Знали про двойное касание стилусом в SketchUp на iPad? 👀 Если вы работаете в скетче на планшете со стилусом, попробуйте дважды быстро коснуться его пальцем. Этот жест позволяет быстро переключаться между инструментами и режимами работы и здорово экономит время, когда вы постоянно что-то выделяете, редактируете и снова переключаетесь на моделирование. На первый взгляд - мелочь, но именно из таких мелочей и складыва…

Channel
SketchUp Enscape
@aivrud
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,535subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001889411185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aivrud |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aivrud |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 5,535 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 5,543 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 5,545 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 5,540 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 5,545 | +7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 5,538 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 5,536 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 5,524 | +12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 5,512 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 5,526 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 5,535 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 5,535 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 58s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
211 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 37.0% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 12.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 9.00% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 6.64% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 5.21% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 3.79% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 3.32% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 2.84% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 2.37% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.948% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.474% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.474% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.474% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔵Почему Blender не заменит SketchUp в дизайне интерьера? Blender действительно мощный инструмент. Но в дизайне интерьера вопрос не в том, какая программа круче, а в том, какая быстрее решает конкретную задачу 🤌🏼 И здесь SketchUp по-прежнему очень сложно заменить. 1. Скорость важнее универсальности Blender — настоящий комбайн: моделирование, анимация, сложная визуализация и ещё огромное количество возможностей. Но н…
😍2
Posted without readable text
❤3❤🔥2👀2🤗2👏1🔥1🆒1
🔵Если вы дизайнер интерьера и всё ещё открываете SketchUp только на компьютере, у меня к вам вопрос 👀 А почему?! Компьютер + iPad — вот связка, которая сегодня делает работу дизайнера быстрее, мобильнее и удобнее. Представьте: 🔹Вы приехали на объект с клиентом. Нужно поменять планировку? Открываете проект на iPad и делаете это прямо на встрече. 🔹Клиент говорит: «А давайте попробуем вот так?» — и вы не объясняете с…
❤3👍2🔥2🙏1
🔵Новый четверг — новая модель в вашу библиотеку 🎁 Сегодня дарим кровать BACCI. Спокойная геометрия делают эту модель выразительной без лишнего декора. Именно тот случай, когда акцент строится на форме и материалах 🤌🏼 Забирайте бесплатно в течение 24 часов [ЗДЕСЬ] 💙 UPD: время истекло
❤13❤🔥1👍1🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤4❤🔥2👏2⚡1👍1💯1😍1
💙 Таким SketchUp вы ещё не видели 😍 🗓 На каком устройстве он раскроет весь потенциал, смотрите на эфире ⤵️ «СКЕТЧАП: НА ПЛАНШЕТЕ ИЛИ НА КОМПЬЮТЕРЕ. ЗА И ПРОТИВ» Разберу: — преимущества планшета; — возможности компьютера; — ограничения каждого подхода; — и новые возможности SketchUp с ИИ. 🎁 Плюс всем участникам подарю электронный учебник «SketchUp + Enscape». Регистрация [ЗДЕСЬ] 💙
👍2🔥2❤1❤🔥1👏1🤝1
Да, SketchUp на айпаде и компьютере творят офигенскую красоту 💙 Как определиться, на каком инструменте работать? Ответ [ЗДЕСЬ], заодно узнаете о преимуществах работы на каждом из этих устройств 🤌🏼
❤3❤🔥3👍1👏1🔥1🥰1
Работа в SketchUp на планшете 💙
🔥3❤2❤🔥1👍1👏1🤩1
💙 Я ему — фотку и пожелания, а он мне — готовую 3D модель за несколько секунд 🤌🏼 Да! ИИ, встроенный в SketchUp, на это способен! Приглашаю вас на новый курс «SketchUp на планшете». Мы добавили в новую программу тренажеры и блок по ИИ-шке ✔️ Самые выгодные условия тем, кто заполнит анкету предзаписи [ЗДЕСЬ]👌🏻
🔥4❤🔥2❤1👍1👏1🤩1
🔵 Щедрый четверг снова радует приятными сюрпризами 🤌🏼 Сегодня дарим диван BACCI Спокойный, стильный, лаконичный 💙 Забирайте бесплатно в течение 24 часов [ЗДЕСЬ] 🫰🏼 UPD: время истекло
❤6🙏2✍1❤🔥1🔥1🤗1🤩1😍1
Когда меня спрашивают о том, что лучше: планшет или компьютер? Я уточняю: какая стоит задача? Универсального ответа на этот вопрос нет. Если нужно быстро показать идею — это один сценарий. Если нужно создать сложную сцену с детальной визуализацией — совсем другой. Если нужно работать с клиентом на встрече — третий. Именно поэтому я не люблю советы в стиле: «Все должны работать только так и никак иначе»))) Все должн…
❤🔥2❤1👍1🤩1🥰1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @aivrud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Друзья, вопрос! Обучение скетчу на MacBook интересно/актуально?
- Да, очень надо39%
- Не актуально61%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mamaenkodesign · 29,541
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
@skdesigntg · 25,457
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 September 2026
@misha_des · 51,675
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
@ad_interior · 29,796
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
@geometrium_school · 43,575
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
@prostoremont · 34,719
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
@yuloo · 77,460
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SketchUp Enscape” (@aivrud), 5,535 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aivrud.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.