Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for طلسمات | علی قلهکی

Channel

طلسمات | علی قلهکی

@ali_gholhaky

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,731subscribers

+1,299 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001074650734
TypeChannel
Username@ali_gholhaky
Descriptionان شالله که قلم مجازی ام، غیر از آزادگی ننویسد اکانت توییتر؛ https://twitter.com/aghplt پیج اینستاگرام؛ https://www.instagram.com/aligholhaky کانال ایتا؛ https://eitaa.com/aligholhaky حمایت (بوست): https://t.me/boost/ali_gholhaky نقد و نظر: @agholhaki
Created25 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ali_gholhaky

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

24,400 average views per post against 21,681 subscribers — an engagement rate of 112.7%. Across the 7,801 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.63% and 16.9%, with a median of 8.53%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled439,700
Mature posts only120.5% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers21,681 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 7,801 channels · p10 1.56% · p25 3.63% · p50 8.53% · p75 16.9% · p90 29.2%
Position in cohort99.641th percentile · 13.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.136% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

20,41221,73121,071.56 August 20267 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net +1,299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,214–21,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 09:5821,731+13
6 Nov 2026, 11:1021,718+37
5 Nov 2026, 10:0021,681+14
4 Nov 2026, 06:3921,667+22
3 Nov 2026, 08:5621,645+3
2 Nov 2026, 10:2921,642-4
1 Nov 2026, 12:2621,646+8
31 Oct 2026, 09:3421,638-3
30 Oct 2026, 06:4121,641+12
29 Oct 2026, 08:4821,629+2
28 Oct 2026, 08:2021,627-5
27 Oct 2026, 11:2621,632-4
26 Oct 2026, 10:2921,636-4
25 Oct 2026, 10:5821,640+56
24 Oct 2026, 09:4421,584-5
23 Oct 2026, 10:0921,589-2
22 Oct 2026, 08:3521,591+21
21 Oct 2026, 00:0621,570+46
20 Oct 2026, 01:0621,524+33
19 Oct 2026, 00:3921,491first reading

Engagement

74 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.7%
avg views ÷ 21,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,000
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.902%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 74 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held74 (9 June 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total468,400
Reactions total4,224
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 02:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,950
Videos
≈422
Links
≈1,250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 27s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,412 reactions across 74 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7,67746.8%
👎2,84417.3%
❤2,68816.4%
🤬1,2757.77%
🔥9415.73%
😭3402.07%
😡2861.74%
🤔1871.14%
😱1741.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,412 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (27.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:51 UTC≈21,200 views185 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#بسیار_مهم 🔹بنظر در «سفر دبیر شعام به روسیه» آنهم در شرایطِ مُلتهبِ فعلی، مطالب مهمی در «حوزه‌ جنگ»، «پرونده مذاکره» و «مسائل نظامیِ میانِ دو کشور» رد و بدل شده زیرا بلافاصله پس از سفر سرلشکر رضایی به روسیه این کشور از شهروندان‌ش خواست تا اطلاع ثانوی از سفر به ایران خودداری کرده و یا ایران را ترک کنند! #علی_قلهکی ▪️لینک توییت👇👇👇 https://x.com/aghplt/status/2118414917506076748?a=pMMvjHBuBh-ZA7fJYB4&s=19 ▪️عضو کانال …

👍103❤23👎21😭15🤔11😡6😱6

4 Nov 2026, 20:25 UTC≈16,500 views217 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#هشدار 🔹«نماینده مردم یزد در مجلس» گفته رهبر انقلاب در تجمعات این شهر شرکت کردند؛ سخنرانان چند میدان نیز _از میدان شهدای تهران تا برازجان_ شبیهِ همین خبر را پیش‌تر اعلام کرده بودند! ▪️حضور رهبر انقلاب در حداقل یکی از مواردِ ذکر شده‌ در بالا دقیق است؛ ولی حتما دشمنی «با این میزان از اشراف» و «ناکام در هدف قرار دادن سنگرهای ایران»، به دنبال یافتن ردپایی از حضورِ رهبرانقلاب در میادین _یعنی فضای سَر باز_ است. ▪️مراقبت کن…

