Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AiPHABET: ART vs Ai

Channel

AiPHABET: ART vs Ai

@aiphabet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,455subscribers

-555 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002456313647
TypeChannel
Username@aiphabet
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 19 February 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aiphabet

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,45511,01010,732.56 August 2026 — 11,010 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,010 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,007 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,994 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,979 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,964 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,955 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,948 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,933 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,919 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,907 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,891 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,872 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,857 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,846 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,831 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,819 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,797 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,774 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,760 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,748 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,741 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,720 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,705 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,694 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,686 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,669 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,659 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,634 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,605 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,561 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,535 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,510 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,479 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,455 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -555. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,372–11,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:2110,455-24
16 Sept 2026, 00:4010,479-31
14 Sept 2026, 05:5810,510-25
12 Sept 2026, 13:1810,535-26
10 Sept 2026, 08:2010,561-44
7 Sept 2026, 06:2010,605-29
4 Sept 2026, 13:1710,634-25
3 Sept 2026, 01:1510,659-10
2 Sept 2026, 00:4810,669-17
31 Aug 2026, 21:4510,686-8
30 Aug 2026, 20:1410,694-11
29 Aug 2026, 17:4510,705-15
28 Aug 2026, 17:0610,720-21
27 Aug 2026, 17:3710,741-7
26 Aug 2026, 17:3910,748-12
25 Aug 2026, 17:2810,760-14
24 Aug 2026, 15:5510,774-23
22 Aug 2026, 22:2310,797-22
21 Aug 2026, 09:1710,819-12
20 Aug 2026, 11:3210,831first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,199 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,41744.3%
❤‍🔥75023.4%
👾62919.7%
🎉2377.41%
👏1665.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,199 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2025 to 2 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
72
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 20 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aiphabet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 February 2025 to 2 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2025, 14:37 UTC≈8,740 views320 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

Missed 🔙⚫️⚫️⚫️🔜 ? After months of haaard work & design routine we are coming to the reveal to the one-of-a-kind projects on TON blockchain. Thanks for being with us, can't wait to share more! 🤯

👾130🔥97🎉92👏1

4 Mar 2025, 20:38 UTC≈29,300 views767 reactions32 Starsread 1 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥365❤‍🔥227👾125🎉50

4 Mar 2025, 19:59 UTC≈21,100 views127 reactions11 Starsread 1 September 2026
Video

▫️1+2=9999 $APHBT = RESULTS!▪️ 👉 По результатам пятничного конкурса, победитель — @Inlegeartis 🔜Напиши свой Тон кошелек мне ( @theasterrvn ) - чтобы получить свою награду! 🤯🤯🤯 Blum / Gate.io / MEXC 🔙:: ⬜️ ⚫️⚫️⚫️⬜️ ::🔜

❤‍🔥97👏15👾15

4 Mar 2025, 19:53 UTC≈11,300 views140 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👾120❤‍🔥20

3 Mar 2025, 19:43 UTC≈6,940 views289 reactions3 Starsread 1 September 2026
Video

\\: 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯 - 014: 🤖🤖 : 🤯 : 🤖🤖 : 🤯 : 🤖🤖 👉 Decode the { ART }’s text in comments to this post to win 6 666 $APHBT token prize pool. 👉 First Decode = Win 3333 $APHBT 👉 Best Decode - The one who circles in Paint, Photoshop or any other way - each of the letters as correctly as possible. The challenge is to demonstrate each letter individually. Whoever can provide the most accurate version = Win 3333 $APHBT 🤯🤯🤯🤯: Н

❤‍🔥160🔥114👾12🎉3

28 Feb 2025, 20:18 UTC≈4,500 views75 reactions4 Starsread 1 September 2026

____🔜 : ⚫️⚫️⚫️ - 🤯🤯🤯🤯 : 🔙____ ▫️ День "Х" всё ближе, а значит▪️ 🔴 время рассказать о нас!🟢 ⬛️01⬜️🔙————————- Подпишись на наш канал Жми на кнопку "Участвовать!" ———🔜⬛️02⬜️🔙——— Скидывай ссылку двум друзьям ———————---🔜⬛️03⬜️ Получи шанс выиграть ⬛️ 9999 $APHBT ⬜️ Победители розыгрыша: 1. Inlegeartis - 2ivhtk

❤‍🔥43👾27🔥5

Signed GiveShareBot - бот для розыгрышей

28 Feb 2025, 12:52 UTC≈3,690 views324 reactions3 Starsread 1 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥224👾97❤‍🔥3

26 Feb 2025, 12:52 UTC≈3,280 views162 reactions7 Starsread 1 September 2026
Video

🔜🔴25K TRANSACTIONS!🟢🔙 🤯🤯🤯🤯: А тем временем - мы почти перешагнули отметку в 30 тысяч транзакций! 🔜 И мы всё ближе и ближе к тому, чтобы начать 🔴Б0льшYю_NгрY🟢 🔜 Это будет стоить того🤯 🤯🤯🤯 Blum / Gate.io / MEXC 🔙:: ⬜️ ⚫️⚫️⚫️⬜️ ::🔜

❤‍🔥145👏14👾2🎉1

26 Feb 2025, 12:51 UTC≈2,610 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🔥5

25 Feb 2025, 10:50 UTC≈2,820 views365 reactions4 Starsread 1 September 2026

▫️\: М0Ж3ШЬ ПР0ЧИ74ТЬ М3НЯ? ▪️ Э70 П1СЬМ0 СЛУЖ17 ДЛR Т0Г0, ❤️Ч7()Бb| D0К4З47Ь, ❤️ Ч7( ) Н4Ш М0ЗГ М0Ж37 Д3Л47Ь. УД1ВИ7ЕЛЬНЫ3 В3Щ1! 😉 Н3В3Р0Я7НЫ3! С П3РВ0Г0 Р4З4 Э7() БЫЛО 👉 СЛ0ЖН() Н() 7ЄП3РЬ, Н4 Э7()Й С7Р0КЄ 🔙 Тв0Й 🔴Р4ЗУМ🟢 Ч1ТАЄ7 Э7() ❗️❗️ ▫️ 4В70М47ИЧ3С

🔥271👾87👏7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aiphabet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AiPHABET: ART vs Ai” (@aiphabet), 10,455 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiphabet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.