Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ali from China

Channel

Ali from China

@ali_predictions

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,346subscribers

+303 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517465413
TypeChannel
Username@ali_predictions
Created24 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ali_predictions

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,400 average views per post against 12,353 subscribers — an engagement rate of 92.7%. Across the 23,718 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.44% and 21.5%, with a median of 11.0%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (12 August 2026 11 September 2026)
Posts measured24 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled274,750
Mature posts only95.4% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers12,353 measured 8 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,718 channels · p10 2.79% · p25 5.44% · p50 11.0% · p75 21.5% · p90 38.5%
Position in cohort99.127th percentile · 8.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.238% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 11 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,04212,35412,1986 August 2026 — 12,043 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,043 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,045 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,048 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,050 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,048 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,053 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,051 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,043 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,044 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,042 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,043 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,106 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,126 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,147 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,148 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,149 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,164 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,197 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,204 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,202 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,210 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,218 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,231 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,239 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,304 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,344 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,354 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,353 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,346 subscribers12,3466 August 202611 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 36 days, net +303. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,995–12,401 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 12:0112,346-7
8 Sept 2026, 21:5912,353-1
5 Sept 2026, 12:1512,354+10
3 Sept 2026, 15:2112,344+40
2 Sept 2026, 09:0512,304+65
1 Sept 2026, 11:2512,239+8
31 Aug 2026, 11:4612,231+13
30 Aug 2026, 11:3812,218+8
29 Aug 2026, 14:5712,210+8
28 Aug 2026, 14:5312,202-2
27 Aug 2026, 14:5512,204+7
26 Aug 2026, 17:4312,197+26
25 Aug 2026, 16:1712,171+7
24 Aug 2026, 13:1612,164+15
22 Aug 2026, 18:0612,149+1
21 Aug 2026, 10:0412,148+1
20 Aug 2026, 11:3812,147+21
19 Aug 2026, 13:3812,126+20
18 Aug 2026, 12:5812,106+63
17 Aug 2026, 12:4212,043first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.1%
avg views ÷ 12,346 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,200
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held39 (25 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total258,650
Reactions total5,533
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 22:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 16s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9,107 reactions across 38 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,69640.6%
🔥2,82231.0%
🤝1,21613.4%
💯98610.8%
🫡3874.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:30 UTC≈3,770 views252 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#вероятности #ментал УКРАИНА Ремарка: это необычный пост, на канале почти нет не расшифрованных символов. Но сегодня отойдём от этого правила и посмотрим на чистые образы, до расшифровки. там что-то идёт в переносном смысле, а что-то в прямом, но что именно — покажет будущее. -★-★-★- 🧩У господствующего украинского политического режима окончательно оформился внутренний враг — это ВСУ. 🧩Галитчина воткнёт нож в спи

125🔥75🤝40💯10🫡2

1 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC≈6,930 views267 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#ментал РОССИИ ОБЪЯВИЛИ ВОЙНУ Кто и почему Предпосылка к поездке — гнев и ярость Рэтклиффа. Если воспроизводить ситуацию через целостную информацию, через астрал, рисуется следующая картинка: У Рэтклиффа прямо сейчас длинный и важный сольный проект в США. До пяти разных источников докладывают что-то Рэтклиффу, в основном с Ближнего Востока и Африки. Дескать, РФ собирается сделать что-то, что просто хоронит их тонко

140🔥100🤝15🫡11💯1

1 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC≈6,950 views415 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В общем, один из бункеров был вскрыт, и по особой случайности к этому приложила руку не только Россия, но и кто-то другой, кто с ней в дружбе. В общем, с этого объекта взяли что-то, и предполагается, что это теперь у России, либо очень скоро будет в России. Это что-то — люди, техника или искусственный интеллект какой-то, понять совершенно невозможно. Всё описывается словами «Объект X1», «Объект X2», «Объект X3» и том

🔥230115🫡47🤝20💯3

1 Sept 2026, 12:14 UTC≈6,850 views306 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#ИМХО Немного конспирологии об этой троице: Рэтклифф очень живой дядька, его тонкие структуры отлично сканируются, все как у людей, тела, поля, чакры, подключки, энергетические паразиты. Он их кстати понацеплял во время участия в «особых» ритуалах посвящений, ну вы знаете три шестерки и все такое. У него прямо из муладхары идёт огромный рукав откачки жизненной энергии. Это чакра между ног, если что. Персонаж из Ват

🔥16382🤝31🫡19💯11

1 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC≈6,750 views137 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Джон Ли Рэтклифф, John Lee Ratcliffe, род. 20.10.1965 Директор ЦРУ. Сергей Викторович Клантарян (по маме Лавров) Род. 21.03.1950 Глава МИД РФ Пол Ричард Галлахер, Paul Richard Gallagher, Род. 23.01.1954 Глава МИД Ватикана Эти люди встречались, когда директор ЦРУ прилетал в РФ на военно-транспортном самолёте.

🔥8831🤝18

29 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈10,300 views365 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#вероятности Не думал, что напишу это. И пишу не для того, чтобы пугать, а чтобы зафиксировать событие. РОССИИ ОБЪЯВИЛИ ВОЙНУ Хорошо, если до 2027 года доживём в том состоянии, как сейчас. Хотя, если знать неточность Али в сроках, то может и доживём, и переживём. Как бы то ни было, налеты украинских дронов на Wildberries и OZON покажутся десткими шалостями. Остальное первого сентября. Ваш Али, Продолжение следу

157🤝79🫡65🔥49💯15

29 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC≈10,500 views103 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#сбывалочка На канале эта вероятность датирована первым декабря прошлого года. Дядька «присел» и «привстал» уже. Спасибо Сергею Д.! Али

54🔥32🤝17

27 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC≈12,200 views132 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Граница Непала и Камбоджи — сель после паводков.

🔥6728🫡22🤝15

27 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC≈11,400 views164 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🪖#сво Знаю, что родственники ждут ответов, просто уведомляю, что сейчас уже отвечаю на августовские обращения. Как всегда БЕЗВОЗМЕЗДНО! От родственников требуется дать: ФИО, дату рождения, дату пропажи, фото. [email protected] Ваш Али

125🤝28🔥11

25 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC≈13,900 views230 reactionsread 2 September 2026

#сбывалочка 18 мая 2023 г. https://t.me/ali_predictions/712 Вероятности: когда вы услышите про национализацию заводов, когда она начнет происходить массово, начинайте готовиться к войне. Следующим шагом будет не только военная мобилизация, которая уже идёт, тогда будет и трудовая мобилизация на государственные предприятия. Все это пока в будущем, но уже в близком будущем. 3 августа 2023 https://t.me/ali_predictions

🔥12450🤝36💯16🫡4

25 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC≈10,100 views91 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#сбывалочка

🔥6920💯2

25 Aug 2026, 03:24 UTC≈10,700 views113 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

#сбывалочка Недолго ждать пришлось Спасибо Сергею Д. Ваш Али, Продолжение следует...

💯6634🔥13

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @ali_predictions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ali_predictions edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Таро Юлия Петрова Official
@taroyuliapetrova · 28,995
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Hyperborea
@hyperboreaX · 58,261
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Охотник на связи
@ohotnik_na_sviazy · 74,762
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ali from China” (@ali_predictions), 12,346 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ali_predictions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.