Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 客户评价之阿良会所

Channel

客户评价之阿良会所

@aliangdechngdu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,827subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002026185297
TypeChannel
Username@aliangdechngdu
Created8 March 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aliangdechngdu

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8271,8611,8446 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,856 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,854 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,846 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,850 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,855 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,850 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,846 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,845 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,836 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,828 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,827 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,822–1,866 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:551,827-1
14 Sept 2026, 08:541,828-8
10 Sept 2026, 19:181,836-9
6 Sept 2026, 02:591,845-1
1 Sept 2026, 12:461,846-4
26 Aug 2026, 06:121,850-5
23 Aug 2026, 05:451,855+5
19 Aug 2026, 07:421,850+4
16 Aug 2026, 18:171,846-8
13 Aug 2026, 11:151,854-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:341,856-4
7 Aug 2026, 13:461,860-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:191,861first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 8 March 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
777.8%
👍111.1%
🙏111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

客人好评,客人要推荐他朋友来,还要给我宣传

4 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC488 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

成华区半套,服务一般,客人刚刚满意,不好不差的评价

1

2 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC892 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

大哥吃好了,也耍好了,你们想知道是哪家店吗?

1 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,020 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

我胡汉三又回来了😁😁😁😁😁

30 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC≈1,630 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🥳🥳🥳成都全区会所,半套全套攻略 ①.关于半套: 半套会所价格参差不齐,460-620、500-650、550-680 基本这几种价格.其价格差距体现在(环境.地段.运营成本上)质量是差不多的.。价格 和质量没有特别大的关系) 750、800、900、1000 这些价格越高的店子就越是体现店子环境和质量了 ②.成都会所的服务:在管理、不在技师 (技师流动性很大,每个会所也需要流动性来增加活力)好的会所,技师做不好服务 是会被罚款的.) ③.关于照片: 技师提供照片大多精修过,遮脸、美颜、滤镜、甚至假照(更多的是不愿意)技师也 有朋友家人,妹子大多数成都周边的,害怕亲戚朋友看见。在人人美颜的时代(现场选,最可靠) 本人从不主动推荐提前约技师,怕你约定的时间不能及时到,每个喜欢的口味不一样,推荐的妹子你看不上妹子白等你半个小时,或则你白等半个小时,得罪人。 如果你有熟悉的技师,我可以

5👍1🙏1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @aliangdechngdu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“客户评价之阿良会所” (@aliangdechngdu), 1,827 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aliangdechngdu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.