Channel
@albalive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
957subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001325655398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @albalive |
| Created | 12 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/albalive |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 957 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 956 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 951 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 954 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 957 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 957 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
86 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 62 | 72.1% | |
| custom 5249032188464221073 | 10 | 11.6% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 6.98% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 3.49% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 3.49% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.33% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У Майкла Черно свой взгляд на искусство: сначала он пишет академические картины, а затем наносит поверх них тэги и граффити. Получается очень стилево и как-то даже атмосферно. Почитайте о нем в официальных источниках, действительно интересная концепция и философия🩷
❤4
Моя супруга снова затянула нас в очередной интегративный прикол — чистку по методу Ильи Юрьевича Магеря. Сначала были магния сульфат и 36 часов голодания, а теперь — питание с массой ограничений, но не лишенное разнообразия. Никакого мяса, никаких протеиновых батончиков и прочих мимолетных радостей жизни… Так что ждите новые ПП, ЗОЖ и wellness-рецепты👍
custom 524903218846422107310❤5
Дамы, переходите уже на достойный фэшн👜
💘1
Дорогие, у нас тотальная несостыковка между тем, что мы делаем и количеством подписчиков на аккаунте Мастреов в запрещенной соцсети... Подписывайтесь тут💌
💯4
Какой-то бесконечный поток новых видео с ужина от Мастеров в честь Дня рождения Элины💖 МАСТЕРÁ 26 / 07
❤4💘2
Немного бэкстейджа со съемочной площадки🔥
❤9⚡2
Ольга Ильинична — невероятной харизмы бабушка моей супруги, стала участницей шоу Четыре дачи на Пятнице. Само собой, приготовление ужина она доверила мне. Знали бы вы, как мы фигачили этот ужин в условиях жесточайшего цейтнота… И как в итоге забыли подать к столу тирамису с клубникой😭
❤13
А как насчет размера нового Крок месье в Централе? Это примерно завтрак, обед и ужин всего за 600₽🌚
❤5
Сегодня в рубрике Мандэй Брэкфаст Клаб — фирменный завтрак в сочинском Central Bistro на Wellness-завтраке моей любимой супруги. Чистый кайф и никаких двойных стандартов, когда на столах такой мощный набор, а главная тема сегодняшней дискуссии — стройность. Искренне верю, что стройность начинается с качества продуктов и внутренней дисциплины. Важно следить за своим ментальным состоянием, соблюдать режим питания, не…
❤4💯2
Сегодня уже так с супругой, кастрюлю не делайте🙂
❤6🤣3
Еще немного деталей со вчерашнего ужина в Северском Рыбхозе. Это был настоящий интенсив: на полноценный гала-ужин на 40 гостей у нас было всего два часа. Но командой мы успели всё — и сервировку каждого блюда при гостях, и рассказы о продуктах и техниках приготовления, и, само собой, съемку бэкстейджа. Определенно один из самых атмосферных и красивых опытов на моей памяти. А еще невероятно теплая и восторженная обр…
❤12
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @albalive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АЛЬБА” (@albalive), 957 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/albalive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.