🔵 В Иркутской области прорабатывают проект межвузовского кампуса ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX

Channel
Телеканал АИСТ | Иркутская область
@aisttvru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
7,858subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001476062453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aisttvru |
| Created | 10 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aisttvru |
Topic
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 7,858 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 7,861 | -8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 7,869 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:48 | 7,881 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 7,882 | +26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 7,856 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 7,861 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 7,862 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 7,869 | +8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 7,861 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 7,878 | +10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 7,868 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 7,861 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 7,860 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 7,860 | first reading |
Engagement
197 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.19%
- avg views ÷ 7,858 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 172
- 50 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.785%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 50
- of 197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 50 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 197 (6 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,613 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4h 03m
- Average length
- 1m 47s
Measured directly from 137 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
96 reactions across 55 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 52.1% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 26.0% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 9.38% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔵 Автограф-сессия, фотографии с кумирами и общение – всё это провели в одном из торговых центров Иркутска в честь старта нового сезона Суперлиги ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
🔥2
🔵 Ежегодный турнир по мини-футболу памяти Льва Перминова стартует 4 сентября ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
🔵 V ежегодный фестиваль водных видов спорта «Алые паруса» состоится в Иркутске 30 августа ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
🔵 VII ежегодный фестиваль «Голос улиц» вновь проходит в Иркутске ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
❤1👍1🔥1
🔵 Итоги региональной программы «Герои Приангарья» подвели в Иркутской области ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
🔵 В Иркутске прошла церемония награждения педагогов ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
🔵 27 тысяч первоклассников впервые переступят пороги школ Иркутской области 1 сентября ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
🔵 Заморозки до -3° обещают синоптики сегодня ночью в северных и верхнеленских районах Иркутской области ▶️ Мы в RUTUBE | ВК | ОК | ДЗЕН | MAX
❗Иркутянин подозревается в передаче сим‑карт для незаконных целей В Иркутске 33‑летний мужчина попал под следствие: его подозревают в том, что он передавал абонентские номера другим людям ради заработка. По данным следствия, в марте этого года мужчина оформил на себя 20 цифровых сим‑карт, а ещё 35 — на своих родителей, при этом они не знали, для чего нужны эти номера. После чего он передал все номера третьим лицам …
❤1
В центре Иркутска 6 сентября перекроют движение из‑за крестного хода Он приурочен к открытию Дней русской духовности и культуры «Сияние России». Движение транспорта ограничат с 7:00 до 13:30 на участках: ◾Нижняя Набережная (от Сухэ‑Батора до Ленина); ◾улица Ленина (от Нижней Набережной до Карла Маркса); ◾улица Карла Маркса (от Ленина до Сухэ‑Батора); ◾улица Сухэ‑Батора (от Карла Маркса до Нижней Набережной). ▶️ Мы…
Свалки на кладбищах в Аларском районе убрали после вмешательства прокуратуры Прокуратура Аларского района выявила свалки на кладбищах в Александровске, Табарсуке, Алари и других территориях. Там скапливались бытовые отходы, а также венки, искусственные цветы и другие ритуальные вещи. После проверки прокуратуры на кладбищах провели уборку, организовали субботники и ликвидировали свалки. Фото: прокуратура Иркутской …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @aisttvru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@aisttvru edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@dlustr · 1772 postsВелоспорт Иркутской области
@velosport38 · 2872 postsОКСАНА ГИЛЁВА ВЕДУЩАЯ МЕРОПРИЯТИЙ
@Ok_sana_gilya88 · 1561 postАльтаир Иркутск
@alta_irkru · 1,4161 postMon amour 💔 olgahohlova.siberia
@amourfan · 441 postИркутский областной музыкальный театр им.Н.М.Загурского
@imt_irkutsk · 2,6661 postКраски и сухие смеси 🔻
@krasland38 · 1931 postСТРАНОВЕД
@stranoved · 115,5521 postСвет38
@svetpriangaria38 · 27,4301 postАЭМ «Тальцы»
@talciirkutsk · 8801 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chp_irkutsk · 24,201
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@vestiirkutsk · 28,034
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 10 September 2026
@irkru · 22,145
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
@city1661 · 22,606
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
@svetpriangaria38 · 27,430
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
@kobzevii · 79,339
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
@incident_138 · 25,977
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 September 2026
@svodka138 · 53,458
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
@svodka38irk · 26,764
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
@irkutsk_smi · 105,299
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
@liveirkytsk · 24,107
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 September 2026
@irk01 · 31,265
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
@irkdtp · 64,250
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
@svodka38 · 114,150
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
@ikt_irk · 26,765
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
@baikalnofilters · 22,077
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 21 September 2026
@PRiangarskie · 42,313
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
@irkutsx · 27,929
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
@babr_mash · 42,310
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
@irk_dvig · 22,352
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…крылом АИСТа миллионы | сайт = https://aisttv.ru | телеграмм канал = https://t.me/aisttvru }} '''ООО «Телекомпания „Аист ТВ“»''' (до 2019 года — Альтернативная…”
read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Телеканал АИСТ | Иркутская область” (@aisttvru), 7,858 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aisttvru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.