Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مبارك بن راشد الحثلان

Channel

مبارك بن راشد الحثلان

@alhathlan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,724subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001762011850
TypeChannel
Username@alhathlan
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alhathlan

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7001,7241,7127 August 2026 — 1,700 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,700 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,704 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,708 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,709 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,712 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,714 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,716 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,717 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,721 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,723 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,724 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,696–1,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 16:561,724+1
9 Sept 2026, 21:561,723+2
4 Sept 2026, 16:591,721+4
1 Sept 2026, 13:321,717+1
29 Aug 2026, 07:561,716+2
26 Aug 2026, 07:331,714+2
20 Aug 2026, 03:241,712+3
17 Aug 2026, 12:471,709+1
14 Aug 2026, 13:341,708+4
11 Aug 2026, 05:121,704+4
7 Aug 2026, 10:461,700no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:381,700first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

244 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14760.2%
🔥4920.1%
👍4819.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC214 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

يَا رَبِّ وَاجْعَلْ رَجَائِي غَيْرَ مُنْعَكِسٍ ‏لَدَيْكَ وَاجْعَلْ حِسَابِي غَيْرَ مُنْخَرِمِ ‏. ‏وَالْطُفْ بِعَبْدِكَ فيِ الدَّارَيْنِ إَنَّ لَهُ ‏صَبْرًا مَتَى تَدْعُهُ الأَهْوَالُ يَنْهَزِمِ ‏⁧ #مناجاة⁩

3👍3

6 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTC225 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

كل هذا عند الحافظ ابن رجب من فروع الشرك! وإذا ضممتَ له كلام ابن المبرد الحنبلي في كتابه «التمهيد في الكلام على التوحيد» ستجدهم في واد والذين يتمسحون بهم في واد آخر.

6🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC350 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

عقود من الطعن في علماء الأمة فأخرج الله لهم من أصلابهم من يحاكمهم ويبين تناقضهم هنا أحد أتباع السادة الحدادية 😊 يفحم الشيخ السلفي عبدالرزاق مهدي الذي يصفه محبوه بمحدث الشام، رد مُسكّت لو أدركهما ابن أبي عون لذكر ما جرى بينهما في كتابه. صدقوني لا مندوحة لكم ولا مفر إما أن تعذروا جميع العلماء ومن وافقهم، وإما ستبقون في هذا التناقض وسيجد أتباعكم أن الحدادية -أخزاهم الله- أكثر اتساقًا منكم، فلا تفوتوا الوقت عليكم بلزوم

8🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 01:43 UTC655 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

قد مارس المحقق في هذ الكتاب البتر، فبتر هذه الرواية عن أحمد، وتمامها في المغني. ———————- التعليق والوثيقة منقولة من رد الأخ علي بن علي -جزاه الله خيرا- على منشوري في الفيسبوك.

9🔥3👍2

28 Jul 2026, 02:32 UTC644 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

في تفسير "روح المعاني" للألوسي مباحث شريفة لا تكاد توجد في غيره من التفاسير منها في المجلد التاسع [طبعة الرسالة]: ‏١- كلام الله هل هو بحرف وصوت؟ ص ٣٣٢ ‏٢- رؤية الله وبيان مذهب أهل السنة والمعتزلة ص٣٣٤-٣٥٢ ‏٣- غفران الذنب من غير توبة ص٤٤٢ ‏٤-الميثاق الذي أخذه الله على الخلق ص٤٥٥-٤٦٨

11👍2

24 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC≈1,030 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

10👍1

13 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,190 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مجموع، ومما فيه: ‏- نسخة نادرة نفيسة جدا من كتاب "مقدمة في الأدب" للعلامة الفقيه الكبير أبي يعلى محمد بن الحسين بن محمد بن خلف بن أحمد بن الفراء البغدادي الحنبلي (ت ٤٥٨ هـ)، تامة متقنة، كتبت سنة ١١٦٧ هـ. ‏وهو محفوظ بمكتبة قونية الإقليمية في تركيا: ‏⁦ portal.yek.gov.tr/works/detail/8… ⁩ ‏عنوان الكتاب عند المفهرسين غير ما أثبته، والذي أثبته هو ما ذكره من ترجم له، وهو مما كان في عداد المفقود، هكذا ذكر أحدهم. [منقول م

7👍1

13 Jul 2026, 01:46 UTC795 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mmfmmC

قال ابن عربي: ثم إن الأشاعرة تخيلت أنها لما تأولت قد خرجت من التشبيه وهي ما فارقته إلا أنها انتقلت من التشبيه بالأجسام إلى التشبيه بالمعاني المحدثة المفارقة للنعوت القديمة في الحقيقة. ( الفتوحات المكية )

7

13 Jul 2026, 01:46 UTC786 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mmfmmC

مرعي الكرمي وأهل الوحدة المطلقة [ 1 ] قال مرعي الكرمي: "لَكِن هُنَا تتخبط الْعُقُول فِي هَذِه الْمَعِيَّة الذاتية وَرُبمَا تحصل لكثيرين الزندقة ويتدرج مِنْهَا إِلَى القَوْل بالوحدة الْمُطلقَة كَمَا سَيَأْتِي الْكَلَام على ذَلِك" ( أقاويل الثقات ص ٩٧ ) [ 2 ] قال مرعي الكرمي:" وَمن الْعجب أَنِّي اجْتمعت بأكابر محققي بعض المتصوفة فحصلت المذاكرة فطعن فِي الْفُقَهَاء والمتكلمين والأشاعرة وَقَالَ إِنَّهُم يحرفُونَ مَعَان

7🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alhathlan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قدرات الجامعيين | التهيئة
@AltaheahUni · 32,471
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 5 September 2026
المكتبة الإسلامية الإلكترونية
@IslamicLibrary1 · 40,552
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 August 2026
مكتبة ابن ادريس
@ibnidris · 25,621
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مبارك بن راشد الحثلان” (@alhathlan), 1,724 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alhathlan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.