Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дыши с Аленой Алиджик

Channel

Дыши с Аленой Алиджик

@alijik_school

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,606subscribers

-156 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001451259772
TypeChannel
Username@alijik_school
DescriptionКанал о дыхании от учителя с 12-летним опытом Как надышать свою энергию, уверенность и здоровье: - повысь эффективность на 1000% - раскрой возможности тела 🔗INST: alijik 🔗WhatsApp: +7 778 404-61-93 Связь Telegram: @alena_alijik Отзывы: @aira_breath
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/alijik_school

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,5938,7628,677.57 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,754 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,739 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,737 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,732 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,727 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,720 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,715 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,709 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,702 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,695 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,679 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,663 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,635 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,620 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,604 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,602 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,603 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,593 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,634 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,633 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,618 subscribers2 November 2026 — 8,606 subscribers8,6067 August 20262 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 87 days, net -156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,568–8,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 20:198,606-12
30 Oct 2026, 17:568,618-15
27 Oct 2026, 11:148,633-1
24 Oct 2026, 05:068,634+41
21 Oct 2026, 10:078,593-10
17 Oct 2026, 22:158,603+1
15 Oct 2026, 06:298,602-2
12 Oct 2026, 02:388,604-16
5 Oct 2026, 05:418,620-15
26 Sept 2026, 21:408,635-28
17 Sept 2026, 18:408,663-16
13 Sept 2026, 16:008,679-16
10 Sept 2026, 05:378,695-7
4 Sept 2026, 19:188,702-7
1 Sept 2026, 04:178,709-6
28 Aug 2026, 22:128,715-5
26 Aug 2026, 04:338,720-7
23 Aug 2026, 09:588,727-5
19 Aug 2026, 13:068,732-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:548,737first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.91%
avg views ÷ 8,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
422
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held71 (24 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total8,869
Reactions total819
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 22:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,200
Videos
≈709
Links
≈721

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 17s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,946 reactions across 70 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,70157.7%
🔥74025.1%
🙏1645.57%
💯1414.79%
😍832.82%
👍371.26%
❤‍🔥250.849%
🥰120.407%
👏110.373%
🤩90.305%
👌60.204%
😱50.17%
🤝40.136%
🤗30.102%
😁20.068%
🕊10.034%
🗿10.034%
😭10.034%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,946 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 71 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alijik_school. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (4.76%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 14:04 UTC195 views19 reactions1 Starread 5 November 2026

Раньше об этом знали только мои ученики Впервые я открываю программу кармического менеджмента для всех. Она для тех, кто устал от долгов и хочет, чтобы деньги пошли, хочет новых клиентов и свое дело, копит злость и обиды и хочет внутреннего спокойствия, мечтает наладить отношения с мужем, мамой, детьми, хочет ездить, путешествовать и быть среди своих людей. Те, кто заполнит анкету предзаписи, получат лучшие услови…

❤12🔥5🙏2

5 Nov 2026, 13:23 UTC221 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Мы все ищем причину НЕ ТАМ И не только в деньгах. Красота – причина удачного замужества? Девчонки, сколько сил вы вкладываете, чтобы себя улучшить. А все ли выходят замуж удачно? Все ли счастливы в семье? А кто-то хочет еще и богатого мужа, но не получается встретить ни богатого, ни хорошего. Налоги. Сэкономлю, и денег останется больше. Посмотрите на известных блогеров, которые так думали. Огромные штрафы. Кого-то…

❤16🔥4💯2

5 Nov 2026, 10:56 UTC252 views31 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Работа – не причина денег. Спорим? Что приносит деньги? Вы сейчас скажете – ну, работа, муж, наследство, может. А для большинства так вообще хочешь денег, иди работай. Давайте проверим на людях, которых вы знаете: — Много работают и много зарабатывают. Знаете таких? Конечно. — Мало работают и мало зарабатывают. Тоже знаете. — Много работают, а денег мало. Пашут, пашут, как папа Карло, а денег не прибавляется. Мы…

