🔴В 2025 году Россияне заработали 5,3 млрд рублей на арбитраже криптовалют По данным Минфин 32% граждан покинули своё место работы, поскольку в среднем уже в первый месяц тут можно зарабатывать от 140 000 рублей, а через 2-3 месяца с легкостью выйти на семизначные числа. Самое смешное, что лишь 8% россиян что-то слышали об этой профессии, хотя все инструкции бесплатно лежат на канале «Арбитраж Криптовалют» Там объя…
Views per post sit far below this size band
42.5 average views per post against 33,085 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.128%. Across the 8,451 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,626–99,988 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.06% and 21.1%, with a median of 10.4%.
| Window | 30 days (12 August 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 226 of 226 published in the window (226 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 9,600 |
| Mature posts only | 0.134% over 205 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 33,085 measured 9 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b31623:rus · 8,451 channels · p10 2.48% · p25 5.06% · p50 10.4% · p75 21.1% · p90 35.4% |
| Position in cohort | 0.343th percentile · 1/83 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.087% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
