Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alisik_dvoeglazova ⛸️❤️‍🩹

Channel

Alisik_dvoeglazova ⛸️❤️‍🩹

@alisik_d

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,043subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001510777419
TypeChannel
Username@alisik_d
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/alisik_d

Growth

7,0427,0927,0677 August 2026 — 7,092 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,088 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,079 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,070 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,064 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,057 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,060 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,052 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,042 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,043 subscribers7,0437 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,035–7,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 12:457,043+1
29 Aug 2026, 15:087,042-10
26 Aug 2026, 14:137,052-8
23 Aug 2026, 17:187,060+3
20 Aug 2026, 01:147,057-7
16 Aug 2026, 21:157,064-6
13 Aug 2026, 15:267,070-9
10 Aug 2026, 09:487,079-9
7 Aug 2026, 19:307,088-4
7 Aug 2026, 03:477,092first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 29 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,354 reactions across 10 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,27767.3%
❤‍🔥5057.95%
🔥4847.62%
💘4457.00%
💋1722.71%
👍1422.23%
😍1081.70%
🎉751.18%
🥰300.472%
🤩200.315%
custom 5386835767479802966150.236%
😁130.205%
👏120.189%
custom 536832721580305083580.126%
🙏80.126%
🤣60.094%
🍓50.079%
👌40.063%
💯40.063%
😘40.063%
7 further kinds170.268%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 10 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
19
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alisik_d. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 April 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC≈4,030 views496 reactions9 Starsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @team_dvoeglazovaPhoto

Baby Girl Алиса и другие ребята 🙌🏻 📷 ksenia_ptl

398💘49🔥35❤‍🔥5custom 53868357674798029664custom 53683272158030508353👏2

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

16 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC≈7,070 views220 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

https://t.me/boost/alisik_d

168💘21custom 538683576747980296611👍9🔥6custom 53683272158030508355

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

16 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC≈6,740 views480 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

348💋62🎉42🥰8💘5🔥3🤔3🤩3

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

16 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC≈4,860 views727 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @team_dvoeglazovaPhoto

⚡️ Алиса прошла проверку на нейтральный статус ISU На сайте появилась ее карточка

545👍78🔥55🎉22❤‍🔥11🥰4🙏42

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

28 Jun 2026, 17:50 UTC≈13,400 views998 reactions19 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Образование — это путь, который продолжается всю жизнь📚🎓

623❤‍🔥219💘103👍14🎉11🔥6🤣6🥰6

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

19 Jun 2026, 10:50 UTC≈9,280 views387 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamtutberidzeeeVideo

Начали сезон с ребятами. ⛸️ Делюсь с вами видео, которое, по непонятной причине, не показала ранее 🤷🏻‍♀️ На нем прекрасные Алиса Двоеглазова, Соня Акатьева и Даша Садкова ну просто прелесть как хороши🤌🏻 😍 🎥ZaKuliSieMoe

276💘68👍28❤‍🔥9😁5🔥1

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

5 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC≈15,100 views832 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Если во время соревновательного сезона мы сойдем с ума, то не скажем об этом, но знаки будут😂

545💘154❤‍🔥95🤩14👏10😁8👍2🥰2

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

20 May 2026, 20:21 UTC≈18,200 views1,076 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

☀️🌊

623🔥259😍108❤‍🔥48💘10💋9🥰9😘4

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

14 May 2026, 22:22 UTC≈11,700 views577 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @team_dvoeglazovaVideo

Раздали стиля 💃🏻

375🔥117💋54❤‍🔥24💘4👍2🥰1

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

29 Apr 2026, 19:15 UTC≈11,400 views561 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @worldofdvoeglazovaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

376❤‍🔥94💋44💘29👌4👍4🦄4😈3

Signed Alisa Dvoeglazova

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @alisik_d. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алина Загитова
@azagitova_official · 87,318
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Tuktik_Elizaveta Tuktamysheva
@Tuktik_liza · 34,814
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
figurexing | фигурексинг 🥵
@figurexing · 35,399
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alisik_dvoeglazova ⛸️❤️‍🩹” (@alisik_d), 7,043 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alisik_d.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.