Channel
@alakuma69
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
151subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001798743748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alakuma69 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alakuma69 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 151 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 149 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 152 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 153 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 154 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 154 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
214 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5274261633814773909 | 84 | 39.3% | |
| custom 5341579817340907526 | 47 | 22.0% | |
| custom 5427111015844177802 | 34 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5260567169246192983 | 18 | 8.41% | |
| custom 5429501375597796254 | 18 | 8.41% | |
| custom 5341415904209036259 | 13 | 6.07% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мне особо пока нечего выкладывать, потому что я работаю над комиксом, поэтому вооот
custom 527426163381477390913custom 53415798173409075263custom 53414159042090362591custom 54271110158441778021
будьте бдительны и никому не верьте всё проверяйте
custom 52742616338147739096custom 52605671692461929833custom 53415798173409075261
😅 Боты среди нас | Под именами художников заводят фейковых ботов В последнее время в Telegram участились случаи, когда под именами художников создают ботов, мимикрирующих под их каналы. Они легко вылезают в поиске, при вводе названий каналов. В них предлагают купить якобы подписку за звезды. Схема, скорее всего, такая: Человек ищет канал художника в поиске, по ошибке натыкается на бота, думает, что это платная подп…
custom 53415798173409075264custom 52742616338147739092custom 53414159042090362591
если кого-то случайно живого забанила — извените меня уже вымораживают эти рандомные чуваки с тачками на аве и заходившими последний раз в апреле
custom 52742616338147739096custom 52605671692461929834custom 53414159042090362591
блять я заебалась банить ботов перевожу канал пока в частный
custom 52742616338147739098custom 52605671692461929834custom 53414159042090362591
осознал, что щас получит по жопе
custom 534157981734090752610custom 54271110158441778025custom 52742616338147739093
сегодня мой первый рабочий день после отпуска и я в ахуе давайте посмотрим как мы ели с товарищем на день варенья
custom 527426163381477390916custom 54295013755977962545custom 54271110158441778022
уснула рано и спала сладко сладко... 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 #sonic@alakuma69 #Toki@alakuma69 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸
custom 534157981734090752612custom 52742616338147739097custom 52605671692461929835
а ещё сегодня великий праздник — я не забыла про день рождения первенцев албилов 😳 поздравляем поллукса и кастора с днём рождения. так сказать, нешарящие: угадайте, где здесь поллукс, а где кастор хддд
custom 542950137559779625413custom 54271110158441778027custom 52742616338147739096
сегодня в программе иллюстрация для статьи, которую я немного переделала в некоторых местах, но смысл остался тот же хд 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 #sonic@alakuma69 #Toki@alakuma69 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸
custom 534157981734090752611custom 53414159042090362599custom 52742616338147739094
пыталась попасть в стиль покраса художника, за которым слежу, но потом меня занесло 🥴🌟 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸 #sonic@alakuma69 🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸
custom 542711101584417780216custom 53415798173409075266custom 52742616338147739095
капец сколько дней варенья!!!
custom 52742616338147739098custom 54271110158441778023custom 52605671692461929832
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @alakuma69. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“😈☕ чай с дьяволом 🍔🔥” (@alakuma69), 151 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alakuma69.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.