Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пойда | Футбол и все такое

Channel

Пойда | Футбол и все такое

@alexander_poyda

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,045subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001742283248
TypeChannel
Username@alexander_poyda
DescriptionЛюблю халву, помидоры и мандарины Веду и комментирую на @match_tv и @matchpremier RUN & GUN По всем вопросам - @alexanderpoyda
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/alexander_poyda

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,9168,0457,980.56 August 2026 — 7,988 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,985 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,957 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,917 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,933 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,920 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,916 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,918 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,931 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,924 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,921 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,952 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,027 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,007 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,023 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,037 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,028 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,025 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,009 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,045 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
20 measurements spanning 91 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,897–8,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 16:078,045+36
2 Nov 2026, 05:288,009-16
29 Oct 2026, 21:188,025-3
26 Oct 2026, 15:568,028-9
23 Oct 2026, 18:318,037+14
21 Oct 2026, 01:408,023+16
18 Oct 2026, 07:048,007-20
11 Oct 2026, 07:598,027+75
5 Oct 2026, 07:377,952+31
27 Sept 2026, 08:017,921-3
15 Sept 2026, 08:007,924-7
6 Sept 2026, 19:407,931+13
30 Aug 2026, 03:477,918+2
27 Aug 2026, 09:427,916-4
24 Aug 2026, 12:167,920-13
17 Aug 2026, 11:437,933+16
14 Aug 2026, 01:167,917-40
10 Aug 2026, 09:307,957-28
7 Aug 2026, 00:047,985-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:047,988first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.7%
avg views ÷ 8,045 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,910
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held102 (16 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total51,468
Reactions total964
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 11:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,210
Videos
≈683
Links
≈410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 39s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,658 reactions across 102 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,14731.4%
🤣96026.2%
🔥77221.1%
❤46212.6%
😱832.27%
👍621.69%
💯391.07%
🤡300.82%
👏280.765%
🤯160.437%
😢120.328%
😭120.328%
💩80.219%
⚡60.164%
❤‍🔥40.109%
🙏40.109%
🤔30.082%
👎20.055%
💊20.055%
🤬20.055%
4 further kinds40.109%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,658 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 102 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alexander_poyda. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 102 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (25.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC682 views33 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

То ли дело в Динамо

🤣16🔥11❤2💯2😁2

5 Nov 2026, 10:31 UTC826 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Жорже Жезуш > Криштиану Роналду

😁17🤣5❤3💩2🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,020 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вот с этим что делать будем?

😁19🤣7❤2🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 22:49 UTC≈1,280 views47 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Сейчас бы ругаться с челиком, который забил 2, вырвал победу и спас тебя от увольнения.

❤31😁10👍4🔥2

3 Nov 2026, 22:23 UTC≈1,180 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Кунья эпично отпраздновал камбэк

❤16🔥4

3 Nov 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,260 views28 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Кэррик точно сошел с ума

😁20🔥4❤3🤣1

3 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,250 views53 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Пост про дубль Батракова Просто гулял с собакой и не успел со всеми.

🔥29😁15🤣8❤1

3 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC≈1,930 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Они бы ещё спросили, видели ли мы, как Евсеев огрызнулся журналисту. Конечно, видели.

😁14🔥3🤣2❤1

3 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,140 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @derunetsPhoto

Влад шаг за шагом возвращает себе детство. ❤️ Ему всего 7 лет, а за плечами уже борьба с лейкозом и тяжёлое осложнение лечения — метотрексатовая энцефалопатия. Она лишила Влада многих привычных навыков, возможности свободно двигаться и заниматься спортом. Сегодня у Влада есть большие успехи: он снова бегает, прыгает и делает кувырок! За каждым вернувшимся движением — его старания и упорная работа на реабилитации. Д…

❤11🙏3🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,380 views52 reactionsread 6 November 2026

6666 зрителей на матче Оренбург - ЦСКА Это знак!

🤣43🔥4😁4❤1

31 Oct 2026, 21:46 UTC≈1,570 views36 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

МЮ стоит подумать над возвращением Аморима

🔥22😁9❤4🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @alexander_poyda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@alexander_poyda edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTCAnonymous Poll335 voters

Кто выиграет АПЛ?

  1. Арсенал48%
  2. Манчестер Сити10%
  3. Манчестер Юнайтед11%
  4. Астон Вилла2%
  5. Ливерпуль9%
  6. Челси9%
  7. Тоттенхэм 🤣11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пойда | Футбол и все такое” (@alexander_poyda), 8,045 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexander_poyda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.