Channel
@alinareis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
121subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003455231688 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alinareis |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alinareis |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 121 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 120 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 121 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:50 | 121 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 46.2% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 28.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 9.62% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 7.69% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пишет мне вчера моя СММ Аня голосовое сообщение… говорит Алин, а что там за история, вы уверены что это не PR-ход? У доктора Фролова за три дня 16 тыс* подписчиков пришло… -Я говорю а сколько у клиники пришло? -Три тысячи -Смотри, получается личный бренд врача у коллег подрос хорошо, а бренд клиники - не особо. Если бы этот доктор основной свой доход получал как спикер, то мы могли бы с тобой это хотя бы обсудить. Н…
❤2🔥2
19 000 человек за два дня. Интересная математика общественной реакции. Третий день сообщество обсуждает историю Алексея Фролова,каждый эксперт уже разобрал ее и прокомментировал - юристы дают правовую оценку, врачи оценивают клинические аспекты и выражают поддержку. А мы рассмотрели с точки зрения коммуникации и поведения аудитории. Важный момент: мы считаем важным пресекать любые попытки найти в этой ситуации плю…
👍5
С удовольствием и пользой послушала, спасибо, Алина 🤩
Дорогие, я нежно напоминаю вам о том, что любой мой полезный контент можно сохранять, репостить и отправлять кому-то, кому это может быть важно☺️
🔥3
Я себе даже в избранное сохранила, вдруг когда-то пригодится!!! Спасибо, правда очень информативно и полезно!!!
Алина, спасибо большое за столь полезную и развернутую информацию ✨ как всегда все четко и грамотно ✊🏻
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤7
Перезаписываю)))
Так,а я его жду,первые два прослушала с большим интересом! Как мне нравятся твои разборы по косточкам 🤓 Это так четко ,по делу и с разных ракурсов.
❤4
Кажется у меня удалился последний подкаст🤣
🤯2😱2
И третье - последнее. Про то, как комментировать подобное если вам не повезло сниматься в «разоблачениях» в роли эксперта⬇️
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alinareis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АЛИНА РЕЙС | Публичные выступления в медицине” (@alinareis), 121 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alinareis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.