Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 37 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,953–1,966 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 19:40
1,954
-3
10 Sept 2026, 12:17
1,957
-1
1 Sept 2026, 07:14
1,958
-3
26 Aug 2026, 04:06
1,961
-1
23 Aug 2026, 03:08
1,962
+1
19 Aug 2026, 18:25
1,961
-1
13 Aug 2026, 17:58
1,962
-1
10 Aug 2026, 06:50
1,963
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:31
1,964
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:22
1,964
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
825 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
251
30.4%
🔥
154
18.7%
😁
115
13.9%
❤
89
10.8%
🤣
83
10.1%
🥰
52
6.30%
🤮
19
2.30%
💯
12
1.45%
🤨
11
1.33%
🤔
10
1.21%
💩
7
0.848%
🎉
6
0.727%
🤩
5
0.606%
🕊
4
0.485%
🙊
3
0.364%
🌭
2
0.242%
👎
2
0.242%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 825 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2022 to 31 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну как-то глобально к завтрашнему вступлению в силу закона не было ни времени, ни желания готовить особо свои аккаунты, поэтому все делаю в последний момент 😁
Пишу сюда этот мини-пост, чтобы перешедшая аудитория видела, что тут будет актив)
Из полезного «своего», о чем я нигде не писала, есть проекты/каналы в тг:
1. https://t.me/laizafox7_pr
Тут собраны аккаунты, в которых через меня можно приобрести рекламные разм…
СБОЙ ИНСТАГРАМ*
Сейчас не обновляется лента, невозможно посмотреть сторис, не заходит в директ. Аккаунт выглядит так, как будто он заблокирован или взломан.
*признан экстремистским, деятельность запрещена на тер. России
Казахстан
Может быть кто-нибудь знает, развит ли телеграм в Казахстане?
Пользуются ли мессенджером?
А то нашла информацию, что его хотели заблокировать
Благодарна обратной связи🐈
❗СБОЙ В ЗАПРЕЩЁННОЙ СОЦ.СЕТИ❗
Последний час глючит выкладка сторис. Они либо подвисают, либо долго не прогружаются.
Владельцы аккаунтов не видят свои же сторис, не видят охват и список просмотревших.
У пользователей сторис отображаются "выложено 1с назад", либо черным экраном.
Удаленный контент в телеграм
Блогеры все активнее развивают свои каналы и бывает, что используют различные фишки вовлечения.
Одна из них: выложить интересный вовлекающий пост, например, с раскрытием какой-либо интриги. Через время его удалить и оставить последний пост: "удалил, кто успел, тот теперь знает правду".
Людей сразу в канал заходит больше, охваты повышаются, % включенных уведомлений в канале растет. То ест…
🗣Первый раз публикую свою вакансию в канале🗣
Помощник менеджера блогера ко мне в команду @laizafox7
Долгосрочное сотрудничество, возможность роста
Описание вакансии.
Требуется помощник на обязанности:
🔹Ведение текущих реклам, взаимодействие с заказчиком и блогером
🔹Решение проблемных/конфликтных ситуаций в режиме онлайн
🔹Ведение графика в Трелло (примитивный функционал)
🔹Создание напоминаний по текущим задачам
🔹 …
Причем я уже делилась с некоторыми людьми, что меня это бесит
И знаете, что я от них услышала???
"Разберись, что это для тебя?!!!!!
Значит ты себе так не разрешаешь! Воспитание? Нет! Это твои комплексы! Проработай их и ты сможешь тоже писать подписчикам маты"
🙄🙄🙄
И конечно я не говорю про всех, и в целом к мату нейтрально отношусь, но именно это слово и в таких количествах ну как бы поднадолело...)
РАЗЪЕБ
Это кстати мой первый раз, когда я ругаюсь на своей площадке матом)
Сегодня утром я смотрела сторис 7-10 блогеров и у каждого это слово чередуется с "а##еть", "п#здато" и тд
Потом я весь день работала: изучала подачи, которые моим блогерам присылают на рекламу. У ТРОИХ было слово "разъ#б" в разговорных сторис или в макете.
Ну серьезно?
Вы больше никак не можете эмоционально описать свой крутой контент/продук…
👍60❤9💯8👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @akulaiza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Реклама была выложена 3.10 (3 октября) в 19.15 на закрытом аккаунте. В какой день/время сгорит охват в архиве?
4.10 в 19.1524%
5.10 в 19.1539%
6.10 в 19.154%
Ни в какое, останется в архиве34%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2022 to 31 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Laizafox7” (@akulaiza), 1,954 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akulaiza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.