Do not underestimate the value of even a simple good deed. [Seeds of Admonishment and Reform, Ibn al-Jawzi (rahimahullah), pg. 211]

Channel
Akhawaat
@akhawaat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,593subscribers
+134 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001055328439 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @akhawaat |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/akhawaat |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:54 | 14,593 | -2 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 14,595 | +9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 14,586 | +23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 14,563 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 14,562 | +17 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 14,545 | +2 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 14,543 | +12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 14,531 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 14,524 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 14,520 | +7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 14,513 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 14,514 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 14,518 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 14,519 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 14,518 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 14,522 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 14,516 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 14,517 | +7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 14,510 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 14,503 | first reading |
Engagement
136 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.43%
- avg views ÷ 14,593 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 646
- 44 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 44
- of 136 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 136 (31 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 28,445 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 28s
- Average length
- 1m 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Sisters: Do you want to learn ways that actually work to increase your wealth by bringing barakah in it? When do you want to begin?
- I am building a business / brand and would love help in this regard18%
- I provide for myself. This sounds like something I’ve been looking for19%
- I am a sole breadwinner for my children and I run a business. I am interested in this1%
- I have a desk job and want barakah in my wealth as nothing seems to last with me9%
- I have huge debts and all doors to rizq seem to closed upon me. I need help16%
- I am too exhausted at work with little pay. I want to know what I can do to improve my situation15%
- I’ve got everything right but there is a sudden decline in wealth and sales, I want to learn why4%
- I am going to start earning soon and I’d be interested15%
- I am looking for jobs but it just does not work out. This sounds beneficial for me.40%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Provision and Spending {قُلْ إِنَّ رَبِّي يَبْسُطُ الرِّزْقَ لِمَن يَشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ وَيَقْدِرُ لَهُ وَمَا أَنفَقْتُم مِّن شَيْءٍ فَهُوَ يُخْلِفُهُ وَهُوَ خَيْرُ الرَّازِقِينَ} Say: "Truly, my Lord enlarges the provision for whom He wills of His slaves, and (also) restricts (it) for him, and whatsoever you spend of anything (in Allah's Cause), He will replace it. And He is the Best of providers." [Surat Sab…
Ibn al-Qayyim (rahimahullah) said: (Giving in to) anxiety (distress, despair, worry) brings no benefit, it causes the loss of reward and makes the calamity feel even greater (doubles it). [Tareeq al-Hijratayn, pg. 218]
Teach them (your children) that which is obligatory to learn from the religion: Anas ibn Malik (radiyAllahu ‘anhuma) related that the Messenger of Allah (sallAllahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: “Seeking knowledge is obligatory upon every Muslim” (Ibn Maajah, no. 224) With caution not to allow the children to travel outside even for studies until he has been strengthened by knowledge of the Shari’ah and marriage to a r…
A man said to Maymoon bin Mahraan (rahimahullah) “O Abu Ayoob, the people will continue to have goodness as long as Allaah keeps you with them.” Maymoon (rahimahullah) scoffed: “Go about your business, the people will continue to have goodness as long as they fear their Lord!” [Seera Aalaam an-Nubalaa’, 5/75]
Ruling on saying “you/they did not deserve this” It is not permissible to say this (i.e., the statement ‘you/they did not deserve this’) because it is like objecting to Allaah, may He be exalted. He knows best about the situation of His slaves, and He is Most Wise in what He decrees for them of health and sickness, richness and poverty, and so on. What is prescribed is to say, “May Allaah grant him good health an…
🛡https://giveagoat.online/ ✅Aqeeqah ✅Udhiyah ✅Sadaqah {and seek healing through charity} ✅Expiation / Kaffarah
Spend for Allah and Receive from Allah {آمِنُوا بِاللَّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ وَأَنفِقُوا مِمَّا جَعَلَكُم مُّسْتَخْلَفِينَ فِيهِ فَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مِنكُمْ وَأَنفَقُوا لَهُمْ أَجْرٌ كَبِيرٌ} Believe in Allah and His Messenger and spend out of that in which He has made you trustees. And such of you as believe and spend (in Allah's Way), theirs will be a great reward (ajrun kabeer). [Surah Hadid, 57:8] {وَمَا لَكُمْ أَلّ…
https://helpthisdeen.com
A raqi writes: "Treat your patients (ailing ones) with charity. We have seen wonders in healing of patients through charity." Ibn Baz (rahimahullah) said: "Charity is among the greatest causes of healing, relieving distress, and warding off affliction." I (Abdul Malik) have seen the impact of this hadith in the long life of my mother (may Allah have mercy on her), her resilience in the face of illnesses that coul…
Read: Some Signs and Symbols Seen in a Dream that Indicate the Presence of Spiritual Afflictions in the Dreamer
Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @akhawaat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Sisters: Do you want to learn ways that actually work to increase your wealth by bringing barakah in it? When do you want to begin?
- I am building a business / brand and would love help in this regard18%
- I provide for myself. This sounds like something I’ve been looking for19%
- I am a sole breadwinner for my children and I run a business. I am interested in this1%
- I have a desk job and want barakah in my wealth as nothing seems to last with me9%
- I have huge debts and all doors to rizq seem to closed upon me. I need help16%
- I am too exhausted at work with little pay. I want to know what I can do to improve my situation15%
- I’ve got everything right but there is a sudden decline in wealth and sales, I want to learn why4%
- I am going to start earning soon and I’d be interested15%
- I am looking for jobs but it just does not work out. This sounds beneficial for me.40%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BeneficialKnowledge · 26,517
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
@IslamicQuotess · 27,367
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 September 2026
@LiteratureLoversTelegram · 28,367
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Akhawaat” (@akhawaat), 14,593 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akhawaat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.