Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 39 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 993–1,020 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 14:00
996
-4
11 Sept 2026, 17:17
1,000
-2
2 Sept 2026, 18:38
1,002
-2
27 Aug 2026, 14:17
1,004
+1
24 Aug 2026, 14:45
1,003
-2
21 Aug 2026, 02:12
1,005
-2
18 Aug 2026, 01:06
1,007
-2
14 Aug 2026, 17:58
1,009
-7
11 Aug 2026, 12:15
1,016
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:32
1,017
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:10
1,017
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 59s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
250 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
152
60.8%
🔥
35
14.0%
👍
18
7.20%
💯
17
6.80%
❤🔥
11
4.40%
😍
11
4.40%
⚡
4
1.60%
🥰
2
0.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 5 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alionaapr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Louis Vuitton выиграл суд, но кажется, ополчил против себя Китай
Если вы давно меня читаете, то знаете, что я очень люблю разбирать истории не только с точки зрения маркетинга, но и с точки зрения того, как на самом деле формируется репутация бренда. И вот сейчас как раз произошел очень интересный кейс.
Предполагаю, многие знают, что азиатский рынок, особенно китайский, один из самых больших и самых важных для миро…
Во Франции больше 40 000 замков, но как выделяться именно нам?
Такой вопрос я задала себе, когда начинала строить стратегию для Ирины и замка.
Размышляла я, если честно, недолго, потому что довольно быстро поняла: пытаться конкурировать количеством мраморных каминов, красотой интерьеров или историей замка бессмысленно. Во Франции тысячи невероятных шато, и, если открыть Instagram, через несколько минут все они нач…
Почему миллионы просмотров и сотни тысяч подписчиков ещё не означают, что блог будет приносить большие деньги и возможности
На протяжении нескольких лет я говорю о том, что залетевшие видео, огромное количество подписчиков и даже многомиллионные охваты сами по себе вообще не гарантируют, что вы будете хорошо зарабатывать благодаря социальным сетям.
Потому что всё всегда упирается в стратегию.
Недавно наткнулась на…
До сих пор не могу поверить, но это теперь моя жизнь ❤️
Две недели назад мне пришло уведомление о том, что мое ВНЖ по визе талантов одобрено на 4 года до июля 2030!
Несмотря на то, что карточку я еще не получила (ее производство занимает 1-2 месяца), я уже успела это отметить 🥳
Досье готовила лично сама практически год, вопросов у префектуры не возникло, поэтому горжусь собой (учитывая, что сейчас статистика очен…
Почему Роулинг написала книги о волшебстве?
Таким вопросом я часто задавалась, анализируя книги о Гарри Поттере. Ведь это надо иметь не только определенный склад ума, но и постоянно погружать себя в этот мир.
Мне казалось это довольно сложным.
В четверг я прилетела в Эдинбург. Сходила в кафе, где Роулинг писала книги ежедневно (фото №1).
Посетила улицу, которая стала прототипом «Косого переулка» (фото №3).
Подн…
❤37❤🔥11😍9⚡4🥰2👍1🔥1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @alionaapr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мария Солодар | Интернет-маркетинг и фриланс @marketing_Solodar · 22,212 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Юлия Ланске I Любовь, Мужчины и Замужество @Jlanske_rosa · 26,808 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алёна Пиар (aliona pr)” (@alionaapr), 996 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alionaapr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.