Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СИТУАЦИЯ СЮР

Channel

СИТУАЦИЯ СЮР

@alexasuka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

413,203subscribers

-14,053 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001633948922
TypeChannel
Username@alexasuka
DescriptionПо рекламе сюда @kotskaya_agency доп: @prkulikolesya РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6797528cb0db9a5cd34068cf
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alexasuka

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

413,203427,256420,229.57 August 2026 — 427,256 subscribers7 August 2026 — 427,043 subscribers8 August 2026 — 426,358 subscribers9 August 2026 — 425,634 subscribers10 August 2026 — 424,513 subscribers11 August 2026 — 423,834 subscribers12 August 2026 — 423,002 subscribers13 August 2026 — 422,084 subscribers15 August 2026 — 423,046 subscribers16 August 2026 — 422,622 subscribers17 August 2026 — 422,135 subscribers18 August 2026 — 421,713 subscribers19 August 2026 — 421,156 subscribers20 August 2026 — 420,471 subscribers21 August 2026 — 419,796 subscribers23 August 2026 — 419,148 subscribers24 August 2026 — 418,749 subscribers25 August 2026 — 419,228 subscribers26 August 2026 — 419,158 subscribers27 August 2026 — 418,617 subscribers28 August 2026 — 418,321 subscribers29 August 2026 — 418,465 subscribers30 August 2026 — 418,058 subscribers31 August 2026 — 417,431 subscribers1 September 2026 — 416,893 subscribers2 September 2026 — 416,345 subscribers4 September 2026 — 415,872 subscribers6 September 2026 — 415,070 subscribers9 September 2026 — 414,931 subscribers11 September 2026 — 415,748 subscribers13 September 2026 — 414,970 subscribers15 September 2026 — 414,055 subscribers17 September 2026 — 413,203 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -14,053. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 411,095–429,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 08:17413,203-852
15 Sept 2026, 09:01414,055-915
13 Sept 2026, 19:41414,970-778
11 Sept 2026, 23:38415,748+817
9 Sept 2026, 17:18414,931-139
6 Sept 2026, 11:20415,070-802
4 Sept 2026, 03:19415,872-473
2 Sept 2026, 17:38416,345-548
1 Sept 2026, 19:14416,893-538
31 Aug 2026, 20:25417,431-627
30 Aug 2026, 17:08418,058-407
29 Aug 2026, 13:43418,465+144
28 Aug 2026, 12:22418,321-296
27 Aug 2026, 14:55418,617-541
26 Aug 2026, 12:33419,158-70
25 Aug 2026, 15:25419,228+479
24 Aug 2026, 17:58418,749-399
23 Aug 2026, 05:49419,148-648
21 Aug 2026, 19:55419,796-675
20 Aug 2026, 16:44420,471first reading

Engagement

280 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 101 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 413,203 subscribers
Avg views / post
79,700
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
154
of 280 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held280 (31 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total12,271,960
Reactions total373,615
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,600
Videos
1,140
Links
624

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
23m 04s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

702,727 reactions across 279 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375,10653.4%
❤‍🔥75,14810.7%
😁50,9977.26%
🔥39,9695.69%
💘25,7983.67%
🤯21,9783.13%
🥰16,5502.36%
custom 531652430528093321515,3822.19%
😍13,9081.98%
💋13,5611.93%
🍓12,8231.82%
custom 536636694548448059211,6971.66%
💅5,5830.794%
🙈5,2080.741%
🤩3,3520.477%
🤔3,0760.438%
🤗2,3010.327%
🤪2,2350.318%
🌚1,6730.238%
1,1470.163%
14 further kinds5,2350.745%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 279 of the 280 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 702,727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 280 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.357%
1 of 280 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
73,200
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
78,600
over 278 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjbuqNYK113 August 202613 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 280 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC≈51,700 views2,399 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1,420🍓392😁310💋136custom 536636694548448059241❤‍🔥31💘21🥰18

21 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC≈68,000 views3,514 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1,810774💘390custom 5366366945484480592189🤯167🕊44🌚39🔥38

21 Sept 2026, 13:27 UTC≈69,000 views4,101 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2,310🤯902🍓420🔥134🙈71❤‍🔥65🌚57💘56

21 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC≈69,400 views3,632 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2,150🤯607😍410🍓161custom 536636694548448059271💋52💘52🙈52

21 Sept 2026, 13:13 UTC≈74,800 views3,571 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

мы сами не поняли как это так получилось, но я уверена, что вы будете писаться от счастья и удовольствия, когда будете это смотреть

1,790🤯1,090❤‍🔥416🤔91🌚45custom 536636694548448059240😍36🤪30

21 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC≈74,900 views1,936 reactionsread 22 September 2026

мне надо сказать вам кое-что важное…

🤔861🤯461🙈253126💘119🌚44😁23🥰16

20 Sept 2026, 19:46 UTC≈95,200 views3,322 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

наконец-то нашла свою потерянную сестру!! Никогда о ней не знала, но сердце чувствовало, что где-то находится мой родной человек!!! Наконец-то нашлась!! за такое и 10к отдать можно

1,610😁1,160🔥267🙈98🤪70🤯47💘32❤‍🔥20

20 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC≈93,400 views1,376 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

719❤‍🔥238🔥175😁145🙈25🍓20💘20🥰17

20 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC≈84,300 views1,059 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

640💘174🔥119❤‍🔥56🤯23🤔19🥰17🍾6

20 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC≈81,700 views1,264 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

а это я купила себе вибро убийцу в надежде, что он поможет мне убрать пузо… по результатам ничего сказать не могу, но лицо у меня пизднц серьезное…

719😁329💘134❤‍🔥46🤪15🤔10🔥6💅3

20 Sept 2026, 18:41 UTC≈81,900 views1,276 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

сегодня, кстати, в корсете тренировалась и подумала «бля. как бы было круто иметь такую талию…» я хочу сделать себе процедуру лазерной липосакции живота + морфеус8+ бодитайт живот после родов никуда уходить не хочет вообще… то есть да, вы можете сказать, что я ахуела, но я знаю какой живот должен быть в норме(( а так типа кожу подтянут, валик уберут кринж я?

800142🔥127🤯90🤔30🌚24🥰19💘17

20 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTC≈81,100 views4,332 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

стала закрывать после того, как в анонимку написал «скинь нюдсы Евы» я ахуела и не выхуела обратно

🤯3,340632💘222🔥62🙈29🌚16❤‍🔥8🤔8

Showing the 12 most recent of 280 posts we hold for @alexasuka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СИТУАЦИЯ СЮР” (@alexasuka), 413,203 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexasuka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.