AI для Разработки — Claude | Cursor | Copilot pinned a photo

Channel
AI для Разработки — Claude | Cursor | Copilot
@ai_for_dev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
914subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001919589336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ai_for_dev |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ai_for_dev |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 914 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 918 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 928 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 935 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 939 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 940 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 940 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 01s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
AI для Разработки — Claude | Cursor | Copilot pinned «Свой кодинг-ассистент за 4.5 гига Появилась милая локальная моделька Gemma4-12B-Coder для Python — работает без интернета, без облака и без единого запроса к API. Всё своё, всё приватное. Железо почти не нужно: хватает ~4.5 ГБ VRAM или unified-памяти. Сомневаетесь…»
AI для Разработки — Claude | Cursor | Copilot pinned a video
AI для Разработки — Claude | Cursor | Copilot pinned «10 репозиториев, которые грех не закинуть в закладки Всё бесплатное, всё open-source, всё уже на GitHub: • OmniRoute — одна точка входа к сотням AI-провайдеров, жмёт токены и сам переключается, если что-то отвалилось. • OfficeCLI — рулим Word, Excel и PowerPoint…»
AI для Разработки — Claude | Cursor | Copilot pinned a video
Почему ИИ-пилот живёт, а продакшен умирает Классика жанра: команда показала пилот, заказчику зашло, модель что-то считает и прогнозирует. А потом это пытаются масштабировать — и оно разваливается. Не из-за модели. Из-за данных. Главная мысль разбора: ИИ не упирается ни в фреймворк, ни в железо. Он упирается в то, что инфраструктура данных компании в принципе не рассчитана кормить алгоритм в реальном времени. Данные…
Домашняя ИИ-лаба за 200к: 2× Tesla V100 и 128 бенчмарков Ребята устали слушать «локальный LLM-сервер — это дорого и сложно» и просто собрали его сами. Результат — подробный разбор на Хабре и открытый репозиторий со всеми цифрами. Что по железу: - 64 ГБ VRAM с двух V100 32GB — как три RTX 5080, только дешевле - тянет модели вплоть до 70B AWQ через TP=2 - 200к — не «копейки», но в этом сегменте по VRAM конкурентов на…
ИИ разбирает падения тестов — но есть нюанс Нейросети завалили нас кодом: пишем быстрее, коммитим больше. А QA как разгребал завалы, так и разгребает — пропускная способность не выросла. Тестировщикам для ИИ-помощников нужно куда больше контекста и инфраструктуры. Автор показывает больную точку: время ручного разбора зависит от числа падений, а не от числа причин. Сто одинаковых падений — сто разборов. И auto-debug…
«Давайте просто прикрутим сюда LLM» — и вот у вас бот за 15 минут 🔥 Проблема только одна: половина этих ботов не окупается. И, как отмечает автор (бизнес-архитектор), дело не в 'слабой' модели, а в том, что архитектуру и процессы вокруг неё нормально не спроектировали, а данных контекста просто нет. Пара болей из статьи: Бот ради галочки. «У всех есть, и мы сделаем». Итог из жизни: магазин вложил больше миллиона р…
Говорилка от NVIDIA, которая сама дёргает тулзы NVIDIA выкатила Nemotron VoiceChat — первый открытый голосовой агент, который прямо в разговоре лезет в интернет и календарь. То есть болтаешь с ним, а он между делом гуглит и что-то планирует. Красота. Что по фичам: • Говорит как человек — с эмоциями, без неловких пауз. • Можно перебивать на лету, реагирует за 480 мс. • Слушать, говорить, прерывать и вызывать инстру…
Агенту мало сказать «поправь код» — ему нужен harness Пока репозиторий маленький, всё просто: кинул задачу, агент почитал код, поменял пару файлов, прогнал тесты. А в реальном проде начинается веселье: где границы изменения, кто владеет поведением, кого сломает правка контракта, какие инварианты трогать нельзя. Автор называет среду вокруг агента harness — систему, которая превращает «хочу вот так» в аккуратное, вос…
Тысячи анимаций забесплатно — встречайте Originkit Вышла Originkit — бесплатная библиотека анимированных компонентов, которая реально экономит часы вёрстки. • Найдётся почти всё: курсоры, фоны, тексты, сложная анимация. • Любой элемент кидаете в проект в один клик. • Дружит с React и Framer — вставляете в готовый проект, и ничего не разваливается. • За секунду цепляется к Claude Code и Codex — берёте ассеты не выхо…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ai_for_dev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@techno_novinki · 24,393
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI для Разработки — Claude | Cursor | Copilot” (@ai_for_dev), 914 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ai_for_dev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.