Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 21 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,134–4,158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:59
4,137
-2
13 Sept 2026, 08:41
4,139
-5
9 Sept 2026, 13:35
4,144
-10
1 Sept 2026, 04:18
4,154
-1
29 Aug 2026, 01:42
4,155
no change
28 Aug 2026, 06:46
4,155
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 41s
Average length
11m 41s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
779 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5202110972130501354
250
32.1%
custom 5240172542810925173
191
24.5%
custom 5199718662461728933
126
16.2%
🆒
68
8.73%
custom 5300817317821698790
45
5.78%
custom 5248971676669987341
40
5.13%
custom 5224706979758363100
22
2.82%
custom 5366520520630101665
22
2.82%
custom 5300957342345481893
15
1.93%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 779 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
говорим о еженедельных отчетах.
если вы выложили за 7 дней 2 ролика и 1 пост, фраза "бессмысленное дрочево" как нельзя лучше описывает значимость и функцию отчетов каждый пн, но.
если вы понимаете, что у вас плотный и активный постинг, буквально каждый день выходит контент, еще и по несколько единиц, я за такие отчеты, это будет неприятно, но эффективно и даст больше пространства для оптимизации результатов
у нас …
снова разбираю ваши анон. вопросы >>
так вот, я считаю, что в некрасивых нишах не надо стремиться жестко уходить в эстетику, но и полное уродство вас не заставляют делать 💋▫️▫️🤚🏻🖤🐴
где голден мидл? вот как я бы поступила:
> не ставьте уродский контент на обложку публикации/первой же сторис в сторителлинге
работу до/после всегда можно спрятать в центр повествования, еще и в аккуратном (но по-прежнему наглядном) ша…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @alisamelns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
чатик вакансий @vacantcist · 47,935 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
NO REELS PLS (ШАБЛОНЫ МЕМОВ) @no_reels_pls · 31,638 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Леночка, войдите! SMM вакансии @comeinlena · 27,909 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
mycosmicluv @mycosmicluv_blog · 60,777 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“алиса ведет блог” (@alisamelns), 4,137 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alisamelns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
