Channel
@airdropsfactory
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
128,737subscribers
-4,256 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001461206722 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @airdropsfactory |
| Description | Stay here and soon you will not be a simple hamster of the crypto world Admin: @ryder_reilly |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/airdropsfactory |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:25 | 128,737 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:26 | 128,738 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:44 | 128,750 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:09 | 128,752 | -1,341 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:54 | 130,093 | -132 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 130,225 | -38 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 130,263 | -122 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:28 | 130,385 | -176 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:38 | 130,561 | -222 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 130,783 | -202 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 130,985 | -273 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:05 | 131,258 | -265 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 131,523 | -332 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 131,855 | -206 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:01 | 132,061 | -146 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 132,207 | -51 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 132,258 | -50 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:10 | 132,308 | -39 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:30 | 132,347 | -8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 132,355 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (8 May 2026 – 1 November 2026) |
| Views total | 108,900 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 03:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📌 Pi Network rolls out 4 developer updates ahead of November summit ➡️ Pi Network has released four updates covering app development, token tracking, AI-assisted software packaging, and identity verification ahead of its Nov. 17–19 Ecosystem Summit.Inside the Developer Portal, a dedicated App Configuration section has replaced the previous onboarding checklist. Developers can manage domains, API keys, app wallets, a…
👀 Justin Sun becomes PEPE’s largest individual holder, Arkham says 🌐 Tron founder Justin Sun has accumulated nearly 3% of PEPE’s supply, with blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence identifying approximately $51.25 million worth of the memecoin across his known and suspected wallets. According to an October 27 Arkham Intelligence report, the tokens entered Sun-linked wallets over the previous 10 days, making h…
⚠️ Tether leads $15M funding for Mural to power AI agent payments 👀 Tether has led a $15 million Series A funding round for New York-based Mural, supporting the financial technology company’s development of payment infrastructure for businesses and artificial intelligence agents. Mural plans to use the investment to expand internationally and develop the banking, payment and compliance services needed for software a…
🔖 Australia proposes new crypto exchange rules for 2027 📣 Australia has proposed new rules for cryptocurrency trading and custody platforms on October 15, 2026, with financial regulator ASIC seeking public feedback by November 27 before the country’s digital asset licensing framework takes effect in April 2027. 📊 The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) announced the consultation alongside Consul…
📣 Cardano’s Hoskinson challenges Vitalik over AI threats to crypto ⚠️ Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has challenged Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin over his warning that advances in artificial intelligence could weaken quantum-resistant cryptography, arguing that existing security standards already account for decades of mathematical attacks. Hoskinson responded on October 9 to Buterin’s concerns about lattic…
🌐 Crypto gainers and losers: Quant jumps 158%, Lighter sinks 📊 Bitcoin traded near $84,600 on Oct. 3 as Quant and Midnight led the week’s top crypto gainers, rising 158.3% and 96.5%, respectively. Lighter fell 28.7%, while MemeCore, Ethena and Zcash posted double-digit losses. CoinGecko’s seven-day top-100 rankings for Oct. 3 placed Bitway and Pumpfun behind Quant and Midnight among the leading gainers. Its separate…
📣 Japan arrests two suspect over 81M yen crypto police scam 🔖 Japanese police have arrested two people suspected of helping a fake police fraud group steal cryptocurrency worth approximately 81 million yen from a woman in her 40s. The victim was allegedly told that her bank card had been connected to a large money laundering investigation. According to police information cited by FNN, the group claimed a fraud case …
🔔 South Korea targets November review for second stage crypto legislation 🌐 South Korea’s Financial Services Commission has set November for a National Assembly subcommittee review of the Digital Asset Framework Act, rejecting claims that work on the country’s second stage crypto legislation has been delayed. According to Seo Na yoon, head of the FSC’s virtual asset division, the regulator and lawmakers are moving i…
🌐 Bitcoin price targets $72.5K as Aroon favors sellers 🔖 Bitcoin price fell toward $75,500 after the U.S. Senate rejected the CLARITY Act, while bearish momentum and nearby liquidation clusters raised the risk of another decline before the Federal Reserve’s rate decision. Bitcoin price fell toward $75,500 after the U.S. Senate rejected the CLARITY Act, while bearish momentum and nearby liquidation clusters raised th…
🔔 Zcash price holds above $1,200 as sell signal appears ➡️ Zcash price traded near $1,216 on Sep. 10 after a seven-day rally of more than 50%, but overbought momentum, a three-day sell signal and nearby liquidation clusters raised the risk of a pullback. According to data from cryptonews, Zcash price was trading at $1,216.15 at the time of writing, down 2.26% for the session after opening at $1,244.18. The token tra…
🌐 Coldcard hacker uses THORChain to swap stolen BTC 📣 A hacker associated with the third wave of Coldcard wallet thefts began converting stolen Bitcoin into Ether through THORChain on Sept. 3, according to Galaxy Research’s Alex Thorn. The transactions moved approximately 10% of the Bitcoin controlled by that attacker. Roughly 90% remained at its original addresses when he published the update. 🔖 Researchers traced…
📌 Beyond the rally: 4 Trends to watch this cycle 🔔 Robinhood’s Chain launch highlights four crypto trends reshaping ownership, finance, money and AI-driven markets. When digital asset prices surge, market commentary tends to fixate on green candles and central bank policy. Yet, looking beyond the immediate rally reveals a deeper structural shift taking place on-chain. ⚠️ Robinhood’s CEO, Vlad Tenev, skilfully drew …
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @airdropsfactory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Factory” (@airdropsfactory), 128,737 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/airdropsfactory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.