Channel
@alizairov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
979subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001243905316 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alizairov |
| Created | 28 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alizairov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 979 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 982 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 983 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 984 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 991 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 991 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 990 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 17 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
320 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 76 | 23.8% | |
| 👍 | 75 | 23.4% | |
| ❤ | 64 | 20.0% | |
| 😢 | 57 | 17.8% | |
| ⚡ | 18 | 5.63% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 3.75% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 3.44% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.56% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.625% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alizairov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2024 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Hayotimizda bizni chalg'itadigan va adashtiradigan bir omil bor. Odamlar qaror qabul qilayotganda odatda kelajakni emas, o'tmishni o'ylab turib qaror chiqaradi. Ya'ni, o'tmishni himoya qilib qaror chiqaradi. Kecha sarflagan vaqti, puli yoki mehnatiga qarab kelajakka qaror chiqaradi. Shu sababli o'zi yoqtirmagan ishda qoladi. Baxtsiz bo'lsa ham yashayveradi. Foyda bermayotgan loyihasiga yana pul kiritaveradi. Ox…
👍22❤2🔥2
Menejmentda hindsight bias degan tushuncha bor. Menejer tomonidan odatda natija yomon bo'lganida "men buni oldindan bilgandim" yoki "buni oldindan bilsa bo'lar edi" degan gaplar ishlatiladi. Hamda shu menejer buni mantiqan ham isbotlab beradi. Enni Dyukning Thinking in bets nomli kitobi bor. Shu kitobda qaror chiqarish haqida juda ko'p misollar va holatlar haqida gap ketadi. Inson qaror chiqarayotgan paytda 100% m…
🔥22🤯6❤2⚡1
Assalomu alaykum barchaga! Yaqindan boshlab nashriyotda faoliyat boshlayapman, o'zimni shaxsan qiziqtirgan soha bo'lgani uchun shu qismda davom etishni sinab ko'rmoqchiman. Shaxsiy rivojlanishi ichida bo'lgan biznes turi ) Nashriyotimiz juda katta emas, lekin sekin o'stirib bormoqchimiz. Nashriyotning marketing jamoasiga amaliyot e'lon qilyapmiz. Tajribalilarni ham ko'rib chiqamiz. Undan tashqari o'zimning bog'ch…
🔥20👍9⚡3
Ba’zi joylardan inson charchagani uchun ketmaydi. Ba’zi joylardan inson norozi bo’lgani uchun ham ketmaydi. Ba'zan inson ichidagi "yo'l" davom etishni talab qilgani uchun ketadi. Men deyarli 8 yil umr bergan joyim bilan xayrlashyapman. Bu yerga birinchi marta kelganimda rahbar emas edim. Rejalarim ham bugungidek katta emas edi. Bu yerda men dars berdim. Mas'uliyatdan qochmadim. Deyarli har bir lavozimda ishladim…
😢57❤44👍19🔥16👏7⚡4🤯3😭2
Insonlar qanday qilib baxtsiz bo‘lib qoladi? Odamni faqatgina boshqalarning gap so‘zlari emas, balki o‘zining ichida kechayotgan fikrlari ham adashtirishi mumkin. Chunki inson ongiga kelgan har bir fikr haqiqat bo‘lavermaydi. Fikrlar hayotiy tajribalardan shakllanadi: kuzatuvlari, qo‘rquvi, qiziqishi, yaxshi yoki yomon ko‘rish kabi tajribalariga ko‘ra inson fikrlaydi va shunga ko‘ra xulosa qiladi. Hamda shu tajriba…
❤11👍10🔥10⚡2👏2🤯2
Odamlarni tushunish oson emas Odamni faqat gaplariga qarab toʻliq tushunib boʻlmaydi. Chunki inson bir narsani aytishi mumkin, lekin istayotgan narsasi boshqa boʻlishi mumkin. Masalan, odam doim doʻstlik haqida gapiradi. Ammo obroʻsiga zarar yetishi mumkin boʻlganda doʻstini yolgʻiz qoldiradi. Demak, u doʻstlikni qadrlaydi, lekin odamlarning fikridan koʻproq emas. Inson nimani yaxshi koʻrishi gaplaridan emas, bal…
❤3👍2🔥1
Haqiqiy yomonlik nima? O‘zgarib turadigan narsalar insonni o‘z-o‘zidan yaxshi yoki yomon qilib qo‘ymaydi. Pul inflyatsiya yoki noto‘g‘ri qaror sabab kamayishi mumkin. Mansab rahbariyat almashgani uchun ketishi mumkin. G‘alaba kuchliroq raqib sabab qo‘ldan chiqishi mumkin. Mashhurlik esa yangi trend kelishi bilan so‘nadi. Demak, bularning hech biri doimiy emas. Doimiy bo‘lmagan narsani esa insonning haqiqiy qiymati…
👏3❤2👍2🔥1
Premium Fikrlarni youtubeda boshladik! Har qanday qo'llab-quvvatlashdan xursand bo'laman ) https://youtu.be/Q_HzkH4mbPE
Lekin sun'iy intellektni boshqarish uchun tabiiy intellekt bo'lishi juda muhimi. Busiz bo'lmaydi )
Sun'iy intellekt rivojlanyapti. Har bir inson prompt muhandislikni yuqori darajada o'rganishi kerak deb bilamiz. Bu xuddi kompyuterlar chiqqanida kompyuter savodxonligiga ehtiyoj bo'lganidek gap deb bilaman, sun'iy intellekt chiqdi, sun'iy intellekt savodxonligi muhim. Sun'iy intellektdan to'g'ri foydalanishni o'rganishni barchaga targ'ib qilamiz. Raqamli ta'limni rivojlantirish markazi bilan hamkorlikda aynan shu …
“Shakarmisan, eriysan?” Atrofimizda odatda 2 xil insonlarni ko’ramiz: 1. O‘zidan boshqa hamma aybdor 2. Muammoni o‘zidan ko‘radi Birinchi toifa insonlar ob-havo yomonlashsa, rejalarini to‘xtatadi. Yomg‘ir yog‘sa, o‘qiyotgan kursiga bormaydi, kimdir xafa qilib qo‘ysa ishdan bo‘shab ketadi. U uchun hamma narsaga hukumat aybdor, “surish kerak” deydi. Ikkinchi toifa insonlarni esa to‘siqlar maqsadlari va harakatlarida…
Oʻzgarish ichkarida Kimdir har qanday muammoni imkoniyat deb qabul qiladi, kimdir uchun esa kichkina toʻsiq ham falokat! Oʻqituvchi: "Yoshlar umuman oʻrganishni istamaydi", deb oʻylaydi. Bu esa unda oʻquvchilarga nisbatan salbiy fikrlarni keltirib chiqaradi, natijada esa ishidan zavqlanmaydi va dars zerikarli boʻladi. Talaba: "Menda til oʻrganishda qobiliyat yoʻq", deb oʻylaydi. Bu esa unda "Til oʻrganish tugʻma i…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @alizairov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ali Zairov” (@alizairov), 979 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alizairov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.