❤24🔥5🙏2

5 Nov 2026, 08:56 UTC256 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Через 5 минут жду вас на эфире Дорогие, не пропустите. Жду вас тут ровно через 5 минут: https://www.instagram.com/alijik

❤3💯1🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC352 views31 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

От чего зависят ваши деньги? Как перестать завидовать чужим деньгам и начать создавать свои? Завтра в 12:00 по Москве проведу эфир в запрещенной сети и отвечу на эти, и другие вопросы по теме денег. Кто будет? Поставьте реакцию❤️

❤23🔥4🤩4

4 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC333 views21 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Целый чемодан духовной жизни Раньше я бы никогда не подумала, что буду возить в ручной клади то, что является самым дорогим в моей жизни. Не украшения или дорогая одежда, а алтарь и бесценные книги моего Учителя. А что вы возите с собой?

❤13🔥5👏3

4 Nov 2026, 14:57 UTC308 views28 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤15😍7🔥6

4 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC403 views65 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥32❤25💯7👍1

4 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC347 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Poll

Слышали или говорили когда-нибудь сами фразу «Завидую белой завистью»?

  1. Говорила, было27%
  2. Слышала неоднократно36%
  3. И говорила, и слышала41%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤9🔥3❤‍🔥2

3 Nov 2026, 13:23 UTC434 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

4 привычки, которые изменят характер и карму Мне не стало легче, пока я не стала менять СЕБЯ. Само ничего не изменилось. Всеми силами и всеми средствами я старалась стать человеком, на которого можно положиться и у которого можно учиться. Что мне в этом помогло? Первое, учителя. Одной мне было не справиться. Нужен был человек, который скажет, где я иду не туда, и знания, которых у меня не было. Все, что я сейчас да…

❤39🔥8💯6🙏2

3 Nov 2026, 06:27 UTC483 views68 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Я невыносимый человек Так было раньше… Скандальная. С бывшими мужьями война, ненависть, обвинения, которые до сих пор неловко вспоминать. Подруг теряла, и назад они не возвращались. С мамой не общались. Со мной было трудно договориться. На меня нельзя было рассчитывать. Меня не понимали. Это я к чему? Гневаться, обижаться, осуждать это не характер. Это привычка. Я ее сеяла каждый день и каждый день получала то, чт…

❤38🙏17🔥13

2 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC582 views70 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Папа умер, а мамы давно нет в моей жизни Так я отвечала, когда меня спрашивали про родителей. Папа умер в 2007, когда родился мой сын. А с мамой у нас с самого детства, лет с 5-6, была бесконечная вражда. Бесконечные споры. Потом мы просто перестали общаться на три года. Мама заблокировала меня и не хотела разговаривать. Обид было столько, что казалось, преодолеть это невозможно в этой жизни. Я чувствовала себя си…

❤46🔥15🤩5❤‍🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @alijik_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTCAnonymous Poll70 voters

Слышали или говорили когда-нибудь сами фразу «Завидую белой завистью»?

  1. Говорила, было27%
  2. Слышала неоднократно36%
  3. И говорила, и слышала41%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTCAnonymous Poll98 voters

Какие видео вам были бы интересны? Не более 3-х вариантов.

  1. Длинные видео на разные темы17%
  2. Медиации49%
  3. Комплексы дыхательных практик94%
  4. Подкасты31%
  5. Интервью4%
  6. Видео с ответами на ваши вопросы22%
  7. Влоги7%

The shares total 224%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fedor Belogai
@belogaifedor · 38,672
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
КАНАЛ ТРЕНЕРА КСЮ
@trenerksenia · 26,464
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Мила Левчук о любви
@milalevchuk · 48,321
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Мария Коновалова - Всё о женском здоровье
@dockonovalovamarija · 63,339
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дыши с Аленой Алиджик” (@alijik_school), 8,606 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alijik_school.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.