Channel
@alachevamasha
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
239subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001569444588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alachevamasha |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alachevamasha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 239 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 241 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 242 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 245 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 245 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 42.1% | |
| custom 5404805279286051803 | 4 | 21.1% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 5.26% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
айс лате для барби 🎀 увидела тут в магните розовый раф и захотелось попробовать 🤌🏼 скажу так, сладковат, вкусный, в холодном виде понравился больше 💕 ❤️- пробуем? пы.сы.: готовлю для вас полезные посты по трендам лето’26
❤🔥4
посты карусель от которых не укачивает 😎 сначала я скептически отнесла к этому приложению, но разобравшись поняла, что на бесплатной версии очень много крутых фишек и так, считаем: • есть наши любимые шрифты montserrat, soyuз гротеск ( выделила на фото ) • читабельные каллиграфические шрифты • огромное количество стикеров: пленка, отпускная коллекция, летняя, буквы, бумага 📑 КОРОЧЕ, НА ЛЮБОЙ ВКУС И ЦВЕТ • посты уж…
custom 54048052792860518034
история о том, как на меня наслали понос😂 ой, вернее больше 1500 ботов 🤖 пока я отсутствовала здесь, я всей душой полюбила Вк и развиваю там экспертное сообщество и личную страницу и вот пару дней назад, я как всегда оставила комментарий (см.фото 4) под постом, дословно его не помню, потому что удалила потом, но примерно было так: «хорошо что есть авторы, которые тоже любят ВК, как и я и не ноют, что он плохой» и…
❤🔥1🤯1😁1
Представляю, сколько тут всего накопилось)) Ты где-то в другом месте вела блог в это время или наслаждалась безбложной жизнью?🤩
у меня для вас стооооолько интересного для создания контента 📲💪🏼 с чего начнём? ❤️ - пост ностальгия, если вы в отпуске ⚡️ - пост с крутым приложением для оформления постов 🍓 - как создать фото «русска глубинка» в городе
⚡3❤🔥3🍓2
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @alachevamasha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“остывший кофе | жизнь vs контент” (@alachevamasha), 239 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alachevamasha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.