Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐™–๐™ž๐™˜๐™๐™ช๐™›๐™ž๐™ก๐™ข๐™จ

Channel

๐™–๐™ž๐™˜๐™๐™ช๐™›๐™ž๐™ก๐™ข๐™จ

@aichufilms

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

101subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003929284946
TypeChannel
Username@aichufilms
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 2 August 2026 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aichufilms

Growth

69101858 August 2026 โ€” 69 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 70 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 70 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 76 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 89 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 93 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 101 subscribers8 August 20267 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 30 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 64โ€“106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 21:19101+8
30 Aug 2026, 21:2693+4
23 Aug 2026, 12:5489+13
16 Aug 2026, 17:4676+6
9 Aug 2026, 23:4670no change
9 Aug 2026, 07:5270+1
8 Aug 2026, 18:1669first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
16.5%
avg views รท 101 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
40.5%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held16 (2 August 2026 โ€“ 9 August 2026)
Views total50
Reactions total17
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

94 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค2021.3%
๐Ÿ’˜2021.3%
๐Ÿ“1313.8%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1212.8%
๐Ÿ”ฅ88.51%
๐Ÿ’‹77.45%
๐Ÿ˜44.26%
๐Ÿ’…33.19%
๐Ÿณ22.13%
๐Ÿ’ฏ22.13%
๐Ÿ•Š22.13%
๐Ÿ‘พ11.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for ยท 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @aichufilms. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC8 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @aframsfxx

sinemvix babaozana pvmdwmic olyixxhp fanc1x serwelx l1naxs edits1ae merrtix fimrimmm cemrxl atakfate askmeloks aichufilms qagvisar turdalli amphiae

9 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC22 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

my sunshine โ˜€๏ธ

๐Ÿ’˜5โค4

9 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC18 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

legendary lovers ๐Ÿ–ค

๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿ’ฏ2

9 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC15 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dvmltxVideo

ะฐะปัŒั ะฒัะตะณะดะฐ ะฒ ะฟั€ะฐะนะผะต scp:lina๐Ÿคrm:courtblyn #alyaalbora #uzaksehir

โค1

9 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC30 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

happy daha17 day ๐Ÿฉต

๐Ÿ•Š2๐Ÿ˜1

8 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @aimiyxsiPhoto

Interactive from @aimiyxsi ๐Ÿš ะฃัะปะพะฒะธั: -ะฟะพะดะฟะธัะบะฐ ะฝะฐ @aimiyxsi -ั€ะตะฟะพัั‚ ัั‚ะพะณะพ ะฟะพัั‚ะฐ ะฒ ัะฒะพะน ั‚ะณะบ -ัะบะธะฝัƒั‚ัŒ ัะบั€ะธะฝั‹, ัŽะท ะฒะฐัˆะตะณะพ ั‚ะณะบ ะฒ ะบะพะผะผ ะฟะพะด ัั‚ะพั‚ ะฟะพัั‚ ะฟะพะบะฐ ะบะพะปะธั‡ะตัั‚ะฒะพ ัƒั‡ะฐัั‚ะฝะธะบะพะฒ ะฝะต ะพะณั€ะฐะฝะธั‡ะตะฝะพ)

7 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC114 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ะผะพะน ะฑะพัั, ะฝะฐั‡ะฐะปัŒะฝะธะบ scp: @qwjotwscp tt link #edits

๐Ÿ”ฅ6โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4โค3๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿ“1๐Ÿ’‹1

5 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC83 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

she should be a model ๐ŸŒŠ

โค7๐Ÿ“3๐Ÿ’…3๐Ÿ’‹3๐Ÿ’˜3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿณ2๐Ÿ”ฅ2

3 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC112 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿค๐Ÿป๐Ÿ’•

๐Ÿ“2๐Ÿ’‹1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @aichufilms. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐™–๐™ž๐™˜๐™๐™ช๐™›๐™ž๐™ก๐™ข๐™จโ€ (@aichufilms), 101 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aichufilms.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.