Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Agriculture Systems

Channel

Agriculture Systems

@agriculturesystems

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001253389395
TypeChannel
Username@agriculturesystems
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/agriculturesystems

Growth

136137136.51 Sept 2026, 14:45 — 136 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 15:00 — 136 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 09:12 — 137 subscribers1 Sept 2026, 14:452 Sept 2026, 09:12
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 09:12137+1
1 Sept 2026, 15:00136no change
1 Sept 2026, 14:45136first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
395.1%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
541
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held20 (24 April 20261 September 2026)
Views total3,248
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC15 viewsread 1 September 2026

گزارش ویژه: وقتی خاک مسموم می‌شود؛ گندم سیاه و راهکارهای نوین برای #امنیت غذایی در بحران #هسته‌ای به گزارش کانال نظامی‌ترین نویسنده: comet 📌 مقدمه: فراتر از انفجار وقتی از #جنگ #هسته‌ای صحبت می‌کنیم، ذهن اغلب به سمت انفجار، موج گرما و تشعشعات آنی می‌رود. اما یک تهدید خاموش و طولانی‌مدت وجود دارد که شاید خطرناک‌تر باشد: گرسنگی. تصور کنید خاکی که قرن‌ها غذا تولید کرده، حالا سمی شده است. نور خورشید پشت ابرهای دود پنها

1 Sept 2026, 09:11 UTC20 viewsread 1 September 2026

سه محور استراتژیک برای بقا با توجه به آنچه گفته شد، نقشه راه تأمین غذا در دوران پس از بحران هسته‌ای بر سه پایه استوار است: - ذخیره‌سازی راهبردی:ایجاد انبارهای امن از محصولات مقاوم مانند گندم سیاه، کنسروها و حبوبات خشک. این‌ها خط اول دفاعی در روزهای ابتدایی هستند. - تولید داخلی مقاوم: ترویج کشت گندم سیاه در مناطق مستعد، آموزش کشاورزان برای استفاده از کودهای پتاسه جهت خنثی‌سازی آلودگی، و آمادگی برای کشت در شرایط ن

1 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTCviews —

Agriculture Systems pinned «📌🚨📢 کشاورزی نوین در چین: وقتی مزرعه به آزمایشگاه تبدیل می‌شود نویسنده: comet چین با جمعیتی بیش از ۱.۴ میلیارد نفر، یکی از دشوارترین چالش‌های جهان را پیش رو دارد: تأمین غذای کافی برای جمعیتی عظیم، با زمین‌های کشاورزی محدود. پاسخ این کشور به این معضل، نه…»

1 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 1 September 2026

📌🚨📢 کشاورزی نوین در چین: وقتی مزرعه به آزمایشگاه تبدیل می‌شود نویسنده: comet چین با جمعیتی بیش از ۱.۴ میلیارد نفر، یکی از دشوارترین چالش‌های جهان را پیش رو دارد: تأمین غذای کافی برای جمعیتی عظیم، با زمین‌های کشاورزی محدود. پاسخ این کشور به این معضل، نه در گسترش سطح زیر کشت، بلکه در تحول دیجیتال و فناورانه‌ی کشاورزی خلاصه شده است. امروزه در مزارع چین، به جای بیل و داس، پهپاد، ربات و الگوریتم‌های هوش مصنوعی به کار گ

27 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC35 viewsread 1 September 2026

· مصرف علف‌کش را تا ۷۰ درصد کاهش داد. · مصرف کود را تا ۴۵ درصد کاهش داد. · و عملکرد محصول را تا ۱۰ درصد افزایش داد . این یعنی یک پیروزی کامل برای محیط زیست و جیب کشاورز. 💬 ربات‌های مشاور؛ وقتی تلگرام به کمک کشاورز می‌آید حتی پلتفرم‌های ساده‌ای مثل تلگرام هم در کشاورزی نوین نقش دارند. تحقیقات جدید نشان داده که استفاده از گروه‌های گفت‌وگو و ربات‌های مشاور برای سلامت گیاهان، می‌تواند الگویی موفق از حوزه سلامت انسانی

27 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC26 viewsread 1 September 2026

کشاورزی نوین؛ سفری از مزرعه تا فضا نویسنده: Comet منتشر شده در: کانال Agriculture Systems پیوند کانال: https://t.me/agriculturesystems 🌱 مقدمه: کشاورزی در آستانه یک انقلاب خاموش تصویر کشاورزی دیگر تنها یک تراکتور در دشت بی‌انتها و یک پیرمرد خوش‌بخت با کلاه حصیری نیست. امروز، در مزارع پیشرفته، سنسورها نفس گیاهان را اندازه می‌گیرند، ماهواره‌ها از سلامت خاک گزارش می‌دهند و هوش مصنوعی تصمیم می‌گیرد که چه زمانی و چه م

27 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC22 viewsread 1 September 2026

Agricultural Systems Management - Missouri Valley University https://www.moval.edu/academics/academic-schools/school-of-science-agriculture/agricultural-systems-management/ https://t.me/agriculturesystems

13 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC35 viewsread 1 September 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Db21Gy4sjUi/?igsh=amdib3FjNmxyNHp1

25 Jun 2026, 21:47 UTC110 viewsread 1 September 2026

📢 گزارش کانال Agriculture Systems https://t.me/agriculturesystems تاریخ: ۲۶ ژوئن ۲۰۲۶ موضوع: تحولات تکنولوژی در کشاورزی ۲۰۲۶ دوستان عزیز کانال Agriculture Systems، سلام! در این گزارش به بررسی مهم‌ترین تحولات تکنولوژی در کشاورزی در سال ۲۰۲۶ می‌پردازیم. سالی که تکنولوژی از یک ابزار کمکی به یک ضرورت حیاتی برای بقای مزارع تبدیل شده است. بخش اول: انقلاب داده‌های کشاورزی در سال ۲۰۲۶، تمرکز اصلی صنعت از جمع‌آوری داده‌ه

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @agriculturesystems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Agriculture Systems” (@agriculturesystems), 137 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agriculturesystems.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.