➖ Кто напоминает об оплате, встречах и собирает организационные вопросы? ➖ Кто проводит первичную диагностику каждого клиента? ➖ Кто отвечает на типовые вопросы вну…
❤2👍2🔥1
Ваш топовый продукт может стать причиной выгорания В прошлых постах мы разобрались с самым очевидным решением — убрать из своего дня всё, что давно можно делегировать. Казалось бы, наняли ассистента, перестали сами собирать презентации и отвечать на организационные сообщения и можно выдохнуть Но есть задачка посложнее. Выгорание может быть уже зашито в вашу продуктовую линейку Например: у вас отличный продукт, он …
👏2
«Это про меня» — если после последних постов узнавали себя, не потеряйте анкету на новый поток. Всё подробности выше 👆
Готовила для вас пост, как эксперту больше зарабатывать и не превращать каждый следующий рост в ещё большее количество собственных рабочих часов... И случилось очень своевременное продолжение этой темы )) У нас прошла первая оплата нового потока курса «Менторинг». Причём сразу VIP-тарифа 🔥 Открытые продажи мы ещё даже не начинали и анкету планировали дать чуть позже, но раз закрытая часть продаж уже фактически нача…
❤2🥰2🔥1
Где ваша экспертиза создаёт самую большую ценность В продолжении поста про дорогие и дешёвые компетенции... Допустим, вы действительно убрали из своей недели всё, что давно можно было передать, автоматизировать или просто перестать делать И освободили те самые 10–20 часов. Что дальше? Потому что свободное время само по себе ещё не увеличивает доход )) Если в дорогих компетенциях — стратегия, создание продуктов, с…
👍3🔥3❤1🥰1
Сколько часов в неделю вы работаете НИЖЕ реальной стоимости своей экспертизы?😎🔥 В бизнес-лагере началась активная работа. В первом задании участники делили свои компетенции на дорогие и дешёвые и считали, сколько времени можно освободить, если перестать делать самостоятельно то, что не требует их экспертного уровня Я пошла в чат смотреть ответы и зависла на цифрах. От 6 до 24 часов в неделю. У кого-то 48–72. Прич…
🔥6🤩2👍1
Universal уничтожил собственный хит До Гарри Поттера на месте Косого переулка больше 20 лет жил один из самых узнаваемых аттракционов — Jaws, те самые «Челюсти» Лодка, туристы, внезапно появляющаяся из воды огромная акула, взрывы — классика старого Universal. 2 января 2012 года аттракцион провёл свой последний рейс. На следующий день всю тематическую зону Amity закрыли стенами и начали сносить А в 2014 году ровно …
🔥4❤2
Зачем Universal строят уже 35 лет, если люди и так туда едут? Последние дни отпуска мы провели в Юниверсал во Флориде. В самом большом комплексе парков, который развивается на одной территории уже 35 лет Первый Universal Studios Florida открылся здесь в 1990 году. Через девять лет рядом построили второй парк — Islands of Adventure. Потом появились новые отели, отдельный аквапарк, огромные тематические миры, а в 202…
🔥10❤5
«Саша, это надо было делать платно» Так написала участница вчерашнего первого эфира бизнес-лагеря. И судя по остальным отзывам, встреча получилась очень полезной ❤️ Спасибо всем, кто был онлайн, включался в обсуждения и оставил обратную связь Запись эфира уже доступна участникам бизнес-лагеря. Ещё можно присоединиться, посмотреть первый эфир в записи и продолжить работу вместе с нами 👉 ПРИСОЕДИНИТЬСЯ И ПОСМОТРЕТЬ…
❤6👍3🎉2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @agk_edu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@agk_edu edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@valentin_shishkin · 25,831
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
@trusprobusiness · 37,739
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@tm_producer · 31,380
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Александра Горева-Куртышева” (@agk_edu), 17,843 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agk_edu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.