Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ОПРОВЕРЖЕНИЯ | Асиф аль-Ашари

Channel

ОПРОВЕРЖЕНИЯ | Асиф аль-Ашари

@akldasalaf

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

382subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002001424434
TypeChannel
Username@akldasalaf
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/akldasalaf

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

365382373.57 August 2026 — 365 subscribers8 August 2026 — 367 subscribers8 August 2026 — 367 subscribers16 August 2026 — 372 subscribers24 August 2026 — 380 subscribers31 August 2026 — 382 subscribers10 September 2026 — 379 subscribers17 September 2026 — 382 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 362–385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:18382+3
10 Sept 2026, 07:15379-3
31 Aug 2026, 02:16382+2
24 Aug 2026, 16:03380+8
16 Aug 2026, 06:36372+5
8 Aug 2026, 06:30367no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:12367+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:17365first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
56s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8655.1%
😁3220.5%
🔥2113.5%
👍127.69%
👎53.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC52 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сказал имам Абдурахман аль-Макки (رحمه الله): «Ты знай что наидостоверное мнение у поздних ученых шафиитского мазхаба, таких как Ибн Хаджар Хайтами (رحمه الله) гласит, что разрешается переходить из одного мазхаба в другой мазхаб из записанных и укомплектованных мазхабов, даже без необходимости, просто по желанию, и разницы нет переход будет на всегда или периодами, и главное что бы это не привело к тальфику» 📚[Фава

👍4🔥21

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

5 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC90 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

сделаем дуа, ин шаа Аллах

9

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

4 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC111 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

теперь будем калям распространять тут 😂

8👎3😁3🔥1

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

4 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC145 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥105

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

29 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC253 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Разъяснение того, что Пророк ﷺ лучше Корана в смысле читаемого выражения. Возникает вопрос: что лучше — Коран в смысле читаемого словесного выражения или наш господин Мухаммад ﷺ? Некоторые приводили в качестве довода то, что передаётся: «Каждая буква лучше Мухаммада и семейства Мухаммада». Однако достоверность этого не установлена. Истина же состоит в том, что он ﷺ лучше, поскольку он лучше всякого сотворённого, к

2👍1🔥1

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

27 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC214 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Если бы Аллах 1. был бы субстанцией то неизбежно бы описывался либо покоям либо движением оба начальны, всякое что описывается начальным не опережает его, а все что не опережает начальное само начально 2. Все субстанций идентичны, а всякое идентичное в одном статусе А статус субстанции это мумкин, следовательно все что подходит под определение субстанции является мумкином ( рационально допустимым ) а если оно та

6😁1

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

27 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC154 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💬 У тебя новое сообщение! А почему الله не может быть извечной субстанцией ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.

1

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

27 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC164 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Уроки по ханафитскому фикху.

1

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

23 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC138 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Скачать книгу.

10

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

23 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC153 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📖 «МИНХАДЖ АТ-ТАЛИБИН» ИМАМА АН-НАВАВИ — ВПЕРВЫЕ НА РУССКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ Хвала Аллаху, Господу миров, мир и благословение Посланнику Аллаха, его семье и сподвижникам. Есть книги, о выходе которых сообщают. И есть книги, перед которыми встают. Семь с половиной веков «Минхадж ат-талибин ва ‘умдат аль-муфтин» имама Мухйиддина ан-Навави (да помилует его Аллах) заучивали, переписывали и преподавали — от Каира до Хадрамаута, о

10

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

17 Jul 2026, 19:16 UTC138 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AHMDGSTNFile

Лучи познания и тайны познавших Автор: Имам Изз ад-Дин Абдул-Азиз ад-Дирини (612–697 г.х.) Перевод: Ахмад ад-Дагистани аль-Аш'ари. Эта книга поможет читателю лучше понять основы исламского вероубеждения, познакомиться с вопросами познания Всевышнего Аллаха и духовного очищения. Автор простым и последовательным языком объясняет важные вопросы акыды, опираясь на Коран, Сунну и труды ученых Ахлю-с-Сунна.

👍54

Signed Асиф аль-Ашари

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @akldasalaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОПРОВЕРЖЕНИЯ | Асиф аль-Ашари” (@akldasalaf), 382 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akldasalaf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.