👍102😡52❤28👎21😱7🤔6🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈17,900 views396 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#بسیار_مهم 🔹اولین مُچ‌اندازیِ رهبر انقلاب با ترامپ پس از جنگ رمضان، منجر به شکست تاریخیِ جمهوری‌خواهان در کنگره شد و رقیب‌شان پس از ۴۰ سال، بزرگترین اکثریت را در کنگره به دست آورد ▪️«سیاستِ ۳۰ روزه‌ی اخیرِ شعام» که «سختگیرانه‌ ترین سناریو» را از میانِ ۴دستورالعمل برای نظارت و کنترل «تنگه هرمز» در پیش گرفت، دلیلِ مهم شکستِ جمهوری خواهان بود ▪️ترامپ با برآوردِ اشتباه از «توانِ GBU_57» و «ساختار فردو»، وارد «جنگ ۱۲ روزه…

👍223👎113❤25🤬18😱7🔥5😡3🤔2

3 Nov 2026, 14:24 UTC≈18,800 views166 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#بسیار_مهم 🔹اخبار متفاوتی از انعطافِ ایران در موضوع هسته‌ای _برخلاف ایستادگیِ مطلقِ مقاماتِ عالی‌رتبه طی ۸ ماه اخیر_ به گوش می‌رسد؛ صحبت‌های پزشکیان مبنی بر «اخذِ اختیاراتِ جدیدی برای مذاکره» نیز به این گمانه دامن می‌زند! ▪️گویا آمریکایی‌ها پیشنهاد «رقیق‌سازیِ ۴۰۰ کیلوگرم اورانیومِ ۶۰٪» را به جایِ «اخذِ اصلِ مواد» آنهم در ازای، «وقفه در جنگ» و «آزادسازی بخشی از اموالِ بلوکه شده ایران» مطرح کردند و «بازگشاییِ تنگه» نی…

👍74👎44🤬27❤13😡7🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 21:03 UTC≈23,600 views357 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#بسیار_مهم 🔹رهبر شهید انقلاب پیش از جنگ رمضان تهدید کردند که با شروع جنگِ جدید، جنگِ منطقه‌ای رُخ خواهد داد؛ با شروعِ جنگ رمضان، کل منطقه غرب آسیا درگیر جنگ یا متاثر از آن شد ▪️رهبر جدید انقلاب نیز در آستانه «تنش_ توافقِ» جدید (که توافق بنظر دور از ذهن است) تهدید کردند که «محدودیت جغرافیا» در جنگ جدید برداشته شده؛ برآوردِ من از این «تهدیدِ بدونِ محدودیتِ جغرافیا»، «اروپا»ست! #علی_قلهکی ▪️لینک توییت👇👇👇 https://x.com/…

👍261👎57❤22🤬11🔥6

29 Oct 2026, 13:53 UTC≈24,400 views167 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#بسیار_مهم 🔹پرسش «باراک راویدِ» آکسیوس درباره نامه «ونس» و پاسخ‌م درباره بخشی از جزییاتِ آن ▪️پرسش باراک راوید: منظورتان همان نامه ونس است؟! 🔻پاسخ‌م: بله؛ همان «نامه» یا به‌عبارت‌دیگر، «پیام سطح بالا». اگر آمریکا بر بازرسی از اماکن هسته‌ای بمباران‌شده و تأسیسات جدید (فردو و کوه کلنگ) و همچنین تحویل گرفتن اورانیوم با غنای ۶۰ درصد اصرار کند (خواسته‌ای که از خطوط قرمز رهبری جدید عبور می‌کند) و هم‌زمان تهدید به جنگ پس ا…

🔥54❤40👍32👎31🤔5😡3😭2

28 Oct 2026, 21:31 UTC≈24,600 views139 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#مهم 🔹«پیامِ سطحِ بالایی» که اخیرا از آمریکا به سمت ایران آمده هم «پیشنهاداتی» دارد، با «محورهایِ نشدنی» و هم «تهدیداتی» دارد با «اهدافی بی‌ثمر!» ▪️پی‌نوشت: به زودی درباره جزئیات آن خواهم نوشت! #علی_قلهکی ▪️لینک توییت👇👇👇 https://x.com/aghplt/status/2115556420368093197?a=dJf4gxahYHjg2PQDf18&s=19 ▪️عضو کانال شوید👇👇👇 @ali_gholhaky https://t.me/+k5vwYFON3XU1OWY0

