Channel
@aiinbox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
128subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002654933336 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aiinbox |
| Description | Best Reads and Links of AI Era Have FUN with AI, not Just read News Be Resourceful From @productinbox Family |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 2 May 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aiinbox |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:23 | 128 | no change |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:48 | 128 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 82.6% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 5.80% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2025 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
توییت اصلی (@rohanpaul_ai) داره درباره یه مقاله جالب از گوگل دیپمایند حرف میزنه که نشون میده اگه پرامپت (دستور/سؤالت) رو دوبار پشت سر هم کپی کنی و بفرستی برای مدلهای زبانی (LLM)، دقتشون روی خیلی از کارها به شدت میره بالا — بدون اینکه هیچ هزینه یا تأخیر اضافهای داشته باشه. نکات کلیدی که گفته: - مدلهای معمولی (causal LM) متن رو از چپ به راست میخونن → کلمات اول قبل از اینکه بقیه متن رو ببینن پردازش میشن و گاه…
❤5👍1
OpenClaw Architecture, Explained https://mjdz.ir/s/aWl47 @aiinbox
🔥3
Spotify says its best developers haven't written a line of code since December, thanks to AI | TechCrunch Spotify credits Claude Code and its internal AI system Honk with speeding up development. https://mjdz.ir/s/QLZ2b @aiinbox
❤4
پروژه OpenClaw (github.com/openclaw/openclaw) یه AI agent محلی و open-source هست که دستیار شخصی AI رو روی دستگاه خودت (مثل Mac، Linux یا حتی Docker) اجرا میکنه. 82 37 این پروژه از نوامبر ۲۰۲۵ (اواخر آبان ۱۴۰۴) شروع شده و خالقش Peter Steinberger (@steipete) هست که قبلاً PSPDFKit رو ساخته. 82 9 تعداد ستارههاش الان حدود ۱۸۹k هست (با ۳۱.۹k فورک و ۵۱۹ contributor فعال)، و از ۹k ستاره در اوایل ژانویه ۲۰۲۶ به این عدد در ۶…
❤3
پست اصلی توی توییتر (X) از اکانت رسمی @stitchbygoogle هست و داره یه فیچر جدید از ابزار Stitch (محصول Google Labs) رو معرفی میکنه. به زبان ساده چی میگه: معرفی کردن Ideate agent (عامل ایدهپردازی) داخل Stitch. میگه این ابزار رو اول پروژه استفاده کن تا ببینی چه گزینههایی ممکنه، قبل از اینکه روی یه راهحل نهایی زوم کنی. این «دوست طراح» توئه که: - از وب اطلاعات و کانتکست جمع میکنه - استایل سایتهای موجود رو یاد م…
❤4
پست اصلی (از @bridgemindai) داره یه تست جالب و طنزآمیز رو نشون میده: به ۴ تا مدل هوش مصنوعی یه پرامپت ساده داده: «یه تابلوی نئونی با نوشته OPEN به صورت HTML بساز» نتایجش این بوده: - GLM 5 → تمیز و کلاسیک، عالی زده - Claude Opus 4.6 → با افکت درخشش قشنگ، خوب - Gemini 3 Pro → با خط خوش و نورپردازی bloom، خلاقانه - MiniMax M2.5 → نوشته رو به شکل "O b∈ N" (با فاصلههای عجیب و غریب و علامت ∈ به جای P) خراب کرده جالبه…
❤3
Signed Mahdi Majidzadeh
Claude Opus 4.5 Achieves 50%-Time Horizon Of Around 4 hrs 49 Mins — LessWrong An updated METR graph including Claude Opus 4.5 was just published 3 hours ago on X by METR (source): • • Same graph but without the log (source): … https://mjdz.ir/s/3Ooj8 @aiinbox
❤3
Signed Mahdi Majidzadeh
Donating the Model Context Protocol and establishing the Agentic AI Foundation Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that's working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems. https://mjdz.ir/s/38601 @aiinbox
❤3
Signed Mahdi Majidzadeh
100 chats for college students https://mjdz.ir/s/aRVGG @aiinbox
❤3👍1
Signed Mahdi Majidzadeh
Advanced methods for improving product quality with LLM: fine-tuning - GoPractice If you need the highest possible quality in processing specialized data or producing responses that adhere to a complex structure/style, fine-tuning is the best choice. Other methods (RAG, prompt optimization, etc.) cannot surpass fine-tuning in quality. https://mjdz.ir/s/Pm9XD @aiinbox
❤4
Signed Mahdi Majidzadeh
We tested 7 tools for AI prototyping—here are the results - GoPractice Lovable, Bolt, Replit, v0, Tempo Labs, Magic Patterns are AI prototyping tools which allow you to go from idea to working prototype in hours, not weeks. This creates a tremendous advantage for product teams that know how to leverage them. But there are many such tools. How do you figure out which one is best suited for your task? We answered this…
❤4🔥1
Signed Mahdi Majidzadeh
تحلیل با گروک البته خیلی جدی ش نگیرید اینو میتونین توییت کنین سلام گروک @grok چطوری خوبی؟ لطفاً و حتما ۱۰۰۰ پست اخیر من رو بررسی کن (فقط اونهایی که خودم نوشتم ریتوییت ها رو درنظر نگیر) و اونها رو در ۱۰ تا کتگوری مختلف طبقه بندی کن و درصد تقریبی پستهای هر کتگوری رو هم بگو. در ادامه ش ارزیابی کن بر اساس این دسته بندی ها و کمیت شون کیفیت زندگی م چطوره از ۰ که خیلی خسته کننده ست تا ۱۰۰ خیلی هیجان انگیزه @aiinbox
❤4
Signed Mahdi Majidzadeh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aiinbox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AI Inbox” (@aiinbox), 128 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiinbox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.