11 measurements spanning 41 days, net -3,042. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 12:17
7
+1
8 Sept 2026, 15:57
6
-2,975
3 Sept 2026, 07:45
2,981
-23
31 Aug 2026, 02:38
3,004
-5
28 Aug 2026, 03:12
3,009
-10
24 Aug 2026, 17:04
3,019
-14
20 Aug 2026, 17:28
3,033
-6
14 Aug 2026, 07:19
3,039
-4
11 Aug 2026, 02:01
3,043
-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:37
3,049
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
3,049
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
14m 18s
Average length
3m 35s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
250 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🫡
106
42.4%
💯
53
21.2%
🔥
35
14.0%
👍
28
11.2%
custom 5202202712631944524
25
10.0%
custom 5987897955015725355
3
1.20%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📍 "سلاح التزييف البصري".. كيف تُخدع الحقيقة في زمن الحرب؟
❌ رصدت منصة "خليك واعي" تصاعد استخدام الصور والفيديوهات المضللة خلال الأزمات، بهدف إرباك الجمهور، وبث الذعر، وصناعة مشاهد غير حقيقية تُقدَّم على أنها واقع ميداني.
👈 بالتحليل، تبيّن أن جزءًا كبيرًا من هذه المقاطع هو إعادة تدوير لمشاهد قديمة من حروب سابقة، أو استخدام لقطات من ألعاب إلكترونية ومحتوى مُولّد بالذكاء الاصطناعي، إلى جانب عناوين صادمة ومصادر مجهولة …
#إيران
🔺 عضو لجنة الأمن القومي في البرلمان الإيراني ابراهيم رضائي:
- ينبغي للسعوديين أن يدركوا أن اتفاقية ورقية مع تركيا وباكستان لن تجلب لهم الأمن، تماماً كما أن سنوات من الاستغلال الأحادي الجانب للأمريكيين لم تجلب لهم الأمن.
- أصلحوا سياساتكم حتى لا تضطروا إلى التوسل للحصول على الحماية من الآخرين.
#باكستان
🔺 الخارجية الباكستانية:
تركيا والسعودية وباكستان توقع اتفاقية دفاع مشترك.
✍️ طيب بدكمش توقعوا وحدة زيها مع غزة، وقعوا على الأقل مع المسجد الأقصى لحاله حتى بدون القدس.. أخزاكم الله يا خدم أمريكا 🤲
#إيران
🔺 المستشار العسكري لقائد الثورة الإسلامية اللواء محسن رضائي:
- لن نسمح بفتح ممر مائي ثانٍ في مضيق هرمز.
- استمرار الحصار سيضع السفن والقوات الأمريكية في مواجهة مخاطر جسيمة وخسائر فادحة.
- على الولايات المتحدة تغيير سلوكها وإلا لن نتحمل هذا الوضع.
🔻 معركة الوجود.. لا أنصاف حلول مع عدونا!
▪️ واهم من يعلّق آماله على سراب الاتفاقات، ومسكين من يظنُّ أنَّ الميدان يقبل القسمة على اثنين؛ فالحقيقة التي لا مفرَّ منها هي "إمَّا نحنُ أو هُم"؛ إنَّ عدوَّنا اليوم، ولأول مرة منذ النكبة، لا يبحث عن تفاهمات أو تسويات، بل يطلب رقابنا ويسعى لاجتثاث وجودنا، واضعاً إيانا أمام خيارين إما الرحيل الكامل عن هذه الأرض، أو المسح عن وجهها بالدم.
▪️ لا تحلموا بحلول جزئية أو مسكناتٍ مؤق…
أَقمَارُ الطُّوْفَانْ
الشهيد القائد الميداني/ محمد فايز البرعي
▫️قائد التعبئة والتوجيه - لواء غزة
تابعوا مرئيات شهداء القسام خلال معركة طوفان الأقصى عبر قناة أقمار الطوفان
الخبر:
بيان قطري أردني إماراتي إندونيسي باكستاني تركي سعودي مصري: على مجلس الأمن إلزام "إسرائيل" بالتزاماتها.
✍ هل تعلمون كم عدد سكان تلك الدول مجتمعة؟
عددهم تقريبا 817.5 مليون نسمة.
وسكان الكيان اللقيط 7.2 مليون نسمة.
هذا يكفي ولا أحتاج لتعليق.
أَقمَارُ الطُّوْفَانْ
تابعوا مرئيات شهداء القسام خلال معركة طوفان الأقصى عبر قناة أقمار الطوفان
🫡15
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @al_falstini. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@al_falstini named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@aqmartofan named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 11 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بدون اسم” (@al_falstini), 7 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/al_falstini.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
