Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for alhajuri.org

Channel

alhajuri.org

@alhajuri_org

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,214subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001605433854
TypeChannel
Username@alhajuri_org
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alhajuri_org

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2141,2361,2256 August 2026 — 1,234 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,234 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,236 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,234 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,232 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,226 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,220 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,219 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,216 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,215 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,214 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,211–1,239 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:581,214-1
14 Sept 2026, 21:571,215-1
11 Sept 2026, 00:361,216-3
6 Sept 2026, 06:401,219-1
2 Sept 2026, 07:281,220-6
29 Aug 2026, 21:251,226-6
23 Aug 2026, 21:141,232-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:431,233-1
13 Aug 2026, 07:561,234-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:121,236+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:301,234no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:021,234first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC107 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @scholarsofyemenFile

ترجمة العلامة الحجوري وخلاصة مكانته عند شيخه الإمام الوادعي رحمهما الله The Biography of Al-ʿAllāmah al-Ḥajūrī and a Summary of His Standing With His Shaykh, Imām al-Wādiʿī, may Allāh have mercy upon them both. ألقها فضيلة الشيخ أبي سليمان سلمان العماد حفظه الله Delivered by the Virtuous Shaykh Abū Sulaymān Salmān al-ʿImād, may Allāh preserve him. [14 minutes 38 seconds] Source: https://t.me/scholarsofyemen/2361

3 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC125 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @scholarsofyemen

A Challenge to Those Who Claim Shaykh Yaḥyā “Stole” the Seat of Dammāj The preceding audio presents a clear summary of the extraordinary standing of Shaykh Yaḥyā al-Ḥajūrī—may Allāh preserve him—with his Shaykh, Imām Muqbil ibn Hādī al-Wādiʿī—may Allāh have mercy upon him. The challenge is simple: Bring forward a single student of Imām Muqbil whom he praised, relied upon and entrusted as extensively as Shaykh Yaḥy

29 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC205 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @scholarsofyemenPhoto

﷽ SCHOLARS OF YEMEN This channel has been relaunched with a new name and a unique focus. Its purpose is not merely to share benefits from the scholars and mashāyikh of Ahl al-Sunnah in Yemen—such as lectures, reminders, clips, and translated benefits—so that people may benefit from their knowledge in an organised and accessible manner. Rather, its primary goal is to expose the world to the sheer number of scholar

27 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC618 viewsread 6 August 2026

Our Shaykh, Muqbil ibn Hādī al-Wādiʿī, spoke about some of his own students who caused fitnah against him, my brother. Why did you not cause the same disorder then? Or is it that you look down upon me? That is not correct. Such belittlement may eventually harm you. “A Muslim is the brother of another Muslim: he does not oppress him, forsake him, or look down upon him.” Recorded by Imām Muslim in his Ṣaḥīḥ on the

27 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC575 viewsread 6 August 2026

Shaykh Yaḥyā al-Ḥajūrī Did Not Initiate the Fitnah in Yemen! Our Shaykh, Al-ʿAllāmah, Yaḥyā ibn ʿAlī al-Ḥajūrī—may Allāh preserve him—said: “This is clear and plain advice to the noble father, Shaykh Rabīʿ, may Allāh preserve him, and to all those previously mentioned. This uniting against us, one after another, and these constant attacks against the daʿwah are not pleasing to Allāh. The most that can be said reg

27 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC149 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SalmansalehalemadEng1File

Examples of the Opponents’ Transgressions Against the Wronged ʿAllāmah [Part 1] Commentary of Shaykh Abū Sulaymān Salmān bnu Ṣāliḥ al-ʿImād حفظه الله Transcribed, translated, and prepared by: ʿAbdurraḥmān bnu Mīhūb al-Qaddārī Sources: https://www.sh-salman.com/sounds/621 https://t.me/salmansalehalemad/6715 https://t.me/SalmansalehalemadEng1/31

27 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC226 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gemsofthescholars

BEWARE THE HONOUR OF MUSLIMS Ibn Daqīq al-ʿĪd—may Allāh have mercy on him—said: “The honour of the Muslims is a pit of Hellfire. Two groups from the people are standing at the edge (of this pit): Al-muḥaddithīn wa-al-ḥukkām (i.e. the scholars of ḥadīth and the judges, due to how they have to speak about the conditions of narrators).” [Al-Suyūṭī, Tadrīb al-Rāwī fī Sharḥ Taqrīb al-Nawawī, 2/892] ═══✺✺═══ Transla

24 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC278 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @abuatiyahmahmudVideo

Defending The Honour of A Muslim Brother Shaykh Abū ʿAṭīyah Maḥmūd حفظه الله https://t.me/abuatiyahmahmud/72

18 Jul 2026, 03:42 UTC444 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShaykhYahyaEn

Supporting Good and Ending Wrongdoing Al-ʿAllāmah Yaḥyā al-Ḥajūrī—may Allāh preserve him—said: أنت يا طالب العلم سعيد واللّه أنك مرتاح فإن رأيت معروفا هممت أن تنصره وإن رايت منكرا هممت أن تكسره “O Seeker of Knowledge, you are blessed (or happy), and by Allāh, you are at ease. If you see something good, you are eager to support it. And if you see something wrong, you are eager to put it to an end.” [ليلة الإثنين ١

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alhajuri_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 09:21 UTCAnonymous Poll81 voters

Which Video Intro Do You Prefer?

  1. 1 (AI)16%
  2. 2 (AI)16%
  3. 372%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“alhajuri.org” (@alhajuri_org), 1,214 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alhajuri_org.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.