Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ali Marvi علی مروی

Channel

Ali Marvi علی مروی

@ali_marvi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,961subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001106425966
TypeChannel
Username@ali_marvi
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ali_marvi

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9613,0162,988.56 August 2026 — 3,016 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,016 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,015 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,014 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,013 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,010 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,008 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,004 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,003 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,002 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,980 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,973 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,966 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,961 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,953–3,024 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:172,961-5
14 Sept 2026, 00:582,966-7
10 Sept 2026, 05:382,973-7
5 Sept 2026, 05:022,980-22
1 Sept 2026, 05:453,002-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:083,003-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:433,004-4
22 Aug 2026, 16:153,008-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:433,010-3
16 Aug 2026, 15:083,013-1
13 Aug 2026, 03:043,014-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:013,015-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:153,016no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:063,016first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 34s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13352.8%
👍9738.5%
👎103.97%
👏51.98%
🔥41.59%
🤔31.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC927 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

48👎4👏3

29 May 2026, 06:59 UTC≈1,910 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

15👎1

8 May 2026, 21:39 UTC≈2,200 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @aja_mediaPhoto

📊 داده‌نما | عملیات موشکی‌_پهپادی شهید مایوان 🔹 بامداد جمعه ۱۸ اردیبهشت ماه، درحالی که نیروی دریایی آمریکا سعی در خارج نمودن ۳ ناوشکن متخلف خود با پشتیبانی هوایی از تنگه هرمز به سمت دریای عمان را داشت، نیروی دریایی ارتش جمهوری‌ اسلامی ایران در یک عملیات ترکیبی موشکی-پهپادی با ۸ موشک کروز و ۲۴فروند پهپاد انتحاری این ناوگروه را مورد تهاجم قرار داد. 🔹 در نتیجه این عملیات و با وجود تلاش گسترده برای دفع تهاجم از سمت نیرو

18

8 May 2026, 08:00 UTC≈1,750 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

تحلیلی قابل تامل از اتفاقات دیشب در تنگه هرمز و خلیج فارس. اتفاقات امشب و شبهای آتی نشون خواهد داد که چقدر این تحلیل و برداشت پیروزی ایران در عملیات دیشب صحیح بوده. البته رفتار ترامپ از جمله تهدید ضمنی به حمله اتمی هم این برداشت که عملیات دیشب به نفع ایران بوده رو تقویت میکنه.

👍9👎1

8 May 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,810 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

روایت یک فریب چندلایه؛ چگونه واشینگتن «شکست در دریا» را با «اخبار فیک» بزک کرد؟ آنچه در شب ۷ مه ۲۰۲۶ در دهانه هرمز گذشت، یک «پینگ‌پنگ نظامی» (Tit for Tat) نبود؛ بلکه پایانی بر هژمونی دریایی آمریکا بود که زیر آوار بیانیه‌های مطبوعاتی و اکانت‌های فیک پنهان شد. بیایید با کنار هم گذاشتن فکت‌های میدانی، منطق این نبرد را مرور کنیم: ۱. فروپاشی سپر دفاعی و فرار ناوها (The Tactical Defeat) روایت رسمی می‌گوید: «ناوها دفاع ک

9👎1

8 May 2026, 06:56 UTC811 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ClashReportVideo

Trump: If there’s no ceasefire, you’ll see one big glow coming out of Iran.

1

8 May 2026, 06:56 UTC799 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ترامپ: اگر آتش‌بس برقرار نشود، یک نور بزرگ و مهیب را خواهید دید که از ایران به آسمان برمی‌خیزد. تهدید اتمی؟!!!! گرچه از اتفاقات دیشب در تنگه هرمز فیلم و تصویر واضحی بیرون نیامده، اما رفتار ترامپ از جمله تهدید فوق نشون میده که عملیات دیشب به نفع ایران بوده.

👍12🤔1

8 May 2026, 06:51 UTC917 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

طنز ماجرا اینجاست که دستور ترامپ به نیروی دریایی آمریکا برای رفت‌وآمد مکرر در تنگه هرمز، با هدف نشان دادن باز بودن این مسیر، در عمل دقیقاً برعکس عمل می‌کند و نشان می‌دهد که اگر کشتی‌های دیگر بخواهند از این آبراه عبور کنند، چقدر در معرض تیراندازی و خطر قرار می‌گیرند.

👍9

7 May 2026, 21:41 UTC989 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بیانیه سنتکام (قرارگاه مرکزی آمریکا در منطقه ما!): «نیروهای آمریکایی حملات بی‌دلیل ایران را رهگیری کردند و با حملات دفاع از خود پاسخ دادند، زیرا ناوشکن‌های موشک‌انداز نیروی دریایی ایالات متحده در ۷ می از تنگه هرمز به خلیج عمان عبور کردند. نیروهای ایرانی چندین موشک، پهپاد و قایق کوچک را هنگام عبور ناوهای USS Truxtun (DDG 103)، USS Rafael Peralta (DDG 115) و USS Mason (DDG 87) از گذرگاه دریایی بین‌المللی شلیک کردند.

2👍1

7 May 2026, 21:34 UTC803 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

لحظات، دقایق و ساعات به شدت حساسی برای کشورمان است. مقابله با تلاش مذبوحانه دشمن برای باز کردن تنگه هرمز از یکسو و تلاش برای شکستن محاصره دریایی، از سوی دیگر. برای رزمندگان عزیزمان و پیروزی ایرانمان و تقویت محور مقاومت دعا کنید.

15

7 May 2026, 20:56 UTC808 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9👍2👎2🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ali_marvi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال صادق الحسینی
@Sadegh_Alhosseini · 56,598
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ali Marvi علی مروی” (@ali_marvi), 2,961 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ali_marvi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.