Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 35 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82–93 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 16:19
83
-1
5 Sept 2026, 19:00
84
-7
23 Aug 2026, 11:24
91
-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:00
92
no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:03
92
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5215694003772602731
11
39.3%
👍
9
32.1%
🥰
6
21.4%
custom 5377821906730753532
1
3.57%
🔥
1
3.57%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷
🩷🩷🩷
🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷
Не про позы. Про тот самый взгляд: «Это всё мне?!» 😍
Про прыжок сквозь цветное облако и смешное встряхивание, когда краска щекочет нос. Именно эти секунды я и хочу сохранить для тебя. 🐶✨
📍 Место: Парк света (огороженная площадка для собак, Ленинская, Находка).
Там тихо, спокойно, и твой хвостик может быть просто собой — без стресса и спешки. 🌿
Пакеты:
🔸 «Мини» — 1500 ₽: 20 мин, 10–12 обработанн…
🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷
🐾 Тихий праздник цвета для твоих хвостиков — 16 августа 🐶🌈
Сквер Первой маёвки, огороженная площадка — здесь спокойно, нет толп, и можно дать собаке побегать, не переживая ни о чём.Мы не будем требовать «идеальных поз». Наоборот — поймаем то, за что ты любишь своего пса: смешной прыжок, взгляд, когда он замирает от восторга, момент, когда облако краски кружится вокруг него… Такие кадры потом хочется пересм…
Как профессиональный фотограф, могу сказать: редко соглашаюсь на фотосессии без животных, но этот проект был крайне рискованным и получился просто потрясающим! 🔥📸✨
🌥️ Облачная погода — мой любимый «союзник» на съёмке. Она даёт мягкий свет, убирает жёсткие тени и делает кадры глубже.
📩 Если хотите такую же серию — расскажу, как всё организовать: помогу с локацией, образами и подбором лошади поможет конный клуб "Максимус". Пишите в личные сообщения.
📍Работаю в Находке и окрестностях.
📸 Фотограф-анималист.
#фотографНаходка #фотосессияслошадью #услугифотографа #морскаясъёмка
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @alina_photographer_dv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алина Чебулаева | фотограф-анималист | г.Находка” (@alina_photographer_dv), 83 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alina_photographer_dv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
