Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алексей | AI PROKA4

Channel

Алексей | AI PROKA4

@aiproka4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

657subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004444267834
TypeChannel
Username@aiproka4
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 26 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aiproka4

Growth

642657649.57 August 2026 — 642 subscribers7 August 2026 — 644 subscribers8 August 2026 — 644 subscribers14 August 2026 — 651 subscribers22 August 2026 — 653 subscribers29 August 2026 — 657 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 22 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 640–659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 14:13657+4
22 Aug 2026, 15:14653+2
14 Aug 2026, 16:58651+7
8 Aug 2026, 02:47644no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:21644+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:48642first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

450 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17639.1%
8719.3%
😁4810.7%
👍388.44%
🙏368.00%
💊265.78%
😢122.67%
71.56%
🍾61.33%
👎30.667%
🕊30.667%
😨20.444%
🤔20.444%
👾10.222%
💯10.222%
🤡10.222%
🤯10.222%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 450 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aiproka4. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC419 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Это не просто пост, я очень очень и очень рекомендую использовать этот скилл!

6😁3👾1

31 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC460 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 Скилл «grill me»: пусть Claude разнесёт вашу идею Самое опасное состояние - когда идея вам нравится. В этот момент вы слепы к её дырам. Скилл «grill me» создан ровно для этого: он не хвалит, он раздалбывает. По умолчанию модель - удобный собеседник: соглашается, поддакивает, находит в вашей идее хорошее. Приятно и бесполезно. «grill me» это переворачивает - Claude превращается в жёсткого скептика, который ищет сл

🔥16👍52💯1

27 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC640 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🫠Записал урок, а он уже устарел Ну ребят. Сижу довольный, только смонтировал наконец урок - установка, CLAUDE.md, как работает. И тут Anthropic выкатывает разбор про контекст для пятого поколения. Открываю - а половину того, что я наговорил, теперь надо делать наоборот. Так что урок иду переписывать. А вам сразу выжимку, почему. Суть вот в чём: команда Claude урезала свой CLAUDE.md до минимума и прогнала тесты. К

🔥283

23 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC720 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔥 Почему ИИ путается в буквах слова Спросите у модели, сколько «r» в слове «strawberry» - и она вполне может ошибиться. Думаю видели такой прикол) Звучит абсурдно: пишет код и эссе, но спотыкается о детский вопрос. Разберём почему - это вскрывает саму механику. Главное: модель не видит букв. Вообще. Прежде чем попасть в модель, текст режется на токены - куски слов. «strawberry» может стать тремя кусками вроде str

16👍4🤯1

20 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC873 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня ОЧЕНЬ постараюсь записать для вас 1-2 урока! А пока, ловите от меня https://notch-agents-production.up.railway.app БЕСПЛАТНО Домен прикручу попозже! Будут баги или пожелания, пишите в комменты!

6🔥5🤔2👍1👎1

17 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC864 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Какое-то проклятие на ролик🫠 С собакой в ветеринарке(

🙏28😢92

16 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC888 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Немного приболел🥲 Ролик завтра!

💊26🙏8🕊3😢3

14 Jul 2026, 12:25 UTC991 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🙌Завтра-послезавтра постараюсь выпустить второй урок!

19👍13🍾6🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC966 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Модель забывает середину! Почему? Странный факт: если спрятать нужный факт в начале или в конце длинного контекста - модель его найдёт. Спрячьте ровно тот же факт в середине - и она его теряет. Это называют lost in the middle. Точность по позиции идёт U-образной кривой (на картинке попробовал изобразить): высокая по краям, проседает в середине на 20-30 пунктов. Почему так? Внимание модели не размазано ровно по

74👍1

7 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC922 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

⚡️Методические материалы к уроку

🔥26

7 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC≈2,830 views62 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

⚡️ Это первый ролик на канале. И первый урок курса по Claude Code. Никаких «подпишись, потом что-нибудь выложу» — контент уже здесь: 9 минут, после которых у вас стоит Claude Code и вы понимаете сессию и контекст - то, без чего агентом пользуются наугад, а потом жалуются, что «ИИ тупит». Внутри: установка с нуля, первый запрос, /clear и /compact без сжигания токенов впустую. 📎 Методичка в PDF прилагается: конспект

🔥592😁1

7 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC781 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁28🔥3😨2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aiproka4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алексей | AI PROKA4” (@aiproka4), 657 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aiproka4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.