Photo, posted without a caption
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات

Channel
@alarfat
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
521subscribers
+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001045427748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alarfat |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alarfat |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 521 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 525 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 522 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 519 | +23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 496 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 496 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 490 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 53.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 38.5% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
📚الحروف المقطعة في جلسة علمية في بيت أحد الأفاضل حيث يكثر الداخل والخارج وتقطع الحديث بالقيام والقعود وتداخل الحديث ،طرح كلام حول الحروف المقطعة في فواتح السور ، فكيف نعرف أنها كانت هكذا مكتوبة متصلة وكيف نعلم أن قراءتها كما نقرؤها اليوم مثل طسم ( طا سين ميم ) ؟ وقد تقطع المجلس دون إجابة وافية فنقول: ١)-أما أننا نقطع أنها تقرء سابقا في القرون الأولى كما نقرؤها الآن ( طا سين ميم ) فلأن القرآن تواتر شفهيًا بموازاة الكت…
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
كتاب المباحث الفلسفية والكلامية في كتاب المباحث الأصولية للشيخ الفياض (قدس سر).
❤2
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
File, posted without a caption
❤3
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
https://youtu.be/m8AEXuK6TLM?feature=shared
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
https://youtu.be/jp-ztRUAjX8?feature=shared
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
https://youtu.be/Q8j6emqMNxM?si=Vscb7mv_-KswSJRj
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
📚مباحث الأصول والفلسفة التحليلية وري الثرى الأصولي الكبير أستاذ النجف الأشرف الأشهر في الزمن القريب آية الله المرجع الديني الشيخ محمد إسحاق الفياض (قدس سره). يوم جثى على ركبتيه شيخٌ مسنٌّ لفّ قماشًا على عمامته وأخفى أغلب معالم وجهه وأثنى على الشيخ الراحل الفياض لم تبق من عبارات مدحه في ذاكرتي إلا التي كانت حول الأصول؛ ولعله لأنه استرسل في ذكر الأصول أكثر من غيره من العلوم، أو لعل كلامه وافق هوىً عندي. وتعد موسوعته ال…
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
ذهب السيد مصطفى جمال الدين في مقدمة كتابه البحث النحوي عند الأصوليين - وهو هنا يستعرض آراء مدرسة النجف الحديثة - بالقول عن أصول الإمامية: " أن منهجهم كان أكثر صلة بالمنطق والفلسفة من غيرهم، وستجد ذلك واضحا في بحث (بساطة المشتق وتركيبه) وفي (المعنى الحرفي) وفي (إيجاد المعنى الإنشائي) وأمثال ذلك، وإذا كانت كتب الأصول قائمة على الاستدلال بالأقيسة المنطقية، وتختلط بحوثها، حتى اللغوية منها، ببحوث الفلسفة، فلك أن تقدر قيمة…
❤1😢1
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
https://youtu.be/wYZb3W_MmJg?si=gjXG75UkKD-odLQI
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
4 - ومن أهمّ المشاكل التي درستها الفلسفة القديمة وتناولتها البحوث الجديدة في التحليل الفلسفي للّغة هي مشكلة الكلمات التي لا يبدو أنّها تعبِّر عن شيءٍ موجود ، فماذا نقصد بقولنا مثلًا : « الملازمة بين النار والحرارة » ؟ وهل هذه الملازمة موجودة إلى جانب وجود النار والحرارةٍ ، أو معدومة ؟ وإذا كانت موجودة فأين هي موجودة ؟ وإذا كانت معدومةً ولا وجود لها فكيف نتحدّث عنها ؟ وقد درس الفكر الأصولي هذه المشكلة متحرّراً عن القي…
Signed أبو محمد🌸 العرفات
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alarfat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دارة الثقلين للدراسات التخصصية في الكتاب والعترة” (@alarfat), 521 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alarfat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.