👍90👎26❤14🔥5😡4

26 Oct 2026, 21:20 UTC≈25,500 views253 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#تاسف 🔹از اینکه «پاک‌نژاد»، وزیر سابق نفت با این میزان از سومدیریت، شبهات و اتهامات چرا یکسال دیر عزل شد تعجب نکنید؛ از این «حیرت» کنید که چرا الان مشاورِ «رییس جمهور» است! #علی_قلهکی ▪️لینک توییت👇👇👇 https://x.com/aghplt/status/2114828317547524220 ▪️عضو کانال شوید👇👇👇 @ali_gholhaky https://t.me/+k5vwYFON3XU1OWY0

👍183👎31😱20🤬11❤8

24 Oct 2026, 09:45 UTC≈32,200 views242 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#بسیار_مهم 🔹میزانِ پروازهای ترابری آمریکا به منطقه طی دو هفته‌ی گذشته، افزایش چشمگیری نسبت به یک ماهِ قبل داشته؛ برآوردم این است حمله به ایران توسط اسرائیل و آمریکا قطعی بوده و حمله‌ی دشمن تابعِ «تجمیعِ اهدافِ اصابتی _اعم از ترور و تاسیسات_ در ساعات اولیه حمله» و «بیشترین غافلگیریِ ایران» است نه زمانِ انجامِ عملیات! ▪️اصابت کوهِ کلنگ توسط سلاحِ خاص یا غیرمتعارف توسط دشمن _که به نظر دیگر قطعی شده_ در «اراده مسیرِ هسته…

🤬118👍59❤25👎16🔥11😭6😱4🤔3

21 Oct 2026, 19:46 UTC≈28,500 views312 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#هشدار 🔹پاکستان و عراق _در همکاری کاملِ با آمریکا_ بخشی از مرزهای زمینی خود را با ایران بستند! ▪️«علی الزیدی» نخست وزیر عراق که کُرسیِ نخست‌وزیری‌اش را مدیونِ همسایه خود است، گستاخی‌های پیدا و پنهانِ زیادی نسبت به ایران داشته؛ وی در ماجرای بستن آسمان عراق بر روی پروازهای ایران، تذکری جدی از روحانیت عالی رتبه عراق و همچنین جریانات موثر دریافت کرد و موقتا عقب‌نشینی کرد. در صورت ادامه شیطنت‌های «الزیدی»، وی بَدلِ به درس…

👍207👎71❤17😱6🤬5🔥3🤔3

20 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC≈31,300 views363 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#بسیار_مهم 🔹انتشار رسمی موضعِ ایران توسط دبیر شعام که «حتی ذره‌ای از مواد هسته‌ای غنی‌شده از ایران خارج نخواهد شد» عملا شکستِ «احیای طرح هسته‌ای سابق ایران» توسط روسیه بود؛ طرحِ این مساله و رسانه‌ای شدنِ آن در دیدار با «عاصم منیر» یعنی هم «لاوروف» و هم «عاصم منیر» دست‌ِخالی از ایران برگشتند! ▪️طی ماه‌های اخیر فعل و انفعالاتی در ایران رُخ داده که شاید «۴۰۰کیلوگرم اورانیوم‌ ۶۰٪»، مصرفِ داخلی پیدا کند! #علی_قلهکی ▪️لین…

👍278👎30❤27🔥14😡6😱6😭2

20 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈26,700 views211 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#اختصاصی 🔹سفرِ «لاورف» وزیر خارجه روسیه به تهران، «نتیجه مشخصی در زمینه مذاکره» نداشت و «بدون دستاوردِ خاصی» پایان یافت! #علی_قلهکی ▪️لینک توییت👇👇👇 https://x.com/aghplt/status/2112519782071238708 ▪️عضو کانال شوید👇👇👇 @ali_gholhaky https://t.me/+k5vwYFON3XU1OWY0

👍135🔥43😱16❤8👎4🤔4😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @ali_gholhaky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“طلسمات | علی قلهکی” (@ali_gholhaky), 21,731 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ali_gholhaky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.