Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alex | AI Director

Channel

Alex | AI Director

@alex_ai_director

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

332subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003817117368
TypeChannel
Username@alex_ai_director
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 16 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alex_ai_director

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

255332293.57 August 2026 — 255 subscribers7 August 2026 — 256 subscribers8 August 2026 — 256 subscribers21 August 2026 — 278 subscribers28 August 2026 — 320 subscribers5 September 2026 — 332 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243–344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 12:37332+12
28 Aug 2026, 16:44320+42
21 Aug 2026, 04:33278+22
8 Aug 2026, 09:17256no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:03256+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:02255first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

267 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12546.8%
❤6223.2%
👍5119.1%
🤝114.12%
👏72.62%
🥰51.87%
❤‍🔥41.50%
🤓20.749%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC101 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нещодавно було питання в коментах: які AI я використовую. Коротко: точково підбираю тулзу під запит. Спершу контекст. На ринку є основні провайдери: Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta, X. Майже всі тулзи зазвичай підв'язані під когось із них. Чому так? Бо це ярди інвестицій, які малі компанії не вивезуть. Тому все будується на цих гравцях. Тепер як я вибираю. 1️⃣ розумію, що саме мені треба вирішити. Задача аналітична чи тв…

🔥9❤4👏3

5 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC143 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ребятки, хотів написати пост, але чесно, після відпустки влітаю поки лише в робочі чати і взагалі не встигаю. Так що сорян, напишу пізніше.

🤝11❤4🤓2

2 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC237 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

І фінальна частина: Технічний залив. Що тут? Треба розуміти методи й підходи до заливу. Їх два: через API (умовно, заливати РК через API Мети) або через емуляцію (як це робить фбтул). Різні підходи мають свої плюси, мінуси й підводні камені. Тому що краще саме вам, вирішуєте ви. Ті самі правила діють на всіх інших сорсах: Google, FB, TikTok, нативка. Готово: автозалив. А тепер фінально: об'єднати всі ці системи…

❤11🔥6👍4

30 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC296 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отже, як зробити систему, що вчиться сама. Тут ти будуєш окремий механізм, який працює поверх правил: через певні проміжки часу він сам переглядає свіжі дані, помічає нові закономірності й пропонує тобі нове правило. Умовно приходить і каже: «я помітив, що на цьому гео ліди йдуть тільки після обіду, додати це в аналіз?». Ти дивишся, апруваєш або відхиляєш. І щоразу, коли апруваєш, система стає трохи ближчою до тог…

🔥9❤5👍4

29 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC318 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тепер переходимо до контексту. Тут вже мало лише зібраних даних, тому що це просто цифри. AI не знає, що з ними робити й на що дивитися. 📍Твоя задача: пояснити йому, як саме ти читаєш ці цифри. Умовно, передати свій спосіб мислення. Це і є контекст: набір правил і логіки, за якими ти сам приймаєш рішення, коли дивишся на залив. Що для тебе «добре», що «тривожно», а що «стоп, гасимо». Почнемо з простого рівня — пр…

🔥11❤3👍3

29 Jul 2026, 12:08 UTC576 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Так, ну що, починаємо нашу серію дописів про оптимізацію трафіку за допомогою AI👀. Бачу по опитуваннях, що ви вже не супер новачки, але цікаво довести це до системи, щоб реально працювало. Почнемо з основи: що таке трафік, які в ньому є змінні і що саме ми хочемо оптимізувати. З основного: – зв'язка (тематика заливу, гео) – технічний процес заливу – аналіз Розберемо кожну частину окремо, почнемо з аналізу. 📍Ан…

🔥13❤5👍4

28 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC413 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥13❤4👍4

28 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC406 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мої топ 5 помилок Вирішив записати вам такий подкаст, за 8 років їх було більше ніж ефективних рішень, але це нормально, головне їх не повторювати (що теж важко дається👀). Слухайте про те, як один з проєктів дав в штангу, еґо та як можна легко загратись з людьми й пишіть, що відгукнулось найбільше. Цікаво послухати ваш досвід👇

❤5👍5🔥4

24 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC319 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нарешті поїхав у відпустку. Останні кілька місяців були просто жесть, тому набираюсь сил, щоб далі вам броадкастить про AI. Бачу, що по минулому опитуванню найбільше цікавить оптимізація трафіку (вау, як неочікувано 😄). Тому готую серію постів на цю тему, можливо, присвятимо цьому і весь наступний тиждень, бо інфи немало. Єдине, що є ще кілька питань по вашому рівню користування в цілому, аби ви могли це потім заюз…

🔥10👍6❤4

22 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC298 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Місяць конф позаду — що толкового взяв? Кожна конфа — Грузія, Будапешт, Барса — мала свою специфіку. 👀 З цікавого: Барса стала першою, де більшість працює з е-комом, лідгеном і нішами, які загалом не такі поширені. Умовно — перепродають ліди інвесторам на купівлю будинків у US. І таких варіантів там багато. З точки зору AI найцікавіше ось що. Хлопці будують системи з агентами, які об'єднують різні етапи заливу — …

👍13🔥6❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @alex_ai_director. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Цікаво про оптимізацію:

  1. Трафік45%
  2. Контент (крео / VSL)38%
  3. BDM / робота з рекламою7%
  4. HR / рекрут10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alex | AI Director” (@alex_ai_director), 332 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alex_ai_director